[Npoc-discuss] Fwd: [CCWG-ACCT] SOAC-Accountability question, for reply by 11-Sep-2017 - NPOC commente?

[Olévié Kouami]

Hello all,
Greetings from Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Just accroach by this thread and want to share it with you for your
contributions on the 'terms limit' of our representatives in the differents
councils.
This 'public comment' is normally due by 11-sep.
Warm regards
Olévié KOUAMI
ExCom
---------- Message transféré ----------
De : "Steve DelBianco" <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>
Date : 8 sept. 2017 1:28 PM
Objet : [CCWG-ACCT] SOAC-Accountability question, for reply by 11-Sep-2017
À : "CCWG Accountability" <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>, "MSSI
Secretariat" <mssi-secretariat at icann.org>, "Bernard Turcotte" <
turcotte.bernard at gmail.com>
Cc :

As discussed on our SOAC team call yesterday, we are nearly finished with
> our public comment responses
> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uAjMUtnaigi5-zSMGmmIbvFNcPxGQC0cMB_a7XskQfI/edit#gid=639129231>
> and updated recommendation
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sT6SscZLT7VK2rVFOMPaiK1Qd8vlVLkm0boRX7I8ru0/edit#>
> to the CCWG.
>
> One remaining question is whether to add an additional Good Practice to
> the 28 we already have in our report.
>
> The purpose of this email is to hear from all members of
> SOAC-Accountability as to whether our report should include this new
> proposed Good Practice:
>
>
> *An AC/SO/Group that elects its officers should impose term limits. *
>
> Note that this proposed Good Practice would *only* apply to AC/SO/Groups
> that have elections.  And as with all of our Good Practices, we describe
> applicability in our Executive Summary:
>
> In Track 1 we recommend 29 Good Practices that each SO/AC/Group should
> implement, to the extent these practices are applicable and an improvement
> over present practices.  We do not recommend that implementation of these
> practices be required. Nor do we recommend any changes to the ICANN
> bylaws.  We do recommend that Operational Standards for periodic
> Organizational Reviews conducted by ICANN could include an assessment of
> Good Practices implementation in the AC/SO subject to the review.
>
> And we include this caveat on page 8:
>
>  "AC/SO/Groups are only expected to implement Good Practices to the extent
> that these practices are applicable and an improvement over present
> practices, in the view of AC/SO/Group participants.  Again, we do not
> recommend that implementation of these practices be required by
> AC/SO/Groups.”
>
> Please reply to all by 11-Sep with your view on whether we should add Term
> Limits as a Good Practice.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/npoc-discuss/attachments/20170910/b22a5c03/attachment.html>