Fwd: Re: [registrars] Re: FW: ICANN per-name fee at start of AGP vs at exit.
Robert F. Connelly
BobC at awesome-goo.com
Sun Feb 10 00:12:24 UTC 2008
At 03:18 PM 2/9/2008 Saturday -0500, Paul Goldstone wrote:
>Bob,
>
>Perhaps I'm not looking at it right, but I understand kiting to be
>when domains never actually leave the AGP.
Dear Paul: I may be misunderstand "kiting".
I think that if an individual (or a registrar) registers and domain and cancels it in less than 5 days, and then registers it again with the same or a different registrar, it may be kiting.
If said registrant deletes it again and re registers it again, it probably *is* kiting.
An individual may be able to kite if he uses registrars which provide said registrant with a feature that permits him/her to make deletions. The registrars being used in this cycle may be oblivious of the actions of the registrant.
Regards, BobC
> If a company registers,
>deletes and registers domains within the AGP, a percentage threshold
>of the current or previous months positive registrations would work
>because 5% of nothing is nothing.
>
>Best Regards,
>
>~Paul
>:DomainIt
>
>
>At 11:44 AM 2/9/2008, Robert F. Connelly wrote:
>
>>At 02:40 AM 2/8/2008 Friday -0500, Paul Goldstone wrote:
>>> Both of which seem like good ideas to me.
>>
>>Dear Paul: I'd certainly be happy to pay ten or twenty cents (US$0.20) to help stop the abuse. A percentage will not deter kiting.
>>
>>Regards, BobC
>>
>>
>>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>After all is said and done ---
>>A lot more gets said than done;-}
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
After all is said and done ---
A lot more gets said than done;-}
More information about the registrars
mailing list