<div dir="ltr"><div>Dear Michael, Suzanne, and Matt T,</div><div><br></div><div>I have now had time to reread the answers to the Board questions. I conclude there are sections that need revision based on the draft Study 2 report. Please take a very close look at Theme 4: Mitigating Harm, especially the section called "Proactive Measures to Reduce the Potential For Harm". As previously mentioned, I believe this section MUST be revised to reflect the work done by the DG and to reflect the proposed new Name Collision Risk Assessment Framework. In fact, it may be possible to significantly shorten this section and then cross-reference the proposed new Name Collision Risk Assessment Framework. If this is not done, the answers to the Board Question outlined in Theme 4 appears not to take account of that work and that is definitely confusing. <br></div><div><br></div><div>In addition, the answers relative to Theme 6: Undelegated Strings and Collision Strings should be impacted by the work done by the DG and that work should be integrated into the responses on Theme 6. At present the draft responses deal with many of the same issues that have now been addressed by the Study 2 work and the draft responses don't reflect that work. For example, there is no mention of a TRT and no mention of a String Collision Risk.</div><div><br></div><div>In my opinion, it would be a mistake to put these Answers to Board Questions out for public comment without conforming the responses to the work done by the DG in Study 2.j The impression given in the current draft, in particular in relation to Theme 4 and Theme 6, would be very disjointed. <br></div><div><br></div><div>Hopefully the Co-Chairs and Michael can see a way forward here by incorporating reference to the draft Study 2 Report, especially in respect of Theme 4 "Proactive Measures to Reduce Potential for Harm" - this is the whole point of Study 2. Also in respect of Theme 6 - especially the section on "Criteria for Determining Whether a String Should Not Be Delegated" - currently no eference to the TRT and the proposed new Framework. Alsoi "Criteria for Determining the Removal of a Collision String from the Do Not Delegate list. This list is now called the Collision String List and terms are important and there should be a reference to Study 2 sections re that list and how, in the Workflow, an applicant can propose a mitigation plan.</div><div><br></div><div>There is substantial work to be done here in connection with the above.</div><div><br></div><div>Thank you,</div><div>Anne <br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><div><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div>Anne Aikman-Scalese</div>GNSO Councilor<div>NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2024</div><div><a href="mailto:anneicanngnso@gmail.com" target="_blank">anneicanngnso@gmail.com</a></div></div></div></div><br></div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 1:42 PM Michael Puckett <<a href="mailto:michael.puckett@icann.org">michael.puckett@icann.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div class="msg-7064774855967470306">
<div lang="EN-US" style="overflow-wrap: break-word;">
<div class="m_-7064774855967470306WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Hello all,<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">In preparation for our meeting at the top of the hour, I’m sharing a list of items for the DG to review/discuss during our call. Please see the
<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1W-pil0kd4WsHGykDTCKcMCMWa3OcTCyhLyb9f2Khm-E/edit" target="_blank">
Outstanding NCAP Report Items</a> doc I’ve been updating for what needs to be done to finalize the report rough draft. Link pasted below as well.
<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">There are various sections of text that need to be reviewed—either because of minor changes or more substantive additions/deletions.
<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Two sections to note are “<b>3.6 – Ethical Considerations</b>” & “<b>4.5 – Notification to users of name collisions…</b>”. For both sections, large rewrites are being made at the bottom of each respective document under a heading titled
<b>Candidate Text</b>. <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Additionally, I would appreciate eyes on the <b>Board Questions doc</b> (links to all documents in Outstanding NCAP Report Items doc).<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Following our call today, the documents (Sec. 1-3, Sec. 4-5, Board Questions) will be open for final input & suggestions
<b><u>until end of day Friday, 10-January 2024</u></b>. At that point, the documents will be closed for discussion so that I can finalize the documents and compile all sections into a single rough draft report, including the three studies completed.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The full rough draft report will be shared with the group Monday 15-January for acceptance by the DG, any final minor changes, and creation of a backlog of action items for the final draft. This will allow us to deliver the rough draft
on time by Wednesday 17-January. <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Looking forward to a productive call with you all very shortly!<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks,<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Michael Puckett<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Technical Writer, ICANN<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1W-pil0kd4WsHGykDTCKcMCMWa3OcTCyhLyb9f2Khm-E/edit" target="_blank">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1W-pil0kd4WsHGykDTCKcMCMWa3OcTCyhLyb9f2Khm-E/edit</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
NCAP-Discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:NCAP-Discuss@icann.org" target="_blank">NCAP-Discuss@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncap-discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncap-discuss</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy</a>) and the website Terms of Service (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos</a>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.</div></blockquote></div>