[registrars] [Ext] Re: [Rra-review] RRA Amendment Notification for .quebec
Krista Papac
krista.papac at icann.org
Fri Mar 10 13:12:38 UTC 2017
All,
Sorry about forgetting the attachment. Here you go!
Krista Papac
Director, Registry Services & Engagement
ICANN – Global Domains Division
o: +1 310 578 8937
m: +1 714 756 0201
e: krista.papac at icann.org
12025 Waterfront Avenue, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90094
www.icann.org
On 3/10/17, 12:01 AM, "Siemen Roorda" <siemen at openprovider.nl> wrote:
Dear Krista,
Unfortunately, the attachments are missing, can you re-send them to us?
Siemen
On 09/03/2017 21:39, Krista Papac wrote:
> Dear Graeme Bunton,
>
>
>
> Please find attached the updated cover letter and updated redlined
> version of the RRA Amendment for .quebec submitted by PointQuébec Inc to
> be shared with your Stakeholder Group. The attached document contains
> both the cover letter and also the actual RRA where proposed changes are
> indicated in redlines (RRA starts as of page 18).
>
> Please note that following receipt of RrSG’s feedback on the proposed
> changes during the 15-day review period pursuant to Section 4 of the RRA
> Amendment procedure, ICANN has consulted bothRrSG representatives and
> Registry Operator to resolve one remaining issue.
>
>
>
> Accordingly, as agreed during the consultation call
> between RrSG representatives and Registry Operator, ICANN would
> appreciate if RrSG can review the updated proposed changes including the
> cover letter by responding to this message no later than *_23:59UTC on
> 15 March 2017_*. If there is no response during this third review
> period, ICANN will assume there are no concerns and will continue
> processing the request. If you have any further inquiries, please let me
> know.
>
>
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Krista
>
>
>
> Krista Papac
>
> Director, Registry Services & Engagement
>
> ICANN – Global Domains Division
>
>
>
> o: +1 310 578 8937
>
> m: +1 714 756 0201
>
> e: krista.papac at icann.org <mailto:krista.papac at icann.org>
>
>
>
> 12025 Waterfront Avenue, Suite 300
>
> Los Angeles, CA 90094
>
>
>
> www.icann.org
>
>
>
> *From: *Aysegul Tekce <aysegul.tekce at icann.org>
> *Date: *Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 1:51 AM
> *To: *Siemen Roorda <siemen at openprovider.nl>, Graeme Bunton
> <gbunton at tucows.com>
> *Cc: *"fortier at pointquebec.org" <fortier at pointquebec.org>, Krista Papac
> <krista.papac at icann.org>, Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>,
> Jennifer Gore <jennifer.gore at icann.org>, "darcy.southwell at endurance.com"
> <darcy.southwell at endurance.com>
> *Subject: *Re: [Ext] Re: [Rra-review] RRA Amendment Notification for .quebec
>
>
>
> Dear Siemen and Graeme,
>
> Thank you for your email. Now that we have completed the first part of
> the Section 4 of the RRA Amendment procedure
> (https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_system_files_files_rra-2Damendment-2Dprocedure-2D25aug11-2Den.pdf&d=DwIDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=FtAQ3W6bLN46TgSZKvQ7yaWgXCLkUXAcjopsZnUkWVo&m=f3GVFFzO8hg8_SCN68oOg0pKlEXeraLzIzGOcmv-z6I&s=sVx3bg9OyNrNzqUzGz1S4dw0SiPxmEcQ7AFCWYwqZwM&e= ),
> ICANN would like to facilitate a call where both the Registry Operator
> and representative(s) from RrSG can join to discuss this remaining
> concern expressed by RrSG as a result of the second review period.
>
> /4. If the consultations result in changes to the proposal, ICANN will
> submit the revised document to the Registrar Stakeholder Group and open
> an additional review period, which will normally not exceed fifteen (15)
> days. Upon conclusion of any second review period, ICANN will attempt to
> resolve any remaining issues through consultation with the registrars
> and the registry./
>
> ICANN has already reached out to Registry Operator and Registry Operator
> expressed their willingness to have a call with RrSG. Accordingly, would
> it be possible for RrSG member(s) to have a call with the Registry
> Operator? If yes, can you please advise whom ICANN shall invite to this
> call?
