[registrars] Fourth draft of transfer form for LOSING registrars

[Elana Broitman]

Siegfried - does that include a situation where there is an explicit registrar confirmation to the GAINING Registrar?  Can the LOSING Registrar rely on this?  If yes, how explicit must that be? Must it be produced to the LOSING Registrar before the transfer is allowed?

Thanks

Elana Broitman
Register.com
575 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
Phone (212) 798-9215
Fax   (212) 629-9309
ebroitman at register.com 


-----Original Message-----
From: Siegfried Langenbach [mailto:svl at nrw.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 5:22 AM
To: Bruce Tonkin
Cc: registrars at dnso.org
Subject: Re: [registrars] Fourth draft of transfer form for LOSING
registrars


Hallo,

I want to repeat something I already said in Rio:

according to german law (and I guess some other EU-law also) I 
have a problem to ACK a outgoing transfer without explicit answer 
of the registrant (the law is assuming consumer protection).

If ICANN accepts the regulation in which no answer from the 
customer is treated as a YES, I will have to ask the german court for 
a decision (in germany the loosing party pays all the court and 
lawyer fees).

I have to do this as a self-protection act.
I still wonder why a better working process (auth_code) is not 
used...

Respectfully
Siegfried Langenbach 
 
Computer Service Langenbach GmbH (CSL GmbH)
GERMANY
 





On 15 Oct 2003 at 18:54, Bruce Tonkin wrote:

Subject:        	[registrars] Fourth draft of transfer form for LOSING registrars
Date sent:      	Wed, 15 Oct 2003 18:54:34 +1000
From:           	"Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>
To:             	<registrars at dnso.org>

> 
> Hello All,
> 
> Below is an updated version.  This version will be discussed by a
> meeting of the ICANN staff Transfers Assistance Group later this week.
> 
> Note this form is for use by losing registrars after they receive
> notification of a transfer from the registry.  The losing registrar may
> contact the registrant to confirm whether they have authorised a
> transfer.  It is entirely optional for a losing registrar to send the
> form.
> 
> The changes include:
> - adding the ability to include multiple domain names
> - some wording improvements suggested by Thomas Roessler (At Large
> Advisory Committee)
> 
> Further comments welcome.
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce
> 
> 
> ************************************************************************
> ******************
> 
> An English version of this message is contained below.
> 
> <Insert translation of English version in preferred language of the
> registrant if known>
> 
> ENGLISH VERSION
> 
> DOMAIN NAME TRANSFER 
> 
> Attention: <insert Registrant or Administrative Contact of Record as
> listed in the WHOIS>
> 
> Re: Transfer of <insert domain name or list of domain names>
> 
> <insert name of registrar and/or name of reseller> received notification
> 
> on <insert date of notification> that you have requested 
> a transfer to another domain name registrar. 
> 
> If you want to proceed with this transfer, you do not need to respond to
> this message.
> 
> If you wish to cancel the transfer, please contact us before <insert
> date> by:
> 
> [Note the following contact methods are optional and the order of
> presentation is at the choice of the registrar]
> 
> [optional] send an email to <insert contact details>
> 
> [optional] send a fax to <insert contact details>
> 
> [optional] or please go to our website <insert URL of confirmation
> webpage> 
> [Note: website to contain text as above, with the option to confirm or
> deny the transfer.]
> 
> If we do not hear from you by <insert date>, the transfer will proceed.