<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Folks<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Could the agenda be amended so that a discussion on the NomCom rebalancing issue is second on the agenda (letter from Sin to Zuck below). While this is not listed for public comment, the Board is looking for a reply from ALAC. The response could be done as part of the NomCom2 Review - or separately - but we do need to develop a response.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I am less concerned about the budget at this stage since officially the next round of comments for the IANA/ICANN budgets don’t officially start until formal acceptance of the FY24-28 Budgets by the Board so it can follow the rebalancing issue</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">We should also at least look at the PTI Governance issue and amendments to the base gTLD RA and RAA - open now or soon for public comment</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Holly</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""></div></body></html>