[Public-Experts] question on extending the deadline for call for candidates

Tue Sep 9 16:11:48 UTC 2014

Okay
________________________________________
From: Grace Abuhamad [grace.abuhamad at icann.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 9:40 AM
To: Jeanette Hofmann; Janis Karklins; Brian Cute; Theresa Swinehart; Larry Strickling; public-experts at icann.org
Subject: Re: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates

Hi all,
Since the original deadline is tomorrow, I suggest we finalize the
text-announcement for the extension today. Does 30 September work? I've
modified the draft text below (all links will be hyperlinked).

*EXTENDED ‹ Call for Candidates: Seeking Advisors to the ICANN
     Accountability & Governance Coordination Group*

     In light of the 6  27 September
     <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en>public
     comment period
     <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en> on the
     Enhancing ICANN Accountability and Governance Process, the Public
     Experts Group has decided to extend its Call for Candidates
     <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>. The
     original due date of 10 September is now 30 September at 23:59 UTC,
     so as to align with the close of the public comment period. With the
     exception of date, all other elements of the Call for Candidates
     <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en> remain the
     same. For more information on how to submit a nomination, please see
     here <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>.

On 9/9/14 12:41 AM, "Jeanette Hofmann" <jeanette at wzb.eu> wrote:

>Hi all, I agree with extending the deadline a couple of days beyond the
>comment period. I wouldn't be surprised if there were also comments
>about the Public Expert Group.
>Jeanette
>
>
>Am 09.09.14 05:24, schrieb Janis Karklins:
>> Brian,
>>
>> The alignment of dates of two parallel processes seems natural in
>> absence of any other strict deadlines. Community attention will be
>> focuses of comments to accountability framework and related call for
>> advisors.
>>
>> But as our initial idea of bringing selected advisors to ICANN 51
>> meeting is not feasible (as a result of the extension of the deadline)
>> nothing prevents us from further extension of the deadline of the call
>> if we won't have enough proposals.
>>
>> Best regards
>> JK
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Brian Cute [bcute at pir.org]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 9, 2014 4:35 AM
>> *To:* Grace Abuhamad; Theresa Swinehart; Janis Karklins; Lawrence
>> Strickling; Jeanette Hofmann; public-experts at icann.org
>> *Subject:* RE: question on extending the deadline for call for
>>candidates
>>
>> Jeanette, Janis and Larry,
>>
>> I am copying you individually and the public-experts group email list
>> for purposes of transparency.  While this discussion about extending the
>> deadline may seem like a simple administrative matter, our agreement is
>> to conduct our activities on a ³default open² basis unless there is a
>> clear reason to conduct activities in closed session.   I realized the
>> prior emails had not been copied to the public-experts group list and
>> wanted to address that matter.
>>
>> Below is a draft extension of the Call for Candidates from Grace for our
>> consideration.  I am fine with the extension and I have a question about
>> the extension. As drafted, it would close the call for candidates on the
>> same day the public comment period on the accountability process would
>> close.  Is anything substantive ³lost² by closing the call on the same
>> day the comments close?  If so, closing the call beyond the close of the
>> comment period, even if for a matter of a few days to fully consider any
>> comments received late in the process, could make sense.   What are your
>> views?  Thank you.
>>
>> Brian
>>
>> *From:*Grace Abuhamad [mailto:grace.abuhamad at icann.org]
>> *Sent:* Monday, September 08, 2014 9:49 AM
>> *To:* Theresa Swinehart
>> *Cc:* Brian Cute
>> *Subject:* Re: question on extending the deadline for call for
>>candidates
>>
>> How's this?
>>
>>     *EXTENDED ‹ Call for Candidates: Seeking Advisors to the ICANN
>>     Accountability & Governance Coordination Group*
>>
>>     In light of the 6  27 September
>>     <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en>public
>>     comment period
>>     <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en> on the
>>     Enhancing ICANN Accountability and Governance Process, the Public
