[registrars] Ballot Request: Adopt as Constituency Position

[Marcus Faure]

<offtoptic>
Didn't we change the number of endorsements to 3?
</offtopic>

Marcus

[text/html is unsupported, treating like TEXT/PLAIN]

> <div>Jay, according to our Rules of Procedure we need to first get
> the motion endorsed (requires 5), then amendments can be offered. If
> the amendment is accepted as friendly by the author of the
> motion it is incorporated into the motion before the vote. If not,
> the amendment is voted on separately along side the original motion.</div>
> <div> </div>
> <div>With that in mind, I endorse Ross' motion.<BR><BR></div>
> <P style="MARGIN: 0px">Tim<BR></P><BR><BR>
> <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; BORDER-LEFT:
> blue 2px solid"><BR>-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: RE:
> [registrars] Ballot Request: Adopt as Constituency<BR>Position<BR>From:
> "Jay Westerdal" <jwesterdal at nameintel.com><BR>Date: Wed, October
> 05, 2005 1:32 pm<BR>To: "'Paul Stahura'" <stahura at enom.com>,
> "'Robert F. Connelly'"<BR><BobC at awesome-goo.com>, "'Registrars
> Constituency'"<BR><registrars at dnso.org><BR><BR>Paul,<BR>I would
> propose Registries follow a documented procedure for
> showing<BR>expiration date since they are not authoritative instead of
> just hiding the<BR>field flat out:<BR><BR>On expiration:<BR>A) if
> Auto-renewed by Registry<BR>  1) Hide Expiration date with the
> words "Pending Registrar Action".<BR>  2) After 45 days, set
> expiration date to be a year from initial<BR>Expiration Date.<BR>B) if
> Explicitly renewed by Registrar<BR>  1) Show new date <BR><BR>Ross
> if you would like to except this as a friendly amendment I would
> second<BR>your initial motion. I am not in favor of taking the
> expiration date away<BR>from ISP, Hosting Companies, Advisers, Friends,
> and Family of the domain<BR>owners at the Registry level but everything
> else in your motion looks good.<BR><BR>Jay Westerdal<BR>Name
> Intelligence, Inc.<BR>http://www.nameintelligence.com
>  <BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From:
> owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org<BR>[mailto:owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org]
> On Behalf Of Paul Stahura<BR>Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 9:50
> AM<BR>To: Robert F. Connelly; Registrars Constituency<BR>Subject: RE:
> [registrars] Ballot Request: Adopt as Constituency
> Position<BR><BR>Because then we'd all have to transmit another command
> to the registry<BR>if the registrant paid during the 45-day
> period.<BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From:
> owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org<BR>[mailto:owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org]
> On Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly<BR>Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 7:31
> PM<BR>To: Registrars Constituency<BR>Subject: RE: [registrars] Ballot
> Request: Adopt as Constituency Position<BR><BR>At 07:12 PM 10/4/05,
> Paul Stahura wrote:<BR>>2) Some registries cause another customer
> service problem and that is<BR>>when a name is auto-renewed but the
> registrant hasn't paid.<BR><BR>Dear Paul:  Why not ask registries
> or ICANN to have the registry whois<BR>say <BR>"auto-renewed" (or
> something like that) until the 45 days passes unless<BR>the
> <BR>registrar executes an explicit renewal?  Regards, BobC
> </BLOCKQUOTE>
>