[NPOC-EC] Fwd: URGENT - Time sensitive What is your view on on the question of rebalancing the Nominating Committee (NomCom)

[Raoul Plommer]

Hello NPOC EC,

According to Julf, We need to write up our own response to the letter from
April about the NomCom change.

There are the questions:

1. What does it mean to have a balanced NomCom at a point in time? For
example, what criteria
would you apply to measure or assess whether the NomCom is balanced? And
further, how can
one test whether or not the NomCom is balanced?
2. Do you support the view that the current composition of the NomCom needs
to be rebalanced?
Please explain why or why not.
3. How frequently does the balance need to be measured or assessed?
4. How do you suggest that the NomCom’s composition be rebalanced?
5. Who should conduct this work, and how should it be conducted?
6. How would your community group prioritize consideration of this issue
within your planning
efforts?

We need to finish our response TOMORROW. I will open up a document later
this evening but you can already start discussing our responses here in
this thread.

-Raoul

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 at 10:54
Subject: Re: URGENT - Time sensitive What is your view on on the question
of rebalancing the Nominating Committee (NomCom)
To: <NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>


On 27/06/2023 23:14, dorothy g wrote:
> I believe this is an issue that  concerns both NCUC and NPOC and so an
> NCSG response is appropriate.

Yes, it does concern NCUC, NPOC and NCSG, and we should coordinate our
responses, but the question is directed separately to all 3
constituencies/groups, so we should have 3 separate (but aligned) responses.

        Julf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/npoc-ec/attachments/20230629/e568f9c5/attachment.html>