[registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated

[Elana Broitman]

correct
 

Elana Broitman 
Register.com 
575 Eighth Avenue 
New York, NY 10018 
Phone (212) 798-9215 
Fax   (212) 629-9309 
ebroitman at register.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Hall [mailto:rob at momentous.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 4:51 PM
To: tbarrett at encirca.com; 'Bruce Tonkin'; Elana Broitman
Cc: 'Registrars Constituency'
Subject: RE: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated


I think that is correct, BUT;
 
The gaining registrar must have recieved the confirmation from the standard confirmation request that they sent out.
 
If the Registrant does nothing (ie: does not reply to any of the confirmations), the transfer can be Nack'ed (actually, it should never be officially started at the Registry).
 
So a Registrant who is not contactable (ie: bad email address) or a Registrant who replies to nothing, will not have the domain transfered.
 
Rob.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org]On Behalf Of tbarrett
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 1:41 PM
To: 'Bruce Tonkin'; 'Elana Broitman'
Cc: 'Robert F. Connelly'; 'Registrars Constituency'
Subject: RE: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated


Elana/Bruce,
 
As a followup from Gary's question:
 
If I read this correctly, losing registrars can no longer NACK a transfer if a registrant does not respond to an email confirmation.  Correct?  
 
In other words, the transfer must be allowed by the losing registrar even if the registrant ignores the confirmation request from the losing registrar.
 
Tom
 
 
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 12:58 PM
To: Registrars Constituency
Subject: RE: [registrars] Third Draft Standard form of authorisation for use by losing registrars after a transfer is initiated


At 03:13 PM 10/9/03 +0100, Gary Boyd wrote:


But just so that I am clear. The losing registrar email is only designed to
be an alert to the registrant (thereby providing them with an opportunity to
block the transfer) and therefore the registrant is not required to
undertake any further action to complete the transfer process. 


Dear Gary:  There is a related element.  The Admin Contact may request and authorize the transfer.  Notification of the registrant is a different matter.  We have had cases where a hosting service, which was also the Admin Contact, elected to order a transfer.  Subsequently, the registrant objected and demanded that the domain be returned to PSI.

I think there could be a few cases like that in many bulk transfers of 500 to 1,00 [sic:  Sorry, 1,000] domains.

Regards, BobC



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/registrars/attachments/20031014/488f39c0/attachment.html>