[NPOC-EC] URGENT - Time sensitive What is your view on on the question of rebalancing the Nominating Committee (NomCom)

[Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele]

So I see that most items were copied from the one I co-authored for NCSG.
Even though we articulate the same position, I will suggest a fresh
re-write of some of the sections so that it doesn't look like copy and
paste.

I will try to commit some time to this rewrite later tomorrow. However, If
I cannot due to time constraints, then I suggest we submit what we have.

Regards

Caleb

On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 5:39 PM Raoul Plommer via NPOC-EC <npoc-ec at icann.org>
wrote:

> Here's a draft I made from the NCSG's document:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rT2atcp7hQS5jNEH-V6E23ACbr3oGkpgzdB3Uifxtv4/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Please comment on it and I'll send it before 24UTC tomorrow.
>
> -Raoul
>
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 at 11:42, Raoul Plommer <plommer at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello NPOC EC,
>>
>> According to Julf, We need to write up our own response to the letter
>> from April about the NomCom change.
>>
>> There are the questions:
>>
>> 1. What does it mean to have a balanced NomCom at a point in time? For
>> example, what criteria
>> would you apply to measure or assess whether the NomCom is balanced? And
>> further, how can
>> one test whether or not the NomCom is balanced?
>> 2. Do you support the view that the current composition of the NomCom
>> needs to be rebalanced?
>> Please explain why or why not.
>> 3. How frequently does the balance need to be measured or assessed?
>> 4. How do you suggest that the NomCom’s composition be rebalanced?
>> 5. Who should conduct this work, and how should it be conducted?
>> 6. How would your community group prioritize consideration of this issue
>> within your planning
>> efforts?
>>
>> We need to finish our response TOMORROW. I will open up a document later
>> this evening but you can already start discussing our responses here in
>> this thread.
>>
>> -Raoul
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> From: Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com>
>> Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 at 10:54
>> Subject: Re: URGENT - Time sensitive What is your view on on the question
>> of rebalancing the Nominating Committee (NomCom)
>> To: <NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>
>>
>>
>> On 27/06/2023 23:14, dorothy g wrote:
>> > I believe this is an issue that  concerns both NCUC and NPOC and so an
>> > NCSG response is appropriate.
>>
>> Yes, it does concern NCUC, NPOC and NCSG, and we should coordinate our
>> responses, but the question is directed separately to all 3
>> constituencies/groups, so we should have 3 separate (but aligned)
>> responses.
>>
>>         Julf
>>
> _______________________________________________
> NPOC-EC mailing list
> NPOC-EC at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/npoc-ec
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.



-- 
*Caleb Ogundele*
Email: muyiwacaleb at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/npoc-ec/attachments/20230629/002f9f65/attachment.html>