[RDS-WHOIS2-LawEnforcement] [Ext] RE: Link to Draft Survey - RDS-WHOIS2 LE Needs

[Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu]

Dear all,

Many thanks for the feedback. I would prefer to keep the questions separate just to be on the safe side – I'm worried that otherwise the input could become quite vague. To avoid this, we can add a comment box on the questions 36 and 29 for people to clarify whether this is their unit or a larger group that they are referring to. The text can be "Could you please specify whether your answer refers to your unit or also includes other units or agencies?"

Dear ICANN colleagues, once these changes are made, could you please send us the finalised link that we can share with our addressees?

Many thanks
Cathrin

From: RDS-WHOIS2-LawEnforcement [mailto:rds-whois2-lawenforcement-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of SUN Lili
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 11:05 AM
To: Alice Jansen; rds-whois2-lawenforcement at icann.org
Subject: Re: [RDS-WHOIS2-LawEnforcement] [Ext] RE: Link to Draft Survey - RDS-WHOIS2 LE Needs

Hi Alice and all,

How about we just merge question 35&36 into one? The same for question 28&29.

For your consideration.

Lili

From: Alice Jansen [mailto:alice.jansen at icann.org]
Sent: Friday, 13 July, 2018 4:34 PM
To: SUN Lili <L.SUN at interpol.int>; rds-whois2-lawenforcement at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Ext] RE: Link to Draft Survey - RDS-WHOIS2 LE Needs

Hello Lili,
We have implemented your edits.
With respect your comment #3 – could you please go back to the link and confirm that is what you wanted?
Thanks
Best
Alice

From: SUN Lili <L.SUN at interpol.int<mailto:L.SUN at interpol.int>>
Date: Friday 13 July 2018 at 06:11
To: "rds-whois2-lawenforcement at icann.org<mailto:rds-whois2-lawenforcement at icann.org>" <rds-whois2-lawenforcement at icann.org<mailto:rds-whois2-lawenforcement at icann.org>>
Cc: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen at icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen at icann.org>>
Subject: [Ext] RE: Link to Draft Survey - RDS-WHOIS2 LE Needs

Dear Alice and subgroup members,

Three comments:

1.      The text of question 34 should be changed like “Does the current WHOIS lookup functionality (personal data, e.g.  name, email address, phone number, postal address being redacted by some registrars) meet your needs for the purposes of law enforcement investigations? ”
2.      Question 35 should be revised to reflect the current redaction of personal data. The below draft is for consideration:
How does it not meet your needs?
The lacking of personal data hinders the attribution of malicious domains
Inaccurate data
Other

3.      Questions 35 & 36 should be hidden as question 28 & 29 in the first place to keep the survey in a consistent way.


Thanks,
Lili
******************
***************************************************************************************************
This message, and any attachment contained, are confidential and subject of legal privilege. It may be used solely for the designated police/justice purpose and by the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. The information is not to be disseminated to another agency or third party without the author’s consent, and must not be retained longer than is necessary for the fulfilment of the purpose for which the information is to be used. All practicable steps shall be taken by the recipients to ensure that information is protected against unauthorised access or processing. INTERPOL reserves the right to enquire about the use of the information provided.
If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error. In such a case, you should not print it, copy it, make any use of it or disclose it, but please notify us immediately and delete the message from any computer.
*************************************************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-lawenforcement/attachments/20180716/0a43685c/attachment.html>