[Rt4-whois] London Meeting -- staff attendance andconference call with Strickling and Beckstrom

Fri Jan 7 09:00:38 UTC 2011

I'd like to echo Bill, asking for a *very rough* draft or list of
*suggestions* regarding physical (or other) meetings.

It is much easier for me to tentatively block some more slots as early
as possible and to relase some of them later on, rather than having to
cancel or move other activities that have been agreed already.

Btw, the Address Council yesterday agreed to have our monthly phone
conferences on the 1st Thursday each month, starting at 16:00 UTC.

Due to collision with other major events, for May and November 2011
the calls will be held on the 2nd Thursday: May 12th and November 10th.

Wilfried.

Emily Taylor wrote:

> Hi Bill
> 
> Kathy and I will do our best to get some ideas out there to the group
> prior to the meeting.  As Kathy said, these could only be proposals
> until the group has the chance to discuss (unless we manage to all agree
> it on the list), but it will certainly get the ball rolling.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> Emily
> 
> On 5 Jan 2011, at 22:12, Smith, Bill wrote:
> 
>> Kathy,
>>
>> I suggest that we can test for agreement via email, phone, or
>> in-person. If a proposal won't be available until London, there's no
>> need to consider sending earlier.
>>
>> My point is that getting *something* out sooner, rather than later is
>> desirable so that we may begin to consider this as a group.
>>
>> Re a conference call proposal, I believe one was made some time ago to
>> schedule calls on a set day/time at least every fortnight (with the
>> option to hold additional calls on the "off" weeks). We had found a
>> day/time that seemed to work for all or most people and I hope we can
>> continue with that "plan".
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Bill
>>
>> On Jan 5, 2011, at 1:59 PM, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
>>
>> Bill,
>> We can certainly try, but the purpose of sharing a draft at the London
>> meeting was to see whether people agreed with the ideas we share for
>> F2F and conference call meetings.  We can circulate something, but I
>> don’t think we will finalize until then.
>>
>> Best,
>> Kathy
>>
>> From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org>
>> [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Smith, Bill
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 4:20 PM
>> To: Emily Taylor; denise.michel at icann.org<mailto:denise.michel at icann.org>
>> Cc: RT4 WHOIS
>> Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] London Meeting -- staff attendance
>> andconference call with Strickling and Beckstrom
>>
>> Emily,
>>
>> I see in the draft agenda that you and Kathy plan to present a
>> proposal for meetings. Would it be possible to send that out in
>> advance of the meeting, perhaps this week? My calendar is filling up
>> and I continue to make other commitments as requests  come in.
>>
>> At present, I have nothing blocked out for the WHOIS Review except
>> ICANN meeting weeks. If we plan on meeting at other times, it would be
>> good to know that as soon as possible.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Bill
>>
>> From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org>
>> [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 10:18 AM
>> To: denise.michel at icann.org<mailto:denise.michel at icann.org>
>> Cc: RT4 WHOIS
>> Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] London Meeting -- staff attendance and
>> conference call with Strickling and Beckstrom
>>
>> Dear Denise, Dear All
>>
>> Denise, I am delighted to here that you and other members of the ICANN
>> team will be in attendance at the London meeting, and appreciate your
>> continued support of the Team's work.
>>
>> All, I attach an updated draft of the London agenda for your
>> information.  It is more or less the same as that circulated before
>> Christmas, but makes a number of changes in response to comments:
>>
>> - Later finish time on second day
>> - Inclusion of "producers" under item 3 (Developing the Definitions)
>> - Discussion with Larry Strickling is inserted as new item 4
>> (afternoon of first day).  This item is referred to in Denise's mail,
>> and is carried over from the Cartagena meeting.  Denise, if Rod is
>> available to join this discussion, he would be most welcome.  If not,
>> we can schedule for another occasion.
>>
>> Your other question, Denise, is I hope answered by the agenda on day 2
>> (item 6(a)).  If anything is unclear, Kathy or I will be happy to give
>> you a briefing.
>>
>> I look forward to receiving any final comments by the end of Friday.
>>  In the absence of any comments, we will take this agenda as agreed
>> prior to the meeting.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Emily
>>
> 
> Emily Taylor Consultant (Internet Law and Governance)
> 
> 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
> telephone: * 01865 582 811*   mobile: * 07540 049 322*
> emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk <mailto:emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk>
> www.etlaw.co.uk <http://www.etlaw.co.uk>
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rt4-whois mailing list
> Rt4-whois at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois