[registrars] Motion for a Vote on Grace Period Deletion Fee

[Donny Simonton]

John,
I think you may have proved the point of some of the others who have
commented.  http://www.snaptraffic.com is now just a lonely parked domain
with dotster.  Maybe the reason their domain is only parked is because
somebody (Verisign) stopped the practice.

Personally, I'm not saying I'm for the practice or against it.  But if it's
allowed I think this will be worse than the 2pm EST drop.  Each registrar
will have over a million domains and only keep the ones that make money.  Oh
wait, don't I remember reading something that says that domain registrars
are not supposed to own domains.

Donny

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-
> registrars at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of John Berryhill
> Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 7:45 PM
> To: Nevett, Jonathon; Jay Westerdal; registrars at dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [registrars] Motion for a Vote on Grace Period Deletion Fee
> 
> 
> 
> 
> http://web.archive.org/web/20020111184533/http://www.snaptraffic.com/
> 
> With SnapTraffic, you can register domain names to drive traffic to your
> site and then delete them within 72 hours if they don't meet your traffic
> requirements! It's simple: place domain name orders and then watch the
> traffic on those domains using the SnapTraffic Traffic Preview service.
> Traffic Preview provides you with complete data on unique visitors and
> hits
> to the domain names in your order. If the domain names does not provide
> the
> traffic you need, simply delete your order within 72 hours and pay just a
> 50
> cents processing fee. If you choose not to register the domains in your
> order, you'll only be charged 50 cents per domain name abandoned.
> 
> ---------
> 
> (if the url wraps, try this http://tinyurl.com/8vhma)
> 
> 
> That was back in 2002.  How did the debate go then?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>