[NPOC-EC] [NCSG-PC] Comments on the CCOICI survey

[Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele]

Thank you, Stephanie, and apologies for waking you up so early with a Skype
chat to grant me access after Manju told me you had put up the response.
Thank you Manju for the notification as well.

We will be adapting this for NPOC since we are expected to align with NCSG
but with slight modifications.

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 10:15 AM 陳曼茹 Manju Chen <manju at nii.org.tw> wrote:

> Thank you, Stephanie, for drafting the response!
>
> If no one have raised other opinions until 11 March 23:00UTC, can Julf
> please submit the response on behalf of NCSG?
>
>
> Thank you so much!!
>
>
> Best,
> Manju
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 19:03 Stephanie E Perrin <
> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>
>> Profuse apologies folks, did not realize I had restricted access. SHould
>> now be open to anyone with the link, also attached as a word doc just in
>> case.  Copying Caleb and Juan and Ben in case they have comments.  Deadline
>> is tonight I think?  If anyone has any great ideas on how we could have
>> achieved consensus, I am all ears, but I could not think of anything except
>> to keep trying.  I do not recommend giving small teams or task forces the
>> power to deprive Council of voting something down.  And I could not see how
>> we could not have separated out the work that we did reach agreement on, if
>> we had had more notice of what the CPs were planning.
>>
>> cheers Stephanie
>> On 2024-03-10 10:24 p.m., 陳曼茹 Manju Chen wrote:
>>
>> Hi Spephanie,
>>
>> I can't assess the google doc, guess it'd be the same for others too.
>> Maybe if you could simply circulate the response in word document and we
>> can suggest edits (if any) in this mailing thread.
>>
>> Best,
>> Manju
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 3:33 AM Stephanie E Perrin <
>> stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> I hope you are all happily home again after a safe and relaxing trip,
>>> luggage in tow.  If not, my sympathies.
>>>
>>> Here is a google doc with my suggested comments on the survey. Frankly,
>>> while we are not happy with the outcome of the CCOICI, I cannot see any
>>> point in trying out a different structure.  Maybe we can fix the one we
>>> have.  Maybe we should have brought in ethics and COI experts to help
>>> the task force.  We cannot consider changing the voting procedure at
>>> Council, we depend on the ability to object ourselves.  However, we need
>>> to not repeat what happened, and we need to get back at fixing the SOIs.
>>>
>>> Comments welcome, sorry for the delay but I had to go over the meetings
>>> and the root documents.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KYB7RxmiYymxnyTxJ74ZOwG0EJ-N0GlwRrOEeiWvSwc/edit?usp=sharing
>>>
>>> cheers Steph Perrin
>>>
>>> PS I am hopeless with google documents, hate them, so I wont be offended
>>> if you tell me I set it up all wrong.  Hopefully you can make suggestions
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>

-- 
*Caleb Ogundele*
Email: muyiwacaleb at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/npoc-ec/attachments/20240311/693f6b35/attachment.html>