[registrars] Motion regarding TF for PDP-Feb06

[Jordyn Buchanan]

Bhavin:
 
I appreciate the nomination, but unfortunately I think between chairing
the Whois TF and my other obligations, I don't believe that I have time
to adequately serve the constituency in this capacity.
 
However, I would like to nominate one of my colleagues, Jeff Eckhaus,
who many of you may have met at recent ICANN meetings.  Jeff has been
tracking many of the related policy issues and I believe he would be an
excellent representative on the task force.
 
Jordyn

________________________________

From: owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Bhavin Turakhia
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 9:22 AM
To: 'Tim Ruiz'; registrars at gnso.icann.org
Subject: RE: [registrars] Motion regarding TF for PDP-Feb06


for the open spots i would like to nominate jon nevett and jordynn
buchannan
 
for the council spots i would like to nominate ross rader
 
(above subject to interest of individual candidates)
 
bhavin


________________________________

	From: owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-registrars at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
	Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 7:03 AM
	To: registrars at gnso.icann.org
	Subject: [registrars] Motion regarding TF for PDP-Feb06
	
	
	 
	The GNSO Council has initiatied PDP-Feb06. The purpose of this
task 
	force is to examine the policy implications of the registry
contracts 
	and make policy recommendations in specific areas covered by the
Task 
	Force Terms of Reference. Each constituency may appoint up to
three 
	representatives to this task force, one of which should be a
member of 
	the GNSO Council.
	
	Therefore, I would like to open up nominations for the two open
spots, 
	and the single council spot. Nominee's for either of the "open"
seats 
	must only be members of the Registrar Constituency. Nominee's
for the 
	"council" seat must be a member of the GNSO Council (i.e. one of
Tom 
	Keller, Ross Rader or Bruce Tonkin).
	
	This election will be conducted on one ballot. The GNSO Council
member 
	with the highest level of support will be appointed to the
Council seat. 
	The next two highest ranking nominee's will be appointed to the
open 
	seats. There is no need to specify which seat a candidate is
nominated for.
	
	For example;
	
	Case #1
	Nominee #5 (Councillor) - 40% support
	Nominee #3 - 30% support
	Nominee #2 (Councillor) - 15% support
	Nominee #4 - 10% support
	Nominee #1 - 5% support
	
	Nominee #5 would be appointed to the council seat, and nominee's
#3 and 
	#2 would be appointed to the "open" seats.
	
	Case #2
	Nominee #3 - 40% support
	Nominee #4 - 30% support
	Nominee #1 - 15% support
	Nominee #5 (Councillor) - 10% support
	Nominee #2 (Councillor) - 5% support
	
	Nominee #5 would be appointed to the council seat, and nominee's
#3 and 
	#4 would be appointed to the "open" seats. 
	
	The genesis of PDP-Feb06:
	
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg02124.html
	 
	Tim 
	

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/registrars/attachments/20060309/cdf9061d/attachment.html>