From sharon.lemon at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk Mon Dec 13 13:12:22 2010 From: sharon.lemon at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk (sharon.lemon at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:12:22 -0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Hotel booking for our London meeting Message-ID: <87E2F4F00724B74781794CD88DBC997D07215B64@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk> NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Good Morning All from Foggy London, I've lost the plot a little, about who is staying, and for how long in January - but I do have a contract on my desk which secures a number of rooms for our original dates and names at a very good rate (?219 per night bed and breakfast, exclusive of VAT). The numbers I have are: 18th January - 14 rooms booked - 13 names so far - Emily/Kathy/Kim/Omar/Sarmad/Susan/Lynn/Michael/James/Bill/Liz/Denise/Sharon 19th January - 19- rooms booked - 18 names so far -Emily/Kathy/Kim/Lutz/Olivier/Omar/Sarmad/Susan/Wilfried/Lynn/Michael/James/Bill/Liz/Denise/Olof/Alice/Sharon Now that we are likely to have two whole days, it may be that we need some rooms on the night of 20th too?. We have just phoned to see if we can secure additional rooms, and been advised that there are no more available. I believe they mean that there are no more available at this rate, as I tried to book online and there is availability. I have until Wednesday to sign the contract, at which stage I will have to pay 10% of the costs on my corporate credit card (about ?780) - and now we are so close to the event, the full amount if any cancellations or changes at all. The online price for room only is about ?300 per night - so to book by any other method will be much more expensive - but whatever happens now, it is going to be a mish mash of bookings and costs - unless I do not sign the contract and hand the entire booking over to ICANN. The other thing we could do is try another hotel in central London and travel to Docklands each day, or try to find a central London Venue at a hotel - that may work out more cost effective. Would appreciate some direction in this. Sharon This information is supplied in confidence by SOCA, and is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. It may also be subject to exemption under other UK legislation. Onward disclosure may be unlawful, for example, under the Data Protection Act 1998. Requests for disclosure to the public must be referred to the SOCA FOI single point of contact, by email on PICUEnquiries at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk or by telephoning 0870 268 8677. All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20101213/ce9c2ed3/attachment.html From emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk Mon Dec 13 14:13:46 2010 From: emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk (Emily Taylor) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:13:46 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Hotel booking for our London meeting In-Reply-To: <87E2F4F00724B74781794CD88DBC997D07215B64@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk> References: <87E2F4F00724B74781794CD88DBC997D07215B64@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk> Message-ID: <60B76A16-B1F3-4C15-A804-316BB8AE931C@etlaw.co.uk> Many thanks, Sharon The details you have for me are correct. I will not require overnight accommodation for a third night. Kind regards Emily On 13 Dec 2010, at 13:12, wrote: > NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED > > Good Morning All from Foggy London, > > > I've lost the plot a little, about who is staying, and for how long in January - but I do have a contract on my desk which secures a number of rooms for our original dates and names at a very good rate (?219 per night bed and breakfast, exclusive of VAT). The numbers I have are: > > 18th January - 14 rooms booked - 13 names so far - Emily/Kathy/Kim/Omar/Sarmad/Susan/Lynn/Michael/James/Bill/Liz/Denise/Sharon > 19th January - 19- rooms booked - 18 names so far -Emily/Kathy/Kim/Lutz/Olivier/Omar/Sarmad/Susan/Wilfried/Lynn/Michael/James/Bill/Liz/Denise/Olof/Alice/Sharon > > Now that we are likely to have two whole days, it may be that we need some rooms on the night of 20th too?. > > We have just phoned to see if we can secure additional rooms, and been advised that there are no more available. I believe they mean that there are no more available at this rate, as I tried to book online and there is availability. > > I have until Wednesday to sign the contract, at which stage I will have to pay 10% of the costs on my corporate credit card (about ?780) - and now we are so close to the event, the full amount if any cancellations or changes at all. > > The online price for room only is about ?300 per night - so to book by any other method will be much more expensive - but whatever happens now, it is going to be a mish mash of bookings and costs - unless I do not sign the contract and hand the entire booking over to ICANN. > > The other thing we could do is try another hotel in central London and travel to Docklands each day, or try to find a central London Venue at a hotel - that may work out more cost effective. > > Would appreciate some direction in this. > > > Sharon > >> > > This information is supplied in confidence by SOCA, and is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. It may also be subject to exemption under other UK legislation. Onward disclosure may be unlawful, for example, under the Data Protection Act 1998. Requests for disclosure to the public must be referred to the SOCA FOI single point of contact, by email on PICUEnquiries at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk or by telephoning 0870 268 8677. > > > > All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible. > > > > The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20101213/87d57701/attachment.html From Yakushev at dstadvisors.ru Mon Dec 13 14:32:20 2010 From: Yakushev at dstadvisors.ru (Yakushev Mikhail) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:32:20 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Hotel booking for our London meeting In-Reply-To: <60B76A16-B1F3-4C15-A804-316BB8AE931C@etlaw.co.uk> References: <87E2F4F00724B74781794CD88DBC997D07215B64@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk> <60B76A16-B1F3-4C15-A804-316BB8AE931C@etlaw.co.uk> Message-ID: <7C0268D000FB534D8BEDFAD61C5E72A80245F2@OWA.mazal.ru> Sharon, To avoid any possible issues, I'd rather prefer to come to London as early as possible and thus I will need hotel for all three nights. Rgds, Michael From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 5:14 PM To: Cc: belinda.shean at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk; rt4-whois at icann.org; matt.ashtiani at icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Hotel booking