>>     Experts Group has decided to extend its Call for Candidates
>>     <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>. The
>>     original due date of 10 September is now 27 September at 23:59 UTC,
>>     so as to align with the close of the public comment period. With the
>>     exception of date, all other elements of the Call for Candidates
>>     <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en> remain the
>>     same. For more information on how to submit a nomination, please see
>>     here <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>.
>>
>> I can submit this as a new announcement so that the information is sent
>> out through our announcement system (social media, email, etc), but I
>> also suggest updating the actual Call with the new date and a message
>> about the Extension at the top.
>>
>> *From: *Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart at icann.org
>> <mailto:theresa.swinehart at icann.org>>
>> *Date: *Monday, September 8, 2014 8:20 AM
>> *To: *Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org
>> <mailto:grace.abuhamad at icann.org>>
>> *Cc: *Brian Cute <bcute at pir.org <mailto:bcute at pir.org>>
>> *Subject: *FW: question on extending the deadline for call for
>>candidates
>>
>> Grace, can you prepare what would be an announcement of the extension
>> for sign-off by Larry, Janis, Jeanette and Brian.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Theresa
>>
>> *From: *Lawrence Strickling <lstrickling at ntia.doc.gov
>> <mailto:lstrickling at ntia.doc.gov>>
>> *Date: *Saturday, September 6, 2014 10:45 AM
>> *To: *Janis Karklins <karklinsj at gmail.com <mailto:karklinsj at gmail.com>>,
>> Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette at wzb.eu <mailto:jeanette at wzb.eu>>
>> *Cc: *Brian Cute <bcute at pir.org <mailto:bcute at pir.org>>, Theresa
>> Swinehart <theresa.swinehart at icann.org
>> <mailto:theresa.swinehart at icann.org>>, Fiona Alexander
>> <FAlexander at ntia.doc.gov <mailto:FAlexander at ntia.doc.gov>>, Grace
>> Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org <mailto:grace.abuhamad at icann.org>>,
>> Fadi Chehade <fadi.chehade at icann.org <mailto:fadi.chehade at icann.org>>
>> *Subject: *RE: question on extending the deadline for call for
>>candidates
>>
>> Make it unanimous.
>>
>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
>>
>> -------- Original message --------
>>
>> From: Janis Karklins
>>
>> Date:09/06/2014 4:45 PM (GMT+02:00)
>>
>> To: Jeanette Hofmann
>>
>> Cc: Brian Cute , Theresa Swinehart , Larry Strickling , Fiona Alexander
>> , Grace Abuhamad , Fadi Chehade
>>
>> Subject: Re: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
>>
>> Me too.
>>
>> JK
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette at wzb.eu
>> <mailto:jeanette at wzb.eu>> wrote:
>>
>>     I agree with Brian. Jeanette
>>
>>     On 6 September 2014 13:16:09 CEST, Brian Cute <bcute at pir.org
>>     <mailto:bcute at pir.org>> wrote:
>>     >I think that is the logical thing to do given the comment period.
>>I
>>     >don't know that the substance of the call itself will change in a
>>     >material way based on comments received but in light of the ICANN
>>     >community's request for the comment period, that would be prudent.
>>     >
>>     >Brian
>>     >
>>     >Sent from my iPhone
>>     >
>>     >On Sep 6, 2014, at 5:25 AM, "Theresa Swinehart"
>>     ><theresa.swinehart at icann.org
>>
>><mailto:theresa.swinehart at icann.org><mailto:theresa.swinehart at icann.org
>>     <mailto:theresa.swinehart at icann.org>>>
>>
>>     >wrote:
>>     >
>>     >All,
>>     >
>>     >In light of the posting the accountability process for a last
>>     >call/round of comments yesterday (6 September) for a 21 day public
>>     >comment period, i've been asked whether there would be an
>>extension on
>>     >the deadline for the call for candidates to the date the comment
>>period
>>     >closes. That is, extend it from 10 September to 27 September.
>>     >
>>     >I wanted to raise this for your your decision.
>>     >
>>     >The original call for candidates can be found at:
>>     >https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en
>>     >
>>     >Please let us know if you would like to extend the deadline. If so,
>>     >Grace can assist in preparing a revised announcement extending the
>>     >deadline for your review, and posting upon your approval.
>>     >
>>     >Thanks
>>     >
>>     >Theresa
>>
>>     --
>>     Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>