[RSSAC Caucus] [RSS Metrics] Update on the RSS Metrics document

[Karl Reuss]

I was able to see the comments in the pdf attachment.  Here are my thoughts on some of comments:


Comment3/4 - I think the paragraph in question expands on the ending of the previous sentence/paragraph: "and diverse connectivity providers".  To me, having diverse connectivity providers is critical.  Unlike root servers that typically peer with many providers at a facility, vantage points will most likely have a connection to a single provider (ISP) who may have a very different routing policy than the another ISP three racks over.  My vote is to leave the additional paragraph in to reinforce the connectivity diversity recommendation.


Comment 8 - I may have started the discussion on this point.  After reviewing some publication latency data I envisioned a worst case scenario where a root could have horrible publishing latency to slightly less than half the vantage points and still have a great median, so I threw a comment in the doc right before hoping on a plane.  After some thought I decided this was an unrealistic contrived scenario, and that publication latency isn't that different from our other metrics.   My thought is to leave it 'median' for consistency.

-Karl


On 12/3/19 5:38 PM, Steve Sheng wrote:
>
> Dear Metrics WP,
>
>  
>
>   Please see the attached document in PDF that shows the remaining areas (with comments) that needs to be addressed.
>
>  
>
>  The google doc is in view only mode, so you might not be able to see all these comments.
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vC2OTSOdWKjmUQanYx4ZlUGnu-5npwvJzRRSFg1BjQE/edit?usp=sharing
>
>  
>
> Best
>
> Steve
>
>  
>
> *From: *Steve Sheng <steve.sheng at icann.org>
> *Date: *Wednesday, November 27, 2019 at 12:12 PM
> *To: *"rssac-caucus at icann.org" <rssac-caucus at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[RSS Metrics] Update on the RSS Metrics document
>
>  
>
> Dear RSS Metrics WP,
>
>  
>
>   Following the RSS metrics discussions at ICANN66 and IETF106,  the work party co-chair and staff worked on the document to address your comments.
>
>  
>
>   We have identified a few outstanding comments to be discussed at the upcoming WP call. But otherwise, the document is stable. Therefore, the staff has put the document into view only mode.
>
>  
>
>   If you have any substantial comments please submit them directly to the mailing list with alternative wording.
>
>  
>
>  If you have copy-edit comments, please submit them to Steve Sheng (steve.sheng at icann.org <mailto:steve.sheng at icann.org>).
>
>  
>
> Best
>
> Steve
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rssac-caucus mailing list
> rssac-caucus at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rssac-caucus
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rssac-caucus/attachments/20191204/cbd7c581/attachment.html>