[registrars] Registrars approve ICANN budget (2005-2006)
Bhavin Turakhia
bhavin.t at directi.com
Mon Dec 19 15:38:54 UTC 2005
An important thing to note is though Paul stated in the public forum that
"registrars have not yet approved the budget" - what Paul should have been
really stating is that - "registars have not yet BEEN ASKED to approve the
budget".
- Bhavin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org
> [mailto:owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 1:20 PM
> To: registrars at gnso.icann.org
> Subject: [registrars] Registrars approve ICANN budget (2005-2006)
>
>
> Hello All,
>
> In the public forum of the recent ICANN meeting in Vancouver,
> Paul Twomey reported that registrars had not yet approved
> being invoiced for the variable registrar accreditation fees
> which make up the majority of the ICANN budget.
>
> The relevant section of the registrars accreditation
> agreement is shown
> below:
> (http://www.icann.org/registrars/ra-agreement-17may01.htm#3 )
>
> "3.9.2 Variable Accreditation Fee. Registrar shall pay the
> variable accreditation fees established by the ICANN Board of
> Directors, in conformity with ICANN's bylaws and articles of
> incorporation, provided that in each case such fees are
> reasonably allocated among all registrars that contract with
> ICANN and that any such fees must be expressly approved by
> registrars accounting, in the aggregate, for payment of
> two-thirds of all registrar-level fees. Registrar shall pay
> such fees in a timely manner for so long as all material
> terms of this Agreement remain in full force and effect, and
> notwithstanding the pendency of any dispute between Registrar
> and ICANN."
>
> Kurt Pritz has notified that as of Friday 16 Dec 05, 142
> registrars, representing over 70% of registrar-level fees
> paid, have expressed their approval (exceeding the two-thirds
> approval required).
>
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
>
More information about the registrars
mailing list