for our London meeting Many thanks, Sharon The details you have for me are correct. I will not require overnight accommodation for a third night. Kind regards Emily On 13 Dec 2010, at 13:12, > > wrote: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Good Morning All from Foggy London, I've lost the plot a little, about who is staying, and for how long in January - but I do have a contract on my desk which secures a number of rooms for our original dates and names at a very good rate (?219 per night bed and breakfast, exclusive of VAT). The numbers I have are: 18th January - 14 rooms booked - 13 names so far - Emily/Kathy/Kim/Omar/Sarmad/Susan/Lynn/Michael/James/Bill/Liz/Denise/Sharon 19th January - 19- rooms booked - 18 names so far -Emily/Kathy/Kim/Lutz/Olivier/Omar/Sarmad/Susan/Wilfried/Lynn/Michael/James/Bill/Liz/Denise/Olof/Alice/Sharon Now that we are likely to have two whole days, it may be that we need some rooms on the night of 20th too?. We have just phoned to see if we can secure additional rooms, and been advised that there are no more available. I believe they mean that there are no more available at this rate, as I tried to book online and there is availability. I have until Wednesday to sign the contract, at which stage I will have to pay 10% of the costs on my corporate credit card (about ?780) - and now we are so close to the event, the full amount if any cancellations or changes at all. The online price for room only is about ?300 per night - so to book by any other method will be much more expensive - but whatever happens now, it is going to be a mish mash of bookings and costs - unless I do not sign the contract and hand the entire booking over to ICANN. The other thing we could do is try another hotel in central London and travel to Docklands each day, or try to find a central London Venue at a hotel - that may work out more cost effective. Would appreciate some direction in this. Sharon This information is supplied in confidence by SOCA, and is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. It may also be subject to exemption under other UK legislation. Onward disclosure may be unlawful, for example, under the Data Protection Act 1998. Requests for disclosure to the public must be referred to the SOCA FOI single point of contact, by email on PICUEnquiries at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk or by telephoning 0870 268 8677. All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. [Emily Taylor Consultant (Internet Law and Governance)] 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20101213/8f053343/attachment.html From omar at kaminski.adv.br Mon Dec 13 14:50:46 2010 From: omar at kaminski.adv.br (Omar Kaminski) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 12:50:46 -0200 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Hotel booking for our London meeting In-Reply-To: <7C0268D000FB534D8BEDFAD61C5E72A80245F2@OWA.mazal.ru> References: <87E2F4F00724B74781794CD88DBC997D07215B64@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk> <60B76A16-B1F3-4C15-A804-316BB8AE931C@etlaw.co.uk> <7C0268D000FB534D8BEDFAD61C5E72A80245F2@OWA.mazal.ru> Message-ID: Me too. Since I've lost some discussions about the budget, I assume ICANN will pay our expenses for 18th and 19th, incluing air tickets, hotel and meals. I'm intending to stay a bunch of days more by my own to visit at least Paris and Amsterdam :) Best regards, Omar 2010/12/13 Yakushev Mikhail > Sharon, > > To avoid any possible issues, I?d rather prefer to come to London as early > as possible and thus I will need hotel for all three nights. > > Rgds, > > Michael > > > > *From:* rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] *On > Behalf Of *Emily Taylor > *Sent:* Monday, December 13, 2010 5:14 PM > *To:* > *Cc:* belinda.shean at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk; rt4-whois at icann.org; > matt.ashtiani at icann.org > *Subject:* Re: [Rt4-whois] Hotel booking for our London meeting > > > > Many thanks, Sharon > > > > The details you have for me are correct. I will not require overnight > accommodation for a third night. > > > > Kind regards > > > > Emily > > > > On 13 Dec 2010, at 13:12, <*sharon.lemon at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk*> > <*sharon.lemon at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk* > wrote: > > > > *NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED * > > Good Morning All from Foggy London, > > > > > > I've lost the plot a little, about who is staying, and for how long in > January - but I do have a contract on my desk which secures a number of > rooms for our original dates and names at a very good rate (?219 per night > bed and breakfast, exclusive of VAT). The numbers I have are: > > > > 18th January - 14 rooms booked - 13 names so far - > Emily/Kathy/Kim/Omar/Sarmad/Susan/Lynn/Michael/James/Bill/Liz/Denise/Sharon > > 19th January - 19- rooms booked - 18 names so far > -Emily/Kathy/Kim/Lutz/Olivier/Omar/Sarmad/Susan/Wilfried/Lynn/Michael/James/Bill/Liz/Denise/Olof/Alice/Sharon > > > > Now that we are likely to have two whole days, it may be that we need some > rooms on the night of 20th too?. > > > > We have just phoned to see if we can secure additional rooms, and been > advised that there are no more available. I believe they mean that there > are no more available *at this rate*, as I tried to book online and there > is availability. > > > > I have until Wednesday to sign the contract, at which stage I will have to > pay 10% of the costs on my corporate credit card (about ?780) - and now we > are so close to the event, the full amount if any cancellations or > changes at all. > > > > The online price for room only is about ?300 per night - so to book by any > other method will be much more expensive - but whatever happens now, it is > going to be a mish mash of bookings and costs - unless I do not sign the > contract and hand the entire booking over to ICANN. > > > > The other thing we could do is try another hotel in central London and > travel to Docklands each day, or try to find a central London Venue at a > hotel - that may work out more cost effective. > > > > Would appreciate some direction in this. > > > > > > Sharon > > > > > > This information is supplied in confidence by SOCA, and is exempt from > disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. It may also be subject > to exemption under other UK legislation. Onward disclosure may be unlawful, > for example, under the Data Protection Act 1998. Requests for disclosure to > the public must be referred to the SOCA FOI single point of contact, by > email on *PICUEnquiries at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk*or by telephoning 0870 268 8677. > > > > > > All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment. > Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the > subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and > without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the > Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files > transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom > they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please > contact the sender as soon as possible. > > > > > The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure > Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in > partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On > leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. > Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or > recorded for legal purposes. > > > > [image: Emily Taylor Consultant (Internet Law and Governance)] > > 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK > telephone: *01865 582 811* mobile: *07540 049 322* > *emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk* *www.etlaw.co.uk* > > > > _______________________________________________ > Rt4-whois mailing list > Rt4-whois at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20101213/8a3a4afc/attachment.html From sharon.lemon at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk Mon Dec 13 15:24:06 2010 From: sharon.lemon at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk (sharon.lemon at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:24:06 -0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Urgent information required - London meeting Message-ID: <87E2F4F00724B74781794CD88DBC997D07215B76@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk> NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Dear All, I have received messages from Mikhail, Omar and Lynn that they need accommodation for the 20th Jan (3rd night). Can everyone let me know either way please, about their arrangements for 20th - as the hotel need the information urgently. Today if possible. The good news is that I do not have to pay the deposit, all accounts will be settled on departure and I am only liaible for no-shows. Sharon This information is supplied in confidence by SOCA, and is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. It may also be subject to exemption under other UK legislation. Onward disclosure may be unlawful, for example, under the Data Protection Act 1998. Requests for disclosure to the public must be referred to the SOCA FOI single point of contact, by email on PICUEnquiries at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk or by telephoning 0870 268 8677. All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20101213/b6264cdc/attachment.html From jbladel at godaddy.com Mon Dec 13 18:08:22 2010 From: jbladel at godaddy.com (James M. Bladel) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:08:22 -0700 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Hotel booking for our London meeting Message-ID: <20101213110822.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.4517ccdcf3.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20101213/b5358fcf/attachment.html From kKleiman at pir.org Mon Dec 13 18:11:21 2010 From: kKleiman at pir.org (Kathy Kleiman) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:11:21 -0500 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Hotel booking for our London meeting In-Reply-To: <20101213110822.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.4517ccdcf3.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> References: <20101213110822.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.4517ccdcf3.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> Message-ID: Good for me, too, and enormous thanks to you, Sharon ! Best, Kathy From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 1:08 PM To: sharon.lemon at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk Cc: belinda.shean at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk; matt.ashtiani at icann.org; rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Hotel booking for our London meeting Sharon: The dates are fine for me. If I need to stay an additional night (or arrive earlier), I will make my own arrangements. Thanks-- J. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Rt4-whois] Hotel booking for our London meeting From: Date: Mon, December 13, 2010 7:12 am To: , Cc: belinda.shean at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk, rt4-whois at icann.org, matt.ashtiani at icann.org NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Good Morning All from Foggy London, I've lost the plot a little, about who is staying, and for how long in January - but I do have a contract on my desk which secures a number of rooms for our original dates and names at a very good rate (?219 per night bed and breakfast, exclusive of VAT). The numbers I have are: 18th January - 14 rooms booked - 13 names so far - Emily/Kathy/Kim/Omar/Sarmad/Susan/Lynn/Michael/James/Bill/Liz/Denise/Sharon 19th January - 19- rooms booked - 18 names so far -Emily/Kathy/Kim/Lutz/Olivier/Omar/Sarmad/Susan/Wilfried/Lynn/Michael/James/Bill/Liz/Denise/Olof/Alice/Sharon Now that we are likely to have two whole days, it may be that we need some rooms on the night of 20th too?. We have just phoned to see if we can secure additional rooms, and been advised that there are no more available. I believe they mean that there are no more available at this rate, as I tried to book online and there is availability. I have until Wednesday to sign the contract, at which stage I will have to pay 10% of the costs on my corporate credit card (about ?780) - and now we are so close to the event, the full amount if any cancellations or changes at all. The online price for room only is about ?300 per night - so to book by any other method will be much more expensive - but whatever happens now, it is going to be a mish mash of bookings and costs - unless I do not sign the contract and hand the entire booking over to ICANN. The other thing we could do is try another hotel in central London and travel to Docklands each day, or try to find a central London Venue at a hotel - that may work out more cost effective. Would appreciate some direction in this. Sharon This information is supplied in confidence by SOCA, and is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. It may also be subject to exemption under other UK legislation. Onward disclosure may be unlawful, for example, under the Data Protection Act 1998. Requests for disclosure to the public must be referred to the SOCA FOI single point of contact, by email on PICUEnquiries at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk or by telephoning 0870 268 8677. All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20101213/e7b5bcf1/attachment.html From Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at Tue Dec 14 02:43:17 2010 From: Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at (Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 02:43:17 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Hotel booking for our London meeting In-Reply-To: <87E2F4F00724B74781794CD88DBC997D07215B64@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk> References: <87E2F4F00724B74781794CD88DBC997D07215B64@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk> Message-ID: <4D06D9C5.6070003@CC.UniVie.ac.at> Dear Sharon, RT4, ICANN folks, sharon.lemon at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk wrote: > NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED > > Good Morning All from Foggy London, > > > I've lost the plot a little, about who is staying, and for how long in January - but I do have a contract on my desk which secures a number of rooms for our original dates and names at a very good rate (?219 per night bed and breakfast, exclusive of VAT). The numbers I have are: > > 18th January - 14 rooms booked - 13 names so far - Emily/Kathy/Kim/Omar/Sarmad/Susan/Lynn/Michael/James/Bill/Liz/Denise/Sharon I definitely intend to arrive the evening before the 1.5- or 2-day meeting. So please add me to the list! I don't rate it as feasiable to travel in the morning and be in useful state for the meeting, even assuming that I can arrive in time at all, from Vienna, in January. In case ICANN refuses to cover the expenses for the 1st night - which I do not expect - I have to re-consider my participation. > 19th January - 19- rooms booked - 18 names so far -Emily/Kathy/Kim/Lutz/Olivier/Omar/Sarmad/Susan/Wilfried/Lynn/Michael/James/Bill/Liz/Denise/Olof/Alice/Sharon > > Now that we are likely to have two whole days, it may be that we need some rooms on the night of 20th too?. > > We have just phoned to see if we can secure additional rooms, and been advised that there are no more available. I believe they mean that there are no more available at this rate, as I tried to book online and there is availability. > > I have until Wednesday to sign the contract, at which stage I will have to pay 10% of the costs on my corporate credit card (about ?780) - and now we are so close to the event, the full amount if any cancellations or changes at all. > > The online price for room only is about ?300 per night - so to book by any other method will be much more expensive - but whatever happens now, it is going to be a mish mash of bookings and costs - unless I do not sign the contract and hand the entire booking over to ICANN. > > The other thing we could do is try another hotel in central London and travel to Docklands each day, or try to find a central London Venue at a hotel - that may work out more cost effective. > > Would appreciate some direction in this. > > > Sharon Best regards, set to travel back from Cartagena tomorrow morning, Wilfried. From kim at vonarx.ca Tue Dec 14 03:08:37 2010 From: kim at vonarx.ca (Kim G. von Arx) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:08:37 -0500 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Hotel booking for our London meeting In-Reply-To: <4D06D9C5.6070003@CC.UniVie.ac.at> References: <87E2F4F00724B74781794CD88DBC997D07215B64@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk> <4D06D9C5.6070003@CC.UniVie.ac.at> Message-ID: I tend to agree especially for the ones who come from across multiple time zones. Kim Please excuse my typos! This is sent from my iPhone. On Dec 13, 2010, at 21:43, "Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" wrote: > Dear Sharon, RT4, ICANN folks, > > sharon.lemon at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk wrote: >> NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED >> >> Good Morning All from Foggy London, >> >> >> I've lost the plot a little, about who is staying, and for how long in January - but I do have a contract on my desk which secures a number of rooms for our original dates and names at a very good rate (?219 per night bed and breakfast, exclusive of VAT). The numbers I have are: >> >> 18th January - 14 rooms booked - 13 names so far - Emily/Kathy/Kim/Omar/Sarmad/Susan/Lynn/Michael/James/Bill/Liz/Denise/Sharon > > I definitely intend to arrive the evening before the 1.5- or 2-day meeting. > So please add me to the list! > > I don't rate it as feasiable to travel in the morning and be in useful state > for the meeting, even assuming that I can arrive in time at all, from Vienna, > in January. > > In case ICANN refuses to cover the expenses for the 1st night - which I do > not expect - I have to re-consider my participation. > >> 19th January - 19- rooms booked - 18 names so far -Emily/Kathy/Kim/Lutz/Olivier/Omar/Sarmad/Susan/Wilfried/Lynn/Michael/James/Bill/Liz/Denise/Olof/Alice/Sharon >> >> Now that we are likely to have two whole days, it may be that we need some rooms on the night of 20th too?. >> >> We have just phoned to see if we can secure additional rooms, and been advised that there are no more available. I believe they mean that there are no more available at this rate, as I tried to book online and there is availability. >> >> I have until Wednesday to sign the contract, at which stage I will have to pay 10% of the costs on my corporate credit card (about ?780) - and now we are so close to the event, the full amount if any cancellations or changes at all. >> >> The online price for room only is about ?300 per night - so to book by any other method will be much more expensive - but whatever happens now, it is going to be a mish mash of bookings and costs - unless I do not sign the contract and hand the entire booking over to ICANN. >> >> The other thing we could do is try another hotel in central London and travel to Docklands each day, or try to find a central London Venue at a hotel - that may work out more cost effective. >> >> Would appreciate some direction in this. >> >> >> Sharon > > Best regards, > set to travel back from Cartagena tomorrow morning, > Wilfried. > _______________________________________________ > Rt4-whois mailing list > Rt4-whois at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois From olof.nordling at icann.org Tue Dec 14 11:58:44 2010 From: olof.nordling at icann.org (Olof Nordling) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 03:58:44 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Hotel booking for our London meeting In-Reply-To: <4D06D9C5.6070003@CC.UniVie.ac.at> References: <87E2F4F00724B74781794CD88DBC997D07215B64@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk> <4D06D9C5.6070003@CC.UniVie.ac.at> Message-ID: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7D3504BA6F2@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Wilfried and all, Just so there is no misunderstanding: no problem with the first night, ICANN will reimburse you for that hotel night as well. All the best Olof -----Original Message----- From: Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet [mailto:Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at] Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 3:43 AM To: sharon.lemon