[Rt4-whois] Planning our next steps

Fri Nov 12 10:38:55 UTC 2010

Sarmad, all,

I am about to put such a page together, thanks for having the same idea!

Wilfried

Dr. Sarmad Hussain wrote:

> Dear Emily and All,
> 
> 
> Thanks.  It would be great if we can collate and post links to all the
> relevant documents for WHOIS on the wiki as well, as a reference point on
> various issues for our discussions.    
> 
>  
> 
> Regards,
> Sarmad
> 
>  
> 
> From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On
> Behalf Of Emily Taylor
> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 2:44 PM
> To: rt4-whois at icann.org
> Subject: [Rt4-whois] Planning our next steps
> 
>  
> 
> Dear All
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks for all your contributions to the list over the past day or so. 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Scope and Draft Report outline
> 
> I have uploaded the draft Scope and Report outline documents which our small
> group presented to the Team in our last call.
> 
> During our discussions we agreed that it is more appropriate for all Team
> members to input into these drafts.  Kathy suggested that we break into
> small groups and review the documents.  However, I'm not sure that we agreed
> the composition of the small groups (I'm sure I'll be corrected if I'm wrong
> on this!!), so in the meantime, please can everyone comment individually.
> If we're unable to sign them off at our next call, then we'll go for the
> small groups approach.
> 
>  
> 
> Using the Wiki
> 
> Personally, I've never used a Wiki in this way before, and I like it!  This
> is going to make our life much easier as we work on shared documents.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Meetings
> 
> Sharon has raised the issue of planning ahead, and her point is well made.
> Many of the team have huge demands on their diary, and I would like to make
> some straw man proposals as follows:
> 
>  
> 
> Cartagena
> 
> We have agreed to a 120 minute meeting, with remote participation, and
> encourage those present in Cartagena to spend time getting to know each
> other.
> 
> As I will not be present in Cartagena, I would like Kathy as Vice Chair to
> run that session please.
> 
>  
> 
> London
> 
> Please would the staff run a doodle on London meeting dates.  Bill has
> proposed  18-20th as a starting point.
> 
>  
> 
> I propose that we have a day and a half for our substantive session.  We
> should aim to arrive the night before for an informal dinner, and social
> session.  I would also like to include a couple of speaking slots plus Q&A
> from external stakeholders.
> 
>  
> 
> I suggest the following items to be covered at our first full meeting, in
> London 
> 
>  
> 
> -  Review stakeholder identification work (or start it if it hasn't been
> done) - this can include the questions raised on our last call, like "what
> is meant by law enforcement, or consumer trust" from a global perspective.
> 
>  
> 
> -  Run a brainstorming session on the legitimate interests of each
> stakeholder group.
> 
>  
> 
> - What is ICANN's policy at the moment?  Would any member of the Team be in
> a position to do a presentation on this?  Or should we invite someone from
> the staff to cover this point?
> 
>  
> 
> - Reviewing our Scope, what don't we know, and what information do we need?
> How do we get it, and do we need independent assistance?
> 
>  
> 
> - Planning our outreach:  who do we need to speak to within the ICANN
> Community?  Can we also think about who *outside* the community needs to
> give input?  How do we structure our outreach. I'd like to get as many of
> the Team involved in reaching back to their sponsoring communities
> throughout our work.
> 
>  
> 
> I'd also like to try and agree a work schedule and allocate some roles/small
> groups on particular issues.  I think it would work best if we identify
> someone within the team who would be willing to draw up a straw man GANTT or
> similar rather than "blue sky".
> 
>  
> 
> While we are in Europe, and (I hope) at Sharon's premises, perhaps we could
> invite a representative of European law enforcement, and a data protection
> authority (eg Art 29 group) as we discussed on our last call,  to give us
> their views on what their Whois needs are.  So, we could aim for 2
> presentations plus Q&A sessions, to help inform ourselves.  Please can I
> have your thoughts on this, and any suggestions for speakers. 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Attendance at San Francisco and other ICANN meetings
> 
>  
> 
> I would welcome the Team's thoughts on this.  I'd like to propose the
> following format for all ICANN meetings that time place during our mandate
> 
>  
> 
> - We all aim to have a 1.5 day Team meeting
> 
> - In addition, we should use ICANN meetings for outreach to:
> 
>             - the Supporting Organisations and Advisory Committees
> 
>             - the Board
> 
>             - any local stakeholder groups who are relevant to our task
> 
>  
> 
> I would like to use the outreach sessions to build liaison with the relevant
> SO/ACs, inform them about how and what we're doing, ask them what they think
> we should be doing, and how they can contribute to our task.   Would it be
> possible for those who have been put forward by different SO/ACs to
> accompany the Chair/Vice Chair to those meetings and help lead the
> discussions?
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Budget
> 
> In preparation for our next call, please can we all give some thought to the
> London agenda, and particularly whether or not this group will need to
> commission outside research, as the ATRT has done.  If so, then we need to
> give the Board a heads up as soon as possible, and prepare a revised budget.
> Bill has kindly posted the budget up on the Wiki, so take a look in
> preparation for our next call.
> 
>  
> 
> Chair and staff
> 
> I see part of the Chair's role to liaise with staff on behalf of this Team,
> if any of you have special requests or issues.  This is not to block your
> direct contact with staff, but to offer myself as a resource to you if you
> feel that would be helpful.
> 
>  
> 
> Getting to know you
> 
> I would really appreciate having a call with each of you over the coming
> weeks, so get to know you a bit, understand your background beyond what's up
> there on the site, your views on what this Team should be covering, and
> understand which areas you feel you can particularly contribute to our
> achieving our objectives.  Please can I ask the staff to set up half hour
> calls with me and each of you.  Alice - I'll let you have my availability
> separately.
> 
>  
> 
> Our next call
> 
> I propose that in our next call we focus on:
> 
>  
> 
> - broad brush stakeholder identification, from a global perspective
> 
> - identifying what, if any, external resources we need.
> 
>  
> 
> Please let me have your thoughts on these proposals, and I look forward to
> our next call.
> 
>  
> 
> Best,
> 
>  
> 
> Emily
> 
> Image removed by sender. Emily Taylor Consultant (Internet Law and
> Governance)
> 
> 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK 
> telephone: 01865 582 811   mobile: 07540 049 322 
> emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk
> 
>  
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.869 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3250 - Release Date: 11/11/10
> 12:34:00
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rt4-whois mailing list
> Rt4-whois at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois