[registrars] FW: Draft Procedure

[Thomas Keller]

Am 19.01.2007 schrieb Tim Ruiz:
> I would think ICANN GC could come up with a base set of terms that cannot change without Board approval. Other than that, the draft procedure looks fine.<BR><BR>Tim <BR>

Isn't that what the FEB 06 Taskforce is not supposed to come up with?

Best,

tom

> <div   name="wmMessageComp"><BR><BR>
> <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid">-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: RE: [registrars] FW: Draft Procedure<BR>From: "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett at networksolutions.com><BR>Date: Fri, January 19, 2007 8:18 am<BR>To: "Thomas Keller" <tom at schlund.de><BR>Cc: "Registrars Constituency" <registrars at gnso.icann.org><BR><BR>Thanks Tom.<BR><BR>
> No vote necessary -- just provide comments to the list and to ICANN.
>  My<BR>
> only proposed change to the proposal is to add a standard for when
> these<BR>
> decisions should go to the Board.  The current draft is
> too<BR>discretionary in that regard.  <BR><BR>Thanks.<BR><BR>Jon<BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From: Thomas Keller [mailto:tom at schlund.de] <BR>Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 5:08 AM<BR>To: Nevett, Jonathon<BR>Cc: Registrars Constituency<BR>Subject: Re: [registrars] FW: Draft Procedure<BR><BR>
> Seems ok to me. Do we have to vote on this draft to formally accept
> it<BR>and make it policy?<BR><BR>Best,<BR><BR>tom<BR><BR>Am 17.01.2007 schrieb Nevett, Jonathon:<BR>> From ICANN for our review and comment.  Thanks.  Jon<BR>> <BR>> -----Original Message-----<BR>> From: Kurt Pritz [mailto:pritz at icann.org] <BR>> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:02 PM<BR>> To: Nevett, Jonathon; Marie Zitkova<BR>
> > Cc: Tim Ruiz; Cherstubbs at aol.com; Tim Cole; Mike Zupke;
> Craig<BR>Schwartz;<BR>> Dan Halloran<BR>> Subject: Draft Procedure<BR>> <BR>> Marie, Jon:<BR>> <BR>> Please share this information with your constituency groups.<BR>> <BR>
> > Attached is a draft procedure for considering gTLD registry
> proposals<BR><BR>
> > for amendments to the Registry-Registrar Agreement (RRA). The
>  <BR>
> > procedure is intended to provide opportunity for comment and
>  <BR>> discussion and also provide certainty as to timeframe for<BR>consideration.<BR>> <BR>
> > This draft arises from the new form of registry agreements that
>  <BR>
> > requires ICANN approval for proposed changes to the RRA. This draft
>  <BR>
> > procedure essentially provides for notice to registrars of proposed
>  <BR>
> > changes, an opportunity for comment, and a forum for possibly
>  <BR>
> > resolving areas of controversy. Not specifically described in the
>  <BR>
> > procedure but included are public posting of major changes changes
> to<BR><BR>
> > agreements as has been discussed in the recent past and Board
>  <BR>> approval of changes to ICANN agreements in certain circumstances.<BR>> <BR>> Please review and provide comment.<BR>> <BR>> Regards,<BR>> <BR>> Kurt<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Kurt Pritz<BR>> <BR>> ICANN<BR>> 4676 Admiralty Way, #330<BR>> Marina del Rey. CA  90292<BR>> <BR>> +1.310.301.5809 (office)<BR>> +1.310.400.4184 (mobile)<BR>> <BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>Gruss,<BR><BR>tom<BR><BR>(__)        <BR>(OO)_____  <BR>(oo)    /|\ A cow is not entirely full of<BR> | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!<BR> w w w  w </BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
> 
> 
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\	A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w