[registrars] .NET Agreement Update
Ross Rader
ross at tucows.com
Tue Aug 23 19:41:34 UTC 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
We should do both. As a symbolic gesture, I think the resolution only
gets us so far. Seeing names at the bottom of a page carries a certain
weight that gets toned down through a 3 week voting process :)
It would be useful for you to proceed with that idea Bhavin and let the
motion proceed - I don't see any conflicts between the two processes,
they are highly complementary in fact.
On 23/08/2005 4:59 AM Bhavin Turakhia noted that;
>>>Take out the abstract of changes we have made in the .NET
>>
>>RRA, and form
>>
>>>a single statement from that abstract.
>>>
>>>We will then make that statement as the Constituency's
>>
>>official position.
>>
>>Dear Ross: If this proposal and the fleshed out document
>>meets with your approval, we may take it as a friendly
>>amendment to your motion. What think you? Regards, BobC
>
>
> I believe me and Ross were trying the same thing essentially
>
> bhavin
>
- --
- --
Regards,
-rwr
"Every contrivance of man, every tool, every instrument,
every utensil, every article designed for use, of each
and every kind, evolved from very simple beginnings."
- Robert Collier
Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
iD8DBQFDC3vu6sL06XjirooRAi7eAJ4/krPJbNDJ4on86vbOnzT/nKIhhgCeNIW9
Tn4UhEeIDuo1AQ7mr68+w1k=
=So0F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the registrars
mailing list