[registrars] Submission from the Registrar Constituency regarding views on transfers policy questions

[Ross Rader]

Sorry about that Paul. I must have missed your email. The actual call  
for submissions was many, many weeks ago, although I was delayed until  
recently in putting the final summary together. My request last week  
was for those that had submitted comments to verify the fairness and  
accuracy of the summaries. I did include one late submission, and I  
could have included yours had I seen your email. The late submissions  
were included as an appendix to the main summary.

Again, sorry.

-ross

On 4-Feb-08, at 3:46 PM, Paul Goldstone wrote:

>
> Ross,
>
> I sent the following on Saturday:
>
> "I also think it should be clarified that a registrar is ultimately
> responsible for providing an auth code even when a reseller is
> involved.  I didn't see that mentioned in the document you sent, but
> it's something we deal with on a regular basis so I assume we're not
> the only ones."
>
> I agreed with many of your other points in the document and just had
> that extra point to add (which I thought was useful).  Is it possible
> that my email was missed, or were my comments not formatted correctly,
> or did I misunderstand who was able to submit comments?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> ~Paul
> :DomainIt
>
> At 02:28 PM 2/4/2008, Ross Rader wrote:
>> As promised, attached is the final document summarizing a collection
>> of views from the membership of the registrar constituency. If you
>> have any questions, please let me know.
>>
>> Also, thank you for the extension. It was very helpful.
>>
>> Ross Rader
>> Director, Retail Services
>> t. 416.538.5492
>> c. 416.828.8783
>> http://www.domaindirect.com
>>
>> "To solve the problems of today, we must focus on tomorrow."
>> - Erik Nupponen
>>
>>
>

Ross Rader
Director, Retail Services
t. 416.538.5492
c. 416.828.8783
http://www.domaindirect.com

"To solve the problems of today, we must focus on tomorrow."
- Erik Nupponen