[registrars] Motion to adopt Tasting Position Statement

[Robert F. Connelly]

At 02:32 PM 11/9/2007 Friday  -0800, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
>This puts a (process) conclusion ahead of any (policy) ballot. I suggest not making (process) comments, after all, in theory we could reach a two-thirds position among the voting RC members. 

Dear Eric:  Precisely why I am making a second motion.  Our negotiator must have the consensus of the Consistory in order to be credible.  I trust you'll endorse Tim's motion --- *and* mine:-)

Regards, BobC