>
>
>
> Kind Regards,
>
>
>
>
>
> Aysegul Tekce
>
> Registry Services & Engagement Manager
>
> ICANN – Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
>
> Istanbul, Turkey
>
> T: +90 212 999 6227
>
>
>
>
>
> On 21/12/16 14:15, "Siemen Roorda" <siemen at openprovider.nl> wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear Krista,
>
>
>
> As Graeme is enjoying a well-earned holiday, allow me to respond to this
>
> amendment notification.
>
>
>
> We have had a vivid discussion in the Registrar Stakeholder Group about
>
> the proposed change to section 5.1, defining the notification timeframe
>
> for fee updates. Let me rephrase the respective parts of the RRA and
> the RA:
>
>
>
> ===
>
> RRA 5.1: "Registry will provide registrar with at least thirty (30) days
>
> notice prior to the implementation of any generic or specificically
>
> promotion related reduction of the Fees and at least ninety (90) days
>
> notice prior to the implementation of any increase in the Fees."
>
>
>
> RA 2.10.b: "With respect to renewal of domain name registrations,
>
> Registry Operator shall provide [...] advance written notice of any
>
> price increase [...] of no less than one hundred eighty (180) calendar
>
> days."
>
> ===
>
>
>
> While one could argue about the use of the words "at least" or argue
>
> that the RA will prevail in this case, the RrSG thinks that the registry
>
> should avoid a situation like this (causing material differences between
>
> RA and RRA) in the first place.
>
>
>
> We therefore request the registry to rephrase section 5.1 of the amended
>
> RRA to:
>
>
>
> ===
>
> RRA 5.1: "Registry will provide registrar with at least thirty (30) days
>
> notice prior to the implementation of any generic or specificically
>
> promotion related reduction of the Fees and at least one hundred eighty
>
> (180) days notice prior to the implementation of any increase in the
> Fees."
>
> ===
>
>
>
> A sub-optimal solution would be not including time frames in the RRA at
>
> all, but refer to the RA. We have seen other registries doing so, the
>
> drawback is that changes are not transparent to registrars because they
>
> are not part of the Registry Agreement between registry and ICANN, but
>
> they are affected by changes to it.
>
>
>
> Please confirm timely receipt of this concern, and inform me about any
>
> further information needed and the further steps that will be taken.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> Siemen Roorda
>
> Openprovider
>
> on behalf of the RrSG / RRA Review Team
>
>
>
>
>
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
>
> > Subject: Re: RRA Amendment Notification for .quebec
>
> > Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 01:19:37 +0000
>
> > From: Krista Papac <krista.papac at icann.org>
>
> > To: Graeme Bunton <gbunton at tucows.com>
>
> > CC: Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>,
>
> > fortier at pointquebec.org <fortier at pointquebec.org>, Jennifer Gore
>
> > <jennifer.gore at icann.org>, Darcy Southwell
>
> > <darcy.southwell at endurance.com>, Aysegul Tekce
>
> > <aysegul.tekce at icann.org>, rra-review at icann-registrars.org
>
> > <rra-review at icann-registrars.org>, Krista Papac
>
> > <krista.papac at icann.org>, registrars at icann.org <registrars at icann.org>
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Dear Graeme Bunton,
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Please find attached the updated cover letter and updated redlined
>
> > version of the RRA Amendment for .quebec submitted by PointQuébec
> Inc to
>
> > be shared with your Stakeholder Group. The attached document contains
>
> > both the cover letter and also the actual RRA where proposed
> changes are
>
> > indicated in redlines (RRA starts as of page 18).
