[RSSAC Caucus] RFC7720 vs RSSAC001 Was: RSSAC001v2 WP Meeting#2 Notes

[Marc Blanchet]

> Le 29 août 2022 à 13:16, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at icann.org> a écrit :
> 
> On Aug 29, 2022, at 9:33 AM, Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet at viagenie.ca> wrote:
>> I think RFC7720 and RSSAC001 should remain (structurally) as they are:  RFC7720 is referenced in RSSAC001. When needed, IETF may update its own RFC7720 on his own pace based on its view, and RSSAC001 can be updated at its own pace too.
> 
> Those seem fine to me. However:
> 
>> I don’t think it is a good idea to fold/copy RFC7720 into RSSAC001. 
> 
> Can you say more about this?
> 
> To me, the eight simple requirements in RFC 7720 could *also* fit into 001v2 as RSSAC expectations on root server operators. Some of them are already enumerated in the RSSAC055 principles. Why not put them in a document of expectations?

Maybe it is my  misunderstanding of the « fold » word. (Again I was not part of the call, sorry). I’ve seen other SDOs literally copy a whole RFC and inevitably start modifying it in their own local copy.  If the intent is to make citations/extracts with proper reference, then I’m fine. I just want to avoid the above case.

Marc.

> 
> --Paul Hoffman
>