at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk Cc: emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk; Olof Nordling; belinda.shean at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk; rt4-whois at icann.org; Matt Ashtiani Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Hotel booking for our London meeting Dear Sharon, RT4, ICANN folks, sharon.lemon at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk wrote: > NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED > > Good Morning All from Foggy London, > > > I've lost the plot a little, about who is staying, and for how long in January - but I do have a contract on my desk which secures a number of rooms for our original dates and names at a very good rate (?219 per night bed and breakfast, exclusive of VAT). The numbers I have are: > > 18th January - 14 rooms booked - 13 names so far - Emily/Kathy/Kim/Omar/Sarmad/Susan/Lynn/Michael/James/Bill/Liz/Denise/Sharon I definitely intend to arrive the evening before the 1.5- or 2-day meeting. So please add me to the list! I don't rate it as feasiable to travel in the morning and be in useful state for the meeting, even assuming that I can arrive in time at all, from Vienna, in January. In case ICANN refuses to cover the expenses for the 1st night - which I do not expect - I have to re-consider my participation. > 19th January - 19- rooms booked - 18 names so far -Emily/Kathy/Kim/Lutz/Olivier/Omar/Sarmad/Susan/Wilfried/Lynn/Michael/James/Bill/Liz/Denise/Olof/Alice/Sharon > > Now that we are likely to have two whole days, it may be that we need some rooms on the night of 20th too?. > > We have just phoned to see if we can secure additional rooms, and been advised that there are no more available. I believe they mean that there are no more available at this rate, as I tried to book online and there is availability. > > I have until Wednesday to sign the contract, at which stage I will have to pay 10% of the costs on my corporate credit card (about ?780) - and now we are so close to the event, the full amount if any cancellations or changes at all. > > The online price for room only is about ?300 per night - so to book by any other method will be much more expensive - but whatever happens now, it is going to be a mish mash of bookings and costs - unless I do not sign the contract and hand the entire booking over to ICANN. > > The other thing we could do is try another hotel in central London and travel to Docklands each day, or try to find a central London Venue at a hotel - that may work out more cost effective. > > Would appreciate some direction in this. > > > Sharon Best regards, set to travel back from Cartagena tomorrow morning, Wilfried. From lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com Tue Dec 14 14:44:35 2010 From: lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com (lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 07:44:35 -0700 Subject: [Rt4-whois] [FWD: Re: ICANN RFI on High Security Zone Verification Program] Message-ID: <20101214074435.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.0c6c9becbc.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20101214/ebb7c321/attachment.html From olof.nordling at icann.org Tue Dec 14 14:55:07 2010 From: olof.nordling at icann.org (Olof Nordling) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 06:55:07 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] [FWD: Re: ICANN RFI on High Security Zone Verification Program] In-Reply-To: <20101214074435.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.0c6c9becbc.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> References: <20101214074435.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.0c6c9becbc.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> Message-ID: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7D3504BA712@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Dear Lynn and all, Since the message below is cc:d to the WHOIS RT list, it is perhaps worthwhile to note that the ?call tomorrow? that?s mentioned isn?t a WHOIS RT call. If WHOIS RT members are invited to it (@Lynn: are they??), I suppose they would need necessary dial-in details etc from you, Lynn. All the best Olof From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 3:45 PM To: Craig Schwartz Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: [Rt4-whois] [FWD: Re: ICANN RFI on High Security Zone Verification Program] Dear All, John Tomaszewski, Chief Counsel from TRUSTe will be joining our conference call tomorrow to share with us input from TRUSTe based on their experience with web privacy seal programs. As a note, TRUSTe has advised that they do not intend to respond to our RFI. They interpreted our RFI as more of "a pure audit function" and not aligned with the type of services they offer. -Lynn -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: ICANN RFI on High Security Zone Verification Program From: Kevin Trilli > Date: Mon, December 13, 2010 7:53 pm To: "lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com Goodendorf" > Cc: John Tomaszewski > Lynn yes, would like a quick sync-up call before the call. I'll give you a call. John our Chief Counsel is going to be joining. He has great experiencing describing the TRUSTe model from top-down globally. Kevin On Dec 13, 2010, at 4:35 PM, > wrote: Hi Kevin, Checking back with you regarding the ICANN conference call this Wednesday at 9:30 am pacific time zone. We have a conference bridge set up: The number for the US is: 1-866-692-5726 Passcode: HSTLD If you would like to have a short chat tomorrow, I'm available. Please feel free to call me on my cell phone: 404-333-3779. Let me know if you plan to speak yourself or have someone else. I would like to make a proper introduction so would like a few brief notes to do that. Thanks again, Lynn -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: ICANN RFI on High Security Zone Verification Program From: Kevin Trilli > Date: Wed, December 01, 2010 5:23 pm To: ">" > Cc: Fran Maier > Lynn: Received, we'll have someone on the call for you if not myself. I'll get back to you later this week.... Kevin On Dec 1, 2010, at 2:02 PM, > wrote: Hi Kevin, Thanks very much for your feedback about the ICANN RFI regarding High Security Top Level Domains. We would greatly appreciate having you or someone from TRUSTe speak to our Advisory Group on a conference call, December 15. We normally schedule the call at 9:00 am Pacific time/ noon, East Coast time. But we could adjust the time of the call if needed. (ICANN, as you may know, is headquartered there in California.) As we finalize our recommendations to ICANN, the input, thinking and views of TRUSTe on these points would help us: -how your seal programs work (at a high level) -how you and others at TRUSTe interpreted our RFI - in particular, how it is different from your current programs. -what would be the ideal way for