[registrars] RE: WLS on ICANN's agenda

[tbarrett]

Dear Mike,

During the ICANN Board Meeting tomorrow, could you ask the following
questions?

When three (3) registrars sent a letter to Paul Twomey on December 3 in
support of WLS, it was promptly published on the ICANN website
(http://www.icann.org/correspondence/registrars-to-twomey-03dec03.htm).

However, when twenty-five (25) registrars sent a letter to Paul Twomey on
December 12 opposing WLS, it has not been posted on the ICANN website.  See
attachment for a copy of this letter.

Is there any reason for this descrepancy?  What other correspondence has
ICANN withheld from the public?

In order to regain credibility, ICANN must be more even-handed in publishing
correspondence on its website.

See you in Rome,

Tom





-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Michael D. Palage
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 9:02 PM
To: Rick Wesson; Registrars List
Subject: [registrars] RE: WLS on ICANN's agenda


Rick:

Sometimes you make me laugh :-)

Best regards,

Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Wesson [mailto:wessorh at ar.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 8:41 PM
To: Registrars List
Cc: Michael D. Palage
Subject: WLS on ICANN's agenda



Will Mike Palage provide us some in site as to the board's negotiations with
Verisign regarding WLS?

I hope that mike still has some ties to Registrars enough to clue us in on
what transpires next week.

see http://www.icann.org/minutes/

   Proposed Agenda:
     ...
      o WLS Negotiations with VeriSign


-rick



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: WLS Letter.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 101037 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/registrars/attachments/20040217/eb6eccbe/WLSLetter.pdf>