[RSS GWG] Update on timing?

[Ted Hardie]

Hi Brad,

Thanks for the estimate.  I will assume, then, that we are not aiming for
October 7th, but that we will decide when to meet upon receipt of the
document from RSSAC.

regards,

Ted

On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 11:53 PM Verd, Brad <bverd at verisign.com> wrote:

> Ted,
>
>
>
> I don’t have a timeframe for the RSSAC turnaround all I can share is the
> procedures that RSSAC follows for its publications as defined in RSSAC000
> procedures document.  There are a number of variables that impact the
> timeline and we won’t know until it gets to RSSAC.  It could be as short as
> a week if there is little to no discussion, but I were to speculate, I
> would guess it would be something like 2-3 weeks.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Brad
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Ted Hardie <ted.ietf at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, September 14, 2021 at 12:01 PM
> *To: *"Verd, Brad" <bverd at verisign.com>
> *Cc: *"liman at netnod.se" <liman at netnod.se>, "hotta at jprs.co.jp" <
> hotta at jprs.co.jp>, "rssgwg at icann.org" <rssgwg at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] Re: Update on timing?
>
>
>
> *Caution:* This email originated from outside the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
> Hi Brad,
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> I note that you said "sent to the RSSAC for publication"; do you
> anticipate the RSSAC turning that around essentially upon receipt?
>
> Or is there a process on the RSSAC side as well?
>
>
>
> I ask because our first meeting after the 23rd would be October 7th.  If
> RSSAC processing is a separate process, that likely would not be possible,
> but if it is simply a  turnaround, that could.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Ted
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 4:51 PM Verd, Brad <bverd at verisign.com> wrote:
>
> Ted,
>
>
>
> The RSOs met yesterday and I was tasked with reaching out to you, you beat
> me to it.
>
>
>
> We have made tremendous progress on the consensus driven Success Criteria
> document. The RSOs take their responsibility seriously and hence a high
> level of care is being embraced.  We have a 2 day workshop at the end of
> this month to go through the document to ensure we are have reached full
> consensus on the contents.   The output of the workshop will be a completed
> document that will be turned over to RSSAC for adoption.
>
>
>
> Give that our workshop is currently scheduled after our currently
> scheduled RSO/GWG meeting, it is our recommendation that we cancel the
> meeting on the 23rd.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Brad
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Ted Hardie <ted.ietf at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, September 14, 2021 at 9:22 AM
> *To: *"Verd, Brad" <bverd at verisign.com>, Lars-Johan Liman <liman at netnod.se>,
> "hotta at jprs.co.jp" <hotta at jprs.co.jp>
> *Cc: *"rssgwg at icann.org" <rssgwg at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] Update on timing?
>
>
>
> *Caution:* This email originated from outside the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
> Hi Brad, Lars-Johan, Hiro,
>
>
>
> May I ask if there is any update to the expected timing of the document to
> be produced by the RSOs?
>
>
>
> best regards,
>
>
>
> Ted Hardie
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rssgwg/attachments/20210920/1daddff7/attachment.html>