[registrars] Proliferation of registrar locks

[Paul Lecoultre(CORE secretariat)]

Tim,

You are right, experiences will gives more answers. Personnally I was more
worried to the fact that registrars moved to the automatic lock status rather
than with the consequences that it will (not) bring. Since this summer we
got experiences about the by default lock status at registrars.

Regards,

Paul


Tim Ruiz wrote:

> Paul,
> 
> This seems premature to me. We are only 3 days into the new policy. All you
> are doing right now is pre-supposing some aspect of it is insufficient or
> that registrar practices are mucking it up. I don't think you'll have a
> convincing argument for change unless there is some evidence that there is a
> problem. That will take some time, at least more than 3 or 4 days.
> 
> Tim
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org
> [mailto:owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Ross Wm. Rader
> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 8:49 AM
> To: Paul Lecoultre(CORE secretariat)
> Cc: Registrars at dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [registrars] Proliferation of registrar locks
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 15/11/2004 5:25 AM Paul Lecoultre(CORE secretariat) noted that;
> 
> | "I think its appropriate to wait and see what precedents and actions they
> | (ICANN) take to clarify this in the coming months".
> |
> | Shouldn't we define instead the first step?
> 
> Yes - sort of. There are review phases built-in to the policy. It is
> definitely appropriate for us, as a constituency, to ensure that the
> GNSO council and the ICANN staff (who will be undertaking these reviews)
> are explicitly aware of our experience, concerns and wishes as it
> relates to the implementation and execution of this policy.
> 
> So lets start a laundry list:
> 
> 1. Does the policy appropriately deal with registrar_lock proliferation
> and implementation? How can the policy be amended/modified/improved to
> take into account the evolution of practices in the market over the last
> 12 months?
> 
> ...what else?
> 
> - --
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ~                       -rwr
> 
> 
> 
> Contact info: http://www.blogware.com/profiles/ross
> Skydasher: A great way to start your day
> My weblog: http://www.byte.org
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
> 
> iD8DBQFBmMH56sL06XjirooRAlMzAJ99JlFD8rw37ZEs9ArqFqHF6mi7EACcClnk
> mgQAqqMcCIh0/35Lb1br82Y=
> =QjY1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
CORE Internet Council of Registrars   http://corenic.org
WTC II, 29 route de Pre-Bois, CH-1215 Geneva, Switzerland
Tel +4122 929-5744 Fax +4122 929-5745 secretariat at corenic.org