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Please note that following receipt of RrSG’s feedback on the proposed
>
> > changes, ICANN has consulted with the Registry Operator pursuant to
>
> > Section 3 of the RRA Amendment procedure and the Registry Operator
>
> > agreed to update the cover letter and the redlines in line with the
>
> > feedback submitted by RrSG.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Pursuant to Section 4 of the RRA Amendment Procedure, the RrSG has
> up to
>
> > 15 days to review the updated proposed changes. If the registrars have
>
> > concerns, please advise ICANN by responding to this message no later
>
> > than 23:59UTC on 21 December 2016. If there is no response during this
>
> > second review period, ICANN will assume there are no concerns and will
>
> > continue processing the request. If you have any further inquiries,
>
> > please let me know.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Kind regards,
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Krista Papac
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Krista Papac
>
> >
>
> > Director, Registry Services & Engagement
>
> >
>
> > ICANN – Global Domains Division
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > o: +1 310 578 8937
>
> >
>
> > m: +1 714 756 0201
>
> >
>
> > e: krista.papac at icann.org <mailto:krista.papac at icann.org>
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > 12025 Waterfront Avenue, Suite 300
>
> >
>
> > Los Angeles, CA 90094
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > www.icann.org
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > *From: *Krista Papac <krista.papac at icann.org>
>
> > *Date: *Friday, October 14, 2016 at 12:05 PM
>
> > *To: *Graeme Bunton <gbunton at tucows.com>
>
> > *Cc: *Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>,
>
> > "fortier at pointquebec.org" <fortier at pointquebec.org>, Jennifer Gore
>
> > <jennifer.gore at icann.org>, Darcy Southwell
>
> > <darcy.southwell at endurance.com>, Aysegul Tekce
>
> > <aysegul.tekce at icann.org>, "rra-review at icann-registrars.org"
>
> > <rra-review at icann-registrars.org>, Krista Papac
> <krista.papac at icann.org>
>
> > *Subject: *Re: RRA Amendment Notification for .quebecDear Graeme
> Bunton,
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Please find attached the updated cover letter and updated redlined
>
> > version of the RRA Amendment for .quebec submitted by PointQuébec
> Inc to
>
> > be shared with your Stakeholder Group. The attached document contains
>
> > both the cover letter and also the actual RRA where proposed
> changes are
>
> > indicated in redlines (RRA starts as of page 18).
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Please note that following receipt of RrSG’s feedback on the proposed
>
> > changes, ICANN has consulted with the Registry Operator pursuant to
>
> > Section 3 of the RRA Amendment procedure and the Registry Operator
>
> > agreed to update the cover letter and the redlines in line with the
>
> > feedback submitted by RrSG.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Pursuant to Section 4 of the RRA Amendment Procedure, the RrSG has
> up to
>
> > 15 days to review the updated proposed changes. If the registrars have
>
> > concerns, please advise ICANN by responding to this message no later
>
> > than 23:59UTC on 01 December 2016. If there is no response during this
>
> > second review period, ICANN will assume there are no concerns and will
>
> > continue processing the request. If you have any further inquiries,
>
> > please let me know.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Kind regards,
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Krista Papac
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Thanks Graeme. We’ll proceed with the next step of the process
> shortly.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Best,
>
> >
>
> > Krista
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Krista Papac
>
> >
>
> > Director, Registry Services & Engagement
>
> >
>
> > ICANN – Global Domains Division
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > o: +1 310 578 8937
>
> >
>
> > m: +1 714 756 0201
>
> >
>
> > e: krista.papac at icann.org <mailto:krista.papac at icann.org>
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > 12025 Waterfront Avenue, Suite 300
>
> >
>
> > Los Angeles, CA 90094
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > www.icann.org
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > *From: *Graeme Bunton <gbunton at tucows.com>
>
> > *Date: *Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 5:32 PM
>
> > *To: *Krista Papac <krista.papac at icann.org>
>
> > *Cc: *Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>,
>
> > "fortier at pointquebec.org" <fortier at pointquebec.org>, Jennifer Gore
>
> > <jennifer.gore at icann.org>, Darcy Southwell
>
> > <darcy.southwell at endurance.com>, Aysegul Tekce
>
> > <aysegul.tekce at icann.org>, "rra-review at icann-registrars.org"
>
> > <rra-review at icann-registrars.org>
>
> > *Subject: *Re: RRA Amendment Notification for .quebec
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Hi All,
>
> > There is general concern among some registrars that diverging time
> lines
>
> > between the RRA and the RA causes two problems:
>
> >
>
> > a) Registrars are not party to the RA; timelines could be changed at
>
> > this level and severely impact our ability to operate. Including
> time
>
> > lines inside the RRA allows registrars to ensure they have at
> least some
>
> > control over future changes.
>
> >
>
> > b) Allowing timelines below those specified inside the RA, even if
>
> > unusable at the moment, establishes a precedent that may be used for
>
> > future RA negotiations.
>
> >
>
> > In short, we're not entirely comfortable relying on provisions in a
>
> > contract we're not party to.
