[registrars] Measures of success of the transfers policy
Bruce Tonkin
Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au
Thu Nov 10 14:15:35 UTC 2005
Hello Jordyn,
>
> More importantly, as Tim points out, portability is no better
> under the new transfer policy--the percentage of transfers
> that succeeds seems to be no better now than under the
> previous policy, with the exception of names managed by
> registrants unlucky enough to misunderstand what locking does.
>
One of the failings of the transfers policy work so far is that we have
never established a measureable benchmark for the current system. Thus
it is hard to prove either way whether the policy met its objective.
I hope that before we do any more work, that we can at least establish a
measure whereby we can see whether policy changes make it better or
worse.
I think the perception of Melbourne IT is that it hasn't really got any
better, just more complex and expensive to administer.
Regards,
Bruce
More information about the registrars
mailing list