ICANN to initiate this type of program The concept we are exploring for ICANN would be a voluntary program for Top Level Domain owners and possibly for registries and registrars as well. We want Top Level Domain owners who have invested in higher standards of security to be able to differentiate themselves in some way. As further explanation, so far, the interested parties for the RFI who have contacted ICANN are all auditors. And to the disappointment of our Advisory Group, these audit groups have no interest in administering or overseeing a seal program, although they are interested in being "evaluators". Your response that the RFI seemed to be a pure security audit function seems consistent. So we feel we have missed something or perhaps have not approached this the best way. Please feel free to call me with any questions or to discuss in more detail. Lynn Ms. Lynn Goodendorf, CIPP, CISSP Good Security Consulting LLC 404-333-3779 www.goodsecurityconsulting.com -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: ICANN RFI on High Security Zone Verification Program From: Kevin Trilli > Date: Mon, November 29, 2010 10:45 am To: Craig Schwartz > Cc: Fran Maier >, "lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com" >, Chris Babel > Craig Thanks for follow-up and apologies to Lynn and you for our delayed response. The proposal for the RFI represents a pretty significant shift of our business towards a purer security audit functionality which requires a different strategic direction for TRUSTe. As such we are not going to respond to the RFI. As Lynn and I spoke, we are happy to help the committee with any info we could provide on running a commercial trustmark. Please let us know if we can help you. Thank you for your consideration. Kevin On Nov 29, 2010, at 7:57 AM, "Craig Schwartz" > wrote: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20101214/8f3c210f/attachment.html From craig.schwartz at icann.org Tue Dec 14 14:56:05 2010 From: craig.schwartz at icann.org (Craig Schwartz) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 06:56:05 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] [FWD: Re: ICANN RFI on High Security Zone Verification Program] In-Reply-To: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7D3504BA712@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> References: <20101214074435.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.0c6c9becbc.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7D3504BA712@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Message-ID: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7D3504BA715@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> This appears to be a mistake as the HSTLD-AG has the call tomorrow that Lynn referenced. To all others, please disregard. Craig Schwartz Chief gTLD Registry Liaison ICANN From: Olof Nordling Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 9:55 AM To: lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com; Craig Schwartz Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: RE: [Rt4-whois] [FWD: Re: ICANN RFI on High Security Zone Verification Program] Dear Lynn and all, Since the message below is cc:d to the WHOIS RT list, it is perhaps worthwhile to note that the ?call tomorrow? that?s mentioned isn?t a WHOIS RT call. If WHOIS RT members are invited to it (@Lynn: are they??), I suppose they would need necessary dial-in details etc from you, Lynn. All the best Olof From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 3:45 PM To: Craig Schwartz Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: [Rt4-whois] [FWD: Re: ICANN RFI on High Security Zone Verification Program] Dear All, John Tomaszewski, Chief Counsel from TRUSTe will be joining our conference call tomorrow to share with us input from TRUSTe based on their experience with web privacy seal programs. As a note, TRUSTe has advised that they do not intend to respond to our RFI. They interpreted our RFI as more of "a pure audit function" and not aligned with the type of services they offer. -Lynn -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: ICANN RFI on High Security Zone Verification Program From: Kevin Trilli > Date: Mon, December 13, 2010 7:53 pm To: "lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com Goodendorf" > Cc: John Tomaszewski > Lynn yes, would like a quick sync-up call before the call. I'll give you a call. John our Chief Counsel is going to be joining. He has great experiencing describing the TRUSTe model from top-down globally. Kevin On Dec 13, 2010, at 4:35 PM, > wrote: Hi Kevin, Checking back with you regarding the ICANN conference call this Wednesday at 9:30 am pacific time zone. We have a conference bridge set up: The number for the US is: 1-866-692-5726 Passcode: HSTLD If you would like to have a short chat tomorrow, I'm available. Please feel free to call me on my cell phone: 404-333-3779. Let me know if you plan to speak yourself or have someone else. I would like to make a proper introduction so would like a few brief notes to do that. Thanks again, Lynn -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: ICANN RFI on High Security Zone Verification Program From: Kevin Trilli > Date: Wed, December 01, 2010 5:23 pm To: ">" > Cc: Fran Maier > Lynn: Received, we'll have someone on the call for you if not myself. I'll get back to you later this week.... Kevin On Dec 1, 2010, at 2:02 PM, > wrote: Hi Kevin, Thanks very much for your feedback about the ICANN RFI regarding High Security Top Level Domains. We would greatly appreciate having you or someone from TRUSTe speak to our Advisory Group on a conference call, December 15. We normally schedule the call at 9:00 am Pacific time/ noon, East Coast time. But we could adjust the time of the call if needed. (ICANN, as you may know, is headquartered there in California.) As we finalize our recommendations to ICANN, the input, thinking and views of TRUSTe on these points would help us: -how your seal programs work (at a high level) -how you and others at TRUSTe interpreted our RFI - in particular, how it is different from your current programs. -what would be the ideal way for ICANN to initiate this type of program The concept we are exploring for ICANN would be a voluntary program for Top Level Domain owners and possibly for registries and registrars as well. We want Top Level Domain owners who have invested in higher standards of security to be able to differentiate themselves in some way. As further explanation, so far, the interested parties for the RFI who have contacted ICANN are all auditors. And to the disappointment of our Advisory Group, these audit groups have no interest in administering or overseeing a seal program, although they are interested in being "evaluators". Your response that the RFI seemed to be a pure security audit function seems consistent. So we feel we have missed something or perhaps have not approached