>
> >
>
> > This concern applies across all gTLDs with these sorts of provisions,
>
> > and not just to .quebec.
>
> >
>
> > The other changes to the RRA are satisfactory, thank you.
>
> >
>
> > Graeme
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > On 2016-10-05 8:49 PM, Krista Papac wrote:
>
> >
>
> > Dear Graeme,
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Thank you for reaching out. Yes, we can extend the due date to 12
>
> > October. We look forward to hearing from you then.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Thanks!
>
> >
>
> > Krista
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Krista Papac
>
> >
>
> > Director, Registry Services & Engagement
>
> >
>
> > ICANN – Global Domains Division
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > o: +1 310 578 8937
>
> >
>
> > m: +1 714 756 0201
>
> >
>
> > e: krista.papac at icann.org <mailto:krista.papac at icann.org>
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > 12025 Waterfront Avenue, Suite 300
>
> >
>
> > Los Angeles, CA 90094
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > www.icann.org[icann.org]
>
> >
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.icann.org&d=DQMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=FtAQ3W6bLN46TgSZKvQ7yaWgXCLkUXAcjopsZnUkWVo&m=sYrjAv0t9Ljc7zyFzPXsxWWV6jy0BjCkV1OMT0KylYE&s=3i6PYmdhzQ0hehKpSayi332gz_Ik3susRUEholLJf0I&e=>
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > *From: *Graeme Bunton <gbunton at tucows.com>
> <mailto:gbunton at tucows.com>
>
> > *Date: *Wednesday, October 5, 2016 at 12:17 PM
>
> > *To: *Krista Papac <krista.papac at icann.org>
>
> > <mailto:krista.papac at icann.org>
>
> > *Cc: *Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>
>
> > <mailto:caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>, "fortier at pointquebec.org"
>
> > <mailto:fortier at pointquebec.org> <fortier at pointquebec.org>
>
> > <mailto:fortier at pointquebec.org>, Jennifer Gore
>
> > <jennifer.gore at icann.org> <mailto:jennifer.gore at icann.org>, Darcy
>
> > Southwell <darcy.southwell at endurance.com>
>
> > <mailto:darcy.southwell at endurance.com>
>
> > *Subject: *Re: RRA Amendment Notification for .quebec
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Hi Krista,
>
> >
>
> > There is still some conversation happening around .quebec and
>
> > section 5.1
>
> >
>
> > It feels rushed to conclude these by the 7th, would it be possible
>
> > to extend our deadline until the 12th (Monday is a holiday in
> Canada).
>
> >
>
> > Thanks
>
> >
>
> > Graeme
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > On 2016-09-30 8:24 PM, Krista Papac wrote:
>
> >
>
> > Dear Graeme,
>
> >
>
> > ICANN has been in consultations with the registry operator
>
> > pursuant to Section 3 of the RRA Amendment process; at the
> close
>
> > of the registrar review period, if there are any concerns
>
> > expressed, ICANN will consult with the registry and with the
>
> > Registrar Stakeholder Group to attempt to resolve any such
> concerns.
>
> >
>
> > Accordingly, please find attached the updated cover letter
> where
>
> > registry operator has fixed the typo at Section 5.2.
>
> > Additionally, please find below the responses of the registry
>
> > operator for the other two questions:
>
> >
>
> > /“Section 5.1: There is no need to add 180 days minimum
>
> > notification for renewal price changes as this minimum
> period is
>
> > already set by the Registry Agreement. /
>
> >
>
> > / /
>
> >
>
> > /Section 3.11: The rationale for this Section is that the
>
> > Registry will reimburse the gaining registrar of a bulk
> transfer
>
> > the costs ICANN currently imposes to registrars through
> Section
>
> > B.1.2 of the IRTP.”/
>
> >
>
> > Now that we are at consultation stage of the RRA Amendment
>
> > procedure, we kindly request that you review the responses of
>
> > the registry operator and get back to ICANN with your feedback
>
> > no later than 7 October 2016. Following RrSG’s feedback on the
>
> > responses provided, ICANN will then initiate the step 4 of the
>
> > RRA Amendment procedure: if the consultations result in
> changes
>
> > to the proposal, ICANN will submit the revised document to the
>
> > Registrar Stakeholder Group and open an additional review
>
> > period, which will normally not exceed fifteen (15) days. Upon
>
> > conclusion of any second review period, ICANN will attempt to
>
> > resolve any remaining issues through consultation with the
>
> > registrars and the registry.
