<HTML><BODY style="word-wrap: break-word; -khtml-nbsp-mode: space; -khtml-line-break: after-white-space; "><DIV>are you saying here that in your view the two behaviors referenced in the ICANN advisory, namely i) denying transfers in the grace period and ii) denying transfers for any change in whois information, are allowed for in the current policy? or are you saying they should be?</DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV>Regards</DIV><BR><DIV><DIV>On 26-Sep-07, at 12:15 PM, John Berryhill wrote:</DIV><BR class="Apple-interchange-newline"><BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><P style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px"><FONT face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">The transfers policy has been very effective at eliminating certain</FONT></P> <P style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px"><FONT face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">practices, of which we need not recite the history, that were clearly</FONT></P> <P style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px"><FONT face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">directed at shaking down registrants for renewals while denying transfers.</FONT></P> <P style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px"><FONT face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">The policy does allow room for registrants to consent to a variety of</FONT></P> <P style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px"><FONT face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">practices which are motivated by security.</FONT></P> </BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR></BODY></HTML>