[registrars] Re: Conference Call Invitation for 07/06/2004 01:30 PM

[Robert F. Connelly]

At 06:20 PM 7/4/04, Jean-Michel Becar wrote:
>Bob,
>this email is not against you it's just a alarm I tried to fire up in that 
>RC where everything seems so smooth but it's just an appearance.
>I think a 2 day notice for a conf call at 5:00am is not really friendly.
>Who and when this has been decided? Don't we have to take the decision in 
>a open and fair manner?
>Especially knowing that Bhavin is in ASIA choosing a non friendly time for 
>him is not really nice or it's made on purpose.

Dear Jean-Michel:

Here is the original request:

Subject: [rc-excom] FW: ICANN Budget issues
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:31:25 -0400

I was driving at the time, arrived at my destination at 23:30 PDT.  By the 
time I arranged for it, it was Saturday in Tokyo.

Look at the options, I don't have India on this chart but figure back from 
Singapore:

         http://psi-japan.com/gmtime99.html

See you in KL:-)  Regards, BobC

>Does it mean some people really don't agree with Bhavin?
>In that case it should be discussed openly.
>I really start to be fed up with the lack of communication in that 
>constituency and the lack of consideration.
>Several times I've asked we had a list of on going topics and to do 
>list...but I had no support nor follow up .. does it mean people are just 
>playing in their field and just don't care of the others ...in that case 
>I'm just wondering why we have a RC.
>I really think ExCom should talk *more* to us.
>Hope my signal has been heard at least I tried.
>Regards,
>Jean-Michel