this the best way. Please feel free to call me with any questions or to discuss in more detail. Lynn Ms. Lynn Goodendorf, CIPP, CISSP Good Security Consulting LLC 404-333-3779 www.goodsecurityconsulting.com -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: ICANN RFI on High Security Zone Verification Program From: Kevin Trilli > Date: Mon, November 29, 2010 10:45 am To: Craig Schwartz > Cc: Fran Maier >, "lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com" >, Chris Babel > Craig Thanks for follow-up and apologies to Lynn and you for our delayed response. The proposal for the RFI represents a pretty significant shift of our business towards a purer security audit functionality which requires a different strategic direction for TRUSTe. As such we are not going to respond to the RFI. As Lynn and I spoke, we are happy to help the committee with any info we could provide on running a commercial trustmark. Please let us know if we can help you. Thank you for your consideration. Kevin On Nov 29, 2010, at 7:57 AM, "Craig Schwartz" > wrote: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20101214/cc82ea32/attachment.html From lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com Tue Dec 14 14:55:54 2010 From: lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com (lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:55:54 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] [FWD: Re: ICANN RFI on High Security ZoneVerification Program] In-Reply-To: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7D3504BA715@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> References: <20101214074435.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.0c6c9becbc.wbe@email12.secureserver.net><05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7D3504BA712@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org><05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7D3504BA715@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Message-ID: <1896351254-1292338736-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1630052524-@bda283.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> My apology! I sent the message to the wrong list. This was intended for the HSTLD Advisory Group. Lynn Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T -----Original Message----- From: Craig Schwartz Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 06:56:05 To: Olof Nordling; lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: RE: [Rt4-whois] [FWD: Re: ICANN RFI on High Security Zone Verification Program] This appears to be a mistake as the HSTLD-AG has the call tomorrow that Lynn referenced. To all others, please disregard. Craig Schwartz Chief gTLD Registry Liaison ICANN From: Olof Nordling Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 9:55 AM To: lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com; Craig Schwartz Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: RE: [Rt4-whois] [FWD: Re: ICANN RFI on High Security Zone Verification Program] Dear Lynn and all, Since the message below is cc:d to the WHOIS RT list, it is perhaps worthwhile to note that the ?call tomorrow? that?s mentioned isn?t a WHOIS RT call. If WHOIS RT members are invited to it (@Lynn: are they??), I suppose they would need necessary dial-in details etc from you, Lynn. All the best Olof From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 3:45 PM To: Craig Schwartz Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: [Rt4-whois] [FWD: Re: ICANN RFI on High Security Zone Verification Program] Dear All, John Tomaszewski, Chief Counsel from TRUSTe will be joining our conference call tomorrow to share with us input from TRUSTe based on their experience with web privacy seal programs. As a note, TRUSTe has advised that they do not intend to respond to our RFI. They interpreted our RFI as more of "a pure audit function" and not aligned with the type of services they offer. -Lynn -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: ICANN RFI on High Security Zone Verification Program From: Kevin Trilli > Date: Mon, December 13, 2010 7:53 pm To: "lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com Goodendorf" > Cc: John Tomaszewski > Lynn yes, would like a quick sync-up call before the call. I'll give you a call. John our Chief Counsel is going to be joining. He has great experiencing describing the TRUSTe model from top-down globally. Kevin On Dec 13, 2010, at 4:35 PM, > wrote: Hi Kevin, Checking back with you regarding the ICANN conference call this Wednesday at 9:30 am pacific time zone. We have a conference bridge set up: The number for the US is: 1-866-692-5726 Passcode: HSTLD If you would like to have a short chat tomorrow, I'm available. Please feel free to call me on my cell phone: 404-333-3779. Let me know if you plan to speak yourself or have someone else. I would like to make a proper introduction so would like a few brief notes to do that. Thanks again, Lynn -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: ICANN RFI on High Security Zone Verification Program From: Kevin Trilli > Date: Wed, December 01, 2010 5:23 pm To: ">" > Cc: Fran Maier > Lynn: Received, we'll have someone on the call for you if not myself. I'll get back to you later this week.... Kevin On Dec 1, 2010, at 2:02 PM, > wrote: Hi Kevin, Thanks very much for your feedback about the ICANN RFI regarding High Security Top Level Domains. We would greatly appreciate having you or someone from TRUSTe speak to our Advisory Group on a conference call, December 15. We normally schedule the call at 9:00 am Pacific time/ noon, East Coast time. But we could adjust the time of the call if needed. (ICANN, as you may know, is headquartered there in California.) As we finalize our recommendations to ICANN, the input, thinking and views of TRUSTe on these points would help us: -how your seal programs work (at a high level) -how you and others at TRUSTe interpreted our RFI - in particular, how it is different from your current programs. -what would be the ideal way for ICANN to initiate this type of program The concept we are exploring for ICANN would be a voluntary program for Top Level Domain owners and possibly for registries and registrars as well. We want Top Level Domain owners who have invested in higher standards of security to be able to differentiate themselves in some way. As further explanation, so far, the interested parties for the RFI who have contacted ICANN are all auditors. And to the disappointment of our Advisory Group, these audit groups have no interest in administering or overseeing a seal program, although they are interested in being "evaluators". Your response that the RFI seemed to be a pure security audit function seems consistent. So we feel we have missed something or perhaps have not approached this the best way. Please feel free to call me with any questions or to discuss in more detail. Lynn Ms. Lynn