>
> >
>
> > Kind Regards,
>
> >
>
> > Krista
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Krista Papac
>
> >
>
> > Director, Registry Services & Engagement
>
> >
>
> > ICANN – Global Domains Division
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > o: +1 310 578 8937
>
> >
>
> > m: +1 714 756 0201
>
> >
>
> > e: krista.papac at icann.org <mailto:krista.papac at icann.org>
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > 12025 Waterfront Avenue, Suite 300
>
> >
>
> > Los Angeles, CA 90094
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > www.icann.org[icann.org]
>
> >
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.icann.org&d=DQMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=FtAQ3W6bLN46TgSZKvQ7yaWgXCLkUXAcjopsZnUkWVo&m=sw_9DKv_9-7oiWj4W9nnlhr_axICb0dpft9dwcrS6YQ&s=NcSSODUr7j_FzEyKEvkg5TrD9qwn4RR2iUJ2OERl3wY&e=>
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > *From: *Graeme Bunton <gbunton at tucows.com>
>
> > <mailto:gbunton at tucows.com>
>
> > *Date: *Monday, August 15, 2016 at 12:18 PM
>
> > *To: *Krista Papac <krista.papac at icann.org>
>
> > <mailto:krista.papac at icann.org>
>
> > *Cc: *Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>
>
> > <mailto:caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>, "fortier at pointquebec.org"
>
> > <mailto:fortier at pointquebec.org> <fortier at pointquebec.org>
>
> > <mailto:fortier at pointquebec.org>, Jennifer Gore
>
> > <jennifer.gore at icann.org> <mailto:jennifer.gore at icann.org>,
>
> > Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell at endurance.com>
>
> > <mailto:darcy.southwell at endurance.com>
>
> > *Subject: *Re: RRA Amendment Notification for .quebec
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Hello All,
>
> >
>
> > This is to let you know that the RrSG would like to enter into
>
> > consultations with ICANN and registry operator to resolve some
>
> > issues with the proposed amendments.
>
> >
>
> > First, we would like to ensure that it's clear that we
> generally
>
> > consider the below to be reasonably minor, and that we look
>
> > forward to working with .quebec to iron out these differences.
>
> >
>
> > Section 3.11 on Bulk Transfers: We're unclear about what this
>
> > section means, and are looking for more explanation or intent.
>
> >
>
> > Section 5.1 on Amounts and Price changes: The agreement is
>
> > proposing 90 days notice for price changes. While the RrSG is
>
> > /very /pleased to see this applied to changes to new
> domains, we
>
> > want to ensure that the minimum notification of 180 days for
>
> > renewals as per the RA still applies.
>
> >
>
> > Section 5.2 on Payment: There is a typo, and it's unclear if
>
> > the Registry is giving fifteen or 30 days to cure payment
>
> > default. We would like to know which one it is.
>
> >
>
> > Hopefully we can work through these quickly.
>
> >
>
> > Thanks
>
> >
>
> > Graeme
>
> >
>
> > On 2016-07-25 1:57 PM, Krista Papac wrote:
>
> >
>
> > Dear Graeme,
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Attached, please find the cover letter and the
> red-lined RRA
>
> > Amendment for .quebec submitted by PointQuébec Inc to be
>
> > shared with your Stakeholder Group.
>
> >
>
> > Per the RRA Amendment Procedure, the RrSG has up to 21
> days
>
> > to review the proposed changes. If the registrars have
>
> > concerns, please advise ICANN by responding to this
> message
>
> > no later than 23:59UTC on 15 August 2016. If there is no
>
> > response by this time, ICANN will assume there are no
>
> > concerns and will continue processing the request. If the
>
> > RrSG responds with concerns, ICANN will continue to
> the next
>
> > step of the RRA Amendment Procedure which is to
> consult with
>
> > the RrSG and the Registry Operator.
