[RSSAC Caucus] [Ext] TCP and TC (was Updating the RSSAC FAQ)

[Paul Hoffman]

On May 4, 2020, at 11:34 AM, Paul Vixie <paul at redbarn.org> wrote:
> so, to the question i think fred meant to ask, TCP fallback is an expectation 
> we can have, and it's full-resolver behaviour that we can rely on, even if 
> some full resolvers don't support TCP fallback and rely on UDP fragmentation.

In my mind, it is fine to say that RSSAC (or some other RSS-y body) expects resolvers to be able to do TCP fallback. That is, some or all of the RSS will act based on that expectation being fulfilled.

--Paul Hoffman
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3935 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rssac-caucus/attachments/20200504/4c37e02c/smime.p7s>