[registrars] .net thick/thin discussion

[Jean-Michel Becar]

I agree with Marcus.
I like thick registries, whois is easier to manage and having most of 
the TLD (.biz, .info, .name, .org)  being thick today, I wish  I could 
have all my system  as much consistent  as  possible.
Less code to maintain = less cost.
JM

Marcus Faure wrote:

>Hello,
>
>I personally think that this will cause a lot of confusion and support for the
>registrars. One of the reasons I support thick is that we have so many
>broken whois servers out there. A thin approach will not cure this.
>
>Yours,
>Marcus
>
>  
>
>>Thanks Marcus.
>>
>>I agree that the registrars constituency does not seem to have a
>>consensus position on this topic.
>>
>>My view is that a registry operator can technically operate a thick and
>>thin model in parallel, and the choice should be made available to
>>registrars according to their business model and technical resources.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Bruce
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org 
>>>[mailto:owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Marcus Faure
>>>Sent: Thursday, 22 July 2004 5:07 PM
>>>To: registrars at dnso.org
>>>Subject: [registrars] .net thick/thin discussion
>>>
>>>
>>>Dear all,
>>>
>>>following a discussion among german-speaking registrars, I 
>>>would like to state that the rc should reconsider its 
>>>position on the "thinness" of .net.
>>>I understand that at least some people in the rc are in 
>>>favour of a thin model, however, our little group has 
>>>unanimously decided to favour a thick model. Therefore, the 
>>>rc recommendation should not favour thick or thin as at least 
>>>at this point in time there is no clear vote for either direction.
>>>
>>>Yours,
>>>Marcus
>>>
>>>on behalf of core, key systems, psi-usa and schlund
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>