>
> >
>
> > If you have any further inquiries, please let me know.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Kind regards,
>
> >
>
> > Krista
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Krista Papac
>
> >
>
> > Director, Registry Services & Engagement
>
> >
>
> > ICANN – Global Domains Division
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > o: +1 310 578 8937
>
> >
>
> > m: +1 714 756 0201
>
> >
>
> > e: krista.papac at icann.org <mailto:krista.papac at icann.org>
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > 12025 Waterfront Avenue, Suite 300
>
> >
>
> > Los Angeles, CA 90094
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > www.icann.org[icann.org]
>
> >
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.icann.org&d=DQMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=FtAQ3W6bLN46TgSZKvQ7yaWgXCLkUXAcjopsZnUkWVo&m=sw_9DKv_9-7oiWj4W9nnlhr_axICb0dpft9dwcrS6YQ&s=NcSSODUr7j_FzEyKEvkg5TrD9qwn4RR2iUJ2OERl3wY&e=>
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > --
>
> >
>
> > _________________________
>
> >
>
> > Graeme Bunton
>
> >
>
> > Manager, Analytics and Insights
>
> >
>
> > Manager, Public Policy
>
> >
>
> > Tucows Inc.
>
> >
>
> > PH: 416 535 0123 ext 1634
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > --
>
> >
>
> > _________________________
>
> >
>
> > Graeme Bunton
>
> >
>
> > Manager, Analytics and Insights
>
> >
>
> > Manager, Public Policy
>
> >
>
> > Tucows Inc.
>
> >
>
> > PH: 416 535 0123 ext 1634
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > --
>
> >
>
> > _________________________
>
> >
>
> > Graeme Bunton
>
> >
>
> > Manager, Analytics and Insights
>
> >
>
> > Manager, Public Policy
>
> >
>
> > Tucows Inc.
>
> >
>
> > PH: 416 535 0123 ext 1634
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > --
>
> > _________________________
>
> > Graeme Bunton
>
> > Manager, Management Information Systems
>
> > Manager, Public Policy
>
> > Tucows Inc.
>
> > PH: 416 535 0123 ext 1634
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > _______________________________________________
>
> > Rra-review mailing list
>
> > Rra-review at icann-registrars.org
>
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__icann-2Dregistrars.org_mailman_listinfo_rra-2Dreview-5Ficann-2Dregistrars.org&d=DgID-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=u_pb6WMx9CDXwjOKrHn1HnALowUgYQJOgorfpvcN8gE&m=BYCa_rAtbAgWwzerLqXA6Jv_lN2IbYSsASFXz8D824w&s=3l1v8xWHq5SBWzZbPu0EfjS8Tw-hc8WN4ALiTrvxlo8&e=
>
>
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Met vriendelijke groet,
>
>
>
> Siemen Roorda
>
> Product developer Openprovider
>
>
>
> Hosting Concepts B.V.
>
> Willem Buytewechstraat 40
>
> 3024 BN Rotterdam
>
> The Netherlands
>
> Tel +31 (0)10 448 22 96
>
> Fax +31 (0)10 244 02 50
>
>
>
> www.openprovider.nl www.twitter.com/openprovider
>
> www.openprovider.co.uk www.twitter.com/openprovider_en
>
> www.openprovider.es www.twitter.com/openprovider_es
>
>
>
> The information contained in this communication is confidential and may
>
> be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the
>
> individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to
>
> receive it. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby (a):
>
> notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action
>
> with respect to the content of this information is strictly prohibited
>
> and may be unlawful, and (b): kindly requested to inform the sender
>
> immediately and destroy any copies.
>
>
>
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Siemen Roorda
Product developer Openprovider
Hosting Concepts B.V.
Willem Buytewechstraat 40
3024 BN Rotterdam
The Netherlands
Tel +31 (0)10 448 22 96
Fax +31 (0)10 244 02 50
www.openprovider.nl www.twitter.com/openprovider
www.openprovider.co.uk www.twitter.com/openprovider_en
www.openprovider.es www.twitter.com/openprovider_es
The information contained in this communication is confidential and may
be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the
individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to
receive it. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby (a):
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action
with respect to the content of this information is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful, and (b): kindly requested to inform the sender
immediately and destroy any copies.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PQC_RRA_20170301.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 340083 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/registrars/attachments/20170310/0fba2fb1/PQC_RRA_20170301.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4689 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/registrars/attachments/20170310/0fba2fb1/smime.p7s>
More information about the registrars
mailing list