[RSSAC Caucus] Annual RSSAC FAQ Review

Paul Hoffman paul.hoffman at icann.org
Tue Dec 20 15:26:02 UTC 2022


On Dec 20, 2022, at 4:21 AM, Andrew McConachie <andrew.mcconachie at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for everyone who joined the productive to review the RSSAC FAQ comments on December 15th.
> 
> I had an action item to clean up the document and merge the decisions that were made on the call.
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_OOt0EBmEqkH5fCXWK4ts8946C7qeI6okDXtK0qoLCs/>
> 
> I’ve done that and there are no outstanding suggestions in the Google doc. If you have any final comments please get them in the Google doc before January 3rd, 2023. 

I have made a few small editorial changes. However, I still have a deep concern about question 4.2. If we answer it honestly, it's only going to confuse readers. I propose that we remove it.

--Paul Hoffman



More information about the rssac-caucus mailing list