Goodendorf, CIPP, CISSP Good Security Consulting LLC 404-333-3779 www.goodsecurityconsulting.com -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: ICANN RFI on High Security Zone Verification Program From: Kevin Trilli > Date: Mon, November 29, 2010 10:45 am To: Craig Schwartz > Cc: Fran Maier >, "lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com" >, Chris Babel > Craig Thanks for follow-up and apologies to Lynn and you for our delayed response. The proposal for the RFI represents a pretty significant shift of our business towards a purer security audit functionality which requires a different strategic direction for TRUSTe. As such we are not going to respond to the RFI. As Lynn and I spoke, we are happy to help the committee with any info we could provide on running a commercial trustmark. Please let us know if we can help you. Thank you for your consideration. Kevin On Nov 29, 2010, at 7:57 AM, "Craig Schwartz" > wrote: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20101214/f6ea9fd1/attachment.html From emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk Thu Dec 16 18:43:29 2010 From: emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk (Emily Taylor) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:43:29 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Proposed call before London meeting - your feedback please. Message-ID: <8CEE0BB3-91CA-4661-8782-32391356BFB1@etlaw.co.uk> Dear all First of all, sorry for missing the call in Cartagena. I had to change travel plans at the last minute because of poor weather, and it just didn't work out. I have had a full debrief from Kathy and reviewed the notes. I understand that the meeting was successful. Thanks to all who contributed. One of the actions that arose out of the meeting was a request for a call before our London meeting. With the holiday season looming, I have a suggestion for this: I suggest that we try a one agenda item call, to see whether we can sign off the Scope of Work document prior to London. I am aware that those who attended Cartagena (whether in person or remotely) made good progress, and there was substantial meeting of minds on amending the working document (posted on the Wiki around mid-November). Kathy will be posting the amended document on the Wiki soon, and I encourage everyone to take a look, and amend if necessary. My suggestion is that we aim for a 1 hour call, either towards the end of the week beginning 3 Jan or any time during the week of 10 Jan. Please can I ask for any objections to this proposal, or alternative suggestions? Kind regards Emily 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20101216/3dd67a95/attachment.html From kKleiman at pir.org Thu Dec 16 20:04:23 2010 From: kKleiman at pir.org (Kathy Kleiman) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:04:23 -0500 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Scope of Work - Wiki updated for Cartagena work Message-ID: Dear All, Tx again to all who participated in our informal Cartagena meeting -- local and remote participation was much appreciated! I circulated notes from our productive brainstorming session. Today I merged those Cartagena notes into our Wiki Scope of Work document. The Scope of Work can be found under "Work in Progress," "Scope of Whois Review Team" at https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Scope+of+Whois+Review+Te am). (If you would like to edit and need the Wiki password, please let me know.) Looking forward to our London meeting! Happy Holidays, Kathy Kleiman Director of Policy .ORG, The Public Interest Registry Direct: +1 703-889-5756 | Mobile:+1 703-371-6846| www.pir.org | Find us on Facebook | .ORG Blog | Flickr | YouTube | Twitter | Confidentiality Note: Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry. If received in error, please inform sender and then delete. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20101216/1569db72/attachment.html From alice.jansen at icann.org Fri Dec 17 09:23:19 2010 From: alice.jansen at icann.org (Alice Jansen) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:23:19 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Draft Agenda for London meeting Message-ID: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7D35077E6E0@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Dear Review Team Members, Please find attached a draft agenda for your session in London. Note that this was drafted by the Chair and Vice-Chair. Please provide your comments and editing suggestions by Friday, 24 December. Thank you, Kind regards Alice -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20101217/89363723/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Agenda London.doc Type: application/msword Size: 43008 bytes Desc: Agenda London.doc Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20101217/89363723/AgendaLondon.doc From emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk Sat Dec 18 09:43:39 2010 From: emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk (Emily Taylor) Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 09:43:39 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Draft agenda for London Message-ID: <83FD125C-0143-4C36-86A0-D5C3E2B40406@etlaw.co.uk> Dear All Thanks, Alice, for circulating the draft agenda for London. I just want to emphasise that this is very much a draft, and I encourage you all to make comments or suggestions on the list and we can then foster a discussion about any points that arise, whether about substantive agenda items or logistics. Kind regards Emily 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20101218/92f7dfc2/attachment.html From omar at kaminski.adv.br Sat Dec 18 12:22:35 2010 From: omar at kaminski.adv.br (Omar Kaminski) Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 10:22:35 -0200 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Draft agenda for London In-Reply-To: <83FD125C-0143-4C36-86A0-D5C3E2B40406@etlaw.co.uk> References: <83FD125C-0143-4C36-86A0-D5C3E2B40406@etlaw.co.uk> Message-ID: Dear Emily, How about the air tickets? Icann didn't contact me untill now. Regards, Omar 2010/12/18 Emily Taylor > Dear All > > Thanks, Alice, for circulating the draft agenda for London. > > I just want to emphasise that this is very much a draft, and I encourage > you all to make comments or suggestions on the list and we can then foster a > discussion about any points that arise, whether about substantive agenda > items or logistics. > > Kind regards > > Emily > [image: Emily Taylor Consultant (Internet Law and Governance)] > > 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK > telephone: * 01865 582 811* mobile: * 07540 049 322* > emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk > > > _______________________________________________ > Rt4-whois mailing list > Rt4-whois at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20101218/27c66ae8/attachment.html