[Rt4-whois] London Meeting -- staff attendance and conference call with Strickling and Beckstrom

[Denise Michel]

Thank you for your response, Emily.

Could you clarify something for me ... in Cartagena I was told that
the Team really wanted to hear from Strickling and Beckstrom together.
Since Strckling has now been scheduled separately (and at a time
Beckstrom currently is not available), am I correct in assuming that
the Team has changed it's mind and will only be speaking with
Strickling during the London meeting?  (which is fine) And that we
don't need to try to find another time on Beckstrom's schedule on the
19th or 20th?  (and if this is the case, do you have another date in
mind?)

Thanks for clarifying.

Denise

Denise Michel
denise.michel at icann.org



On Wednesday, January 5, 2011, Emily Taylor <emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk> wrote:
> Dear Denise, Dear All
> Denise, I am delighted to here that you and other members of the ICANN team will be in attendance at the London meeting, and appreciate your continued support of the Team's work.
> All, I attach an updated draft of the London agenda for your information.  It is more or less the same as that circulated before Christmas, but makes a number of changes in response to comments:
> - Later finish time on second day- Inclusion of "producers" under item 3 (Developing the Definitions)- Discussion with Larry Strickling is inserted as new item 4 (afternoon of first day).  This item is referred to in Denise's mail, and is carried over from the Cartagena meeting.  Denise, if Rod is available to join this discussion, he would be most welcome.  If not, we can schedule for another occasion.
> Your other question, Denise, is I hope answered by the agenda on day 2 (item 6(a)).  If anything is unclear, Kathy or I will be happy to give you a briefing.
> I look forward to receiving any final comments by the end of Friday.  In the absence of any comments, we will take this agenda as agreed prior to the meeting.
> Kind regards
> Emily