[RSSAC Caucus] RFC7701bis and RSSAC001 update proposal: require NSID

Wes Hardaker hardaker at isi.edu
Wed Mar 1 14:57:05 UTC 2023


>
>
> It could. My point is that there could be all sorts of technical
> requirements that RSOs may do, but is not “required” from the perspective
> of IETF.
>

I'm confused.  The current text proposal puts the support for returning an
NSID field as a MUST.  Doesn't that make it a requirement?

[there is a SHOULD discussion around the contents of the field]

-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rssac-caucus/attachments/20230301/5454eb88/attachment.html>


More information about the rssac-caucus mailing list