[RDS-WHOIS2-RT] Question for Lili

[SUN Lili]

Dear Alan and all,

Sorry for not being able to join the call in time, somehow I couldn't set up the connection through Adobe Connect.

Regarding your question, I'm not sure whether the registrations were pre-date the validation requirement, for there is no indication in the ARS report on this. However, there was indication in the Contractual Compliance Annual Reports that with regards to registrar compliance with RDS (WHOIS) accuracy requirements, the most common issues are Registrars failed to verify or validate RDS (WHOIS) information as required by the WHOIS Accuracy Program Specification (WAPS) of the 2013 RAA, or Registrars did not distinguish between the terms "verification" (which means to confirm or correct) and "validate" (which means to ensure data is consistent with standards) as used in WAPS (see section 1.1.3.3). May be you are right, we can delete ", which is a breach of contractual obligations" to be on safe side.

Thanks,
Lili

-----Original Message-----
From: RDS-WHOIS2-RT [mailto:rds-whois2-rt-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Monday, 14 January, 2019 11:55 AM
To: RDS-WHOIS2-RT <rds-whois2-rt at icann.org>
Subject: [RDS-WHOIS2-RT] Question for Lili

Lili, on page 8 of
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1chwFH3xDdVJgoxE-osDlRcbKPKK35iUk2AK3c42gcb0/edit#,
in section labelled 5 you say the high number of errors going to 1stor further notice implies registrars are not validating in breach of agreement.

Is this the case. I would have thought the vast majority were registrations that pre-date the requirement to validate.

Am I missing something?

Alan

_______________________________________________
RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list
RDS-WHOIS2-RT at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt