[registrars] Draft for TF2

[Paul Stahura]

Tom,

Why have the tech contact in the anonymous accessed data?
And why not have the creation, expiration and update dates?

Also, many registrars display other, non-required information in the whois
output such as the name of the reseller.  Your statement does not mention
this data.  Should we explicitly mention that we want to continue to have
the ability to display such non-required information as we choose?

How about the following for the anonymous accessed data set:

1.1 	Name of the Registrant
1.2 	Country of the Registrant
1.3 	Name of the Admin-C
1.4 	Country of the Admin-C
1.5  	Name of the Technical Contact
1.6   Country of the Technical Contact
1.7 	Nameserver names 
1.8 	Registrar of record
1.9   Creation Date
1.10 	The non-auto renewed expiration Date
1.11	The Last Updated date (the date the whois info last changed)
1.12	The domain itself


Also, does this apply only to gTLDs or also ccTLDs and sTLDs  ?

Wondering,
Paul


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Keller
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 2:53 AM
To: registrars at dnso.org
Subject: [registrars] Draft for TF2


Hello,

please find attached my draft of the Registrar Constituency Statement
for
the WHOIS TF 2. 

I tried to incorporate all the registrar input I got over the course of 
the last month as well as the findings of the TF2 data collection which 
should be available for public review soon.

Please be advised that we have to formulate an offical statement on this
topic
until April 16.

Best,

tom

--

Thomas Keller

Domain Services
Schlund + Partner AG
Brauerstrasse 48         		           Tel
+49-721-91374-534
76135 Karlsruhe, Germany               	Fax  +49-721-91374-215
http://www.schlund.de                  	tom at schlund.de