<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hi, Matt, everyone.<br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Feb 28, 2022, at 12:24 PM, Thomas, Matthew via NCAP-Discuss <<a href="mailto:ncap-discuss@icann.org" class="">ncap-discuss@icann.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><meta charset="UTF-8" class=""><span style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14.666666984558105px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none; float: none; display: inline !important;" class="">This week’s NCAP DG call with focus on the Workflow process as it relates to the decision points surrounding CI / ECI.</span></div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class="">Is the plan to develop criteria (preferably quantitative) to move between steps in the Workflow? Because I think it’s very important that we do so.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I don’t believe we can hand the Board a toolbox (CI, ECI, etc.) without also giving specific instructions on how to use those tools. And, as last week’s thread pointed out, some of the tools themselves aren’t completely assembled yet (ECI).</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Matt (L.)</div><div class=""><br class=""></div></body></html>