From oiteanu at iteanu.com Mon Jan 17 08:21:38 2011 From: oiteanu at iteanu.com (Olivier ITEANU) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:21:38 +0100 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Discussion paper on consumer trust Message-ID: <4D340A22.12528.33EA5C0@oiteanu.iteanu.com> Dear all You will find attached a short discussion paper on consumer trust done by Sarmad and myself. Due to the lack of time, I produce the last version without asking Sarmad for his approval. Sarmad will be free to criticize :-) as each of you. Hope it's ok and will allow an open debate. See you in London. Olivier. Olivier ITEANU - mailto:oiteanu at iteanu.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- I T E A N U Soci?t? d'Avocats - Law Firm 164, rue du Faubourg Saint-Honore 75008 PARIS Tel. + 33 (0)1 42 56 90 00 Fax + 33 (0)1 42 56 90 02 e-mail: contact at iteanu.com - www.iteanu.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- -------------- next part -------------- The following section of this message contains a file attachment prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format. If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any other MIME-compliant system, you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer. If you cannot, please ask your system administrator for assistance. ---- File information ----------- File: Consumer_draft1.doc Date: 16 Jan 2011, 20:21 Size: 31232 bytes. Type: Unknown -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Consumer_draft1.doc Type: application/octet-stream Size: 31232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110117/ea68dacc/Consumer_draft1.doc From Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at Mon Jan 17 16:02:18 2011 From: Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at (Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:02:18 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] ...related to London mtg., section I.A. Message-ID: <4D34680A.6050609@CC.UniVie.ac.at> ...while this is a tad technical, it may be of interest in due course: "Technical Evolution of the Whois Service" http://cartagena39.icann.org/node/15423 Wilfried. From kKleiman at pir.org Mon Jan 17 16:07:40 2011 From: kKleiman at pir.org (Kathy Kleiman) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:07:40 -0500 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Discussion paper on consumer trust In-Reply-To: <4D340A22.12528.33EA5C0@oiteanu.iteanu.com> References: <4D340A22.12528.33EA5C0@oiteanu.iteanu.com> Message-ID: Excellent, tx you so much Olivier! -----Original Message----- From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Olivier ITEANU Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 3:22 AM To: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: [Rt4-whois] Discussion paper on consumer trust Dear all You will find attached a short discussion paper on consumer trust done by Sarmad and myself. Due to the lack of time, I produce the last version without asking Sarmad for his approval. Sarmad will be free to criticize :-) as each of you. Hope it's ok and will allow an open debate. See you in London. Olivier. Olivier ITEANU - mailto:oiteanu at iteanu.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- I T E A N U Soci?t? d'Avocats - Law Firm 164, rue du Faubourg Saint-Honore 75008 PARIS Tel. + 33 (0)1 42 56 90 00 Fax + 33 (0)1 42 56 90 02 e-mail: contact at iteanu.com - www.iteanu.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- From kKleiman at pir.org Mon Jan 17 16:12:49 2011 From: kKleiman at pir.org (Kathy Kleiman) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:12:49 -0500 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Quick question: Tues night Message-ID: Hi All, Just wondering who will be in on Tuesday night by 7 or 8pm -- and interested in joining us for an informal round of drinks? Feel free to respond to me privately. Best, Kathy Kleiman Director of Policy .ORG, The Public Interest Registry Direct: +1 703-889-5756 | Mobile:+1 703-371-6846| www.pir.org | Find us on Facebook | .ORG Blog | Flickr | YouTube | Twitter | Confidentiality Note: Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry. If received in error, please inform sender and then delete. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110117/40ca86aa/attachment.html From Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at Mon Jan 17 16:14:25 2011 From: Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at (Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:14:25 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Teleconference Timing In-Reply-To: <17851D27-902C-4D32-A2D3-DDE9AE06C95F@paypal.com> References: <17851D27-902C-4D32-A2D3-DDE9AE06C95F@paypal.com> Message-ID: <4D346AE1.8000000@CC.UniVie.ac.at> Thanks, Bill! I do see the beauty of trying to distribute the pain as evenly as possible, but I would like to submit the comment that (for me) a recurring slot at a fixed day+time-combination makes scheduling a lot easier. Smith, Bill wrote: > Attached is a table of world timezones with time-of-day for in each locale for every hour of the day. Green rows indicate "our" timezones and yellow columns are my best guess for possible, regular meeting times where none of us is "severely" inconvenienced; no meeting starting before 05:00 or after 00:00. > > Using that metric, I've indicated in yellow, three columns for possible, standard meeting times. > > There are other possibilities, like shifting meeting times in eight hour increments thereby "spreading the pain". I've used this mechanism in the past to accommodate a different set of timezones with some success, though it does cause everyone to either miss some meetings or require them to participate at less-than-pleasant hours. > > I throw this out as food for thought. I'm not wed to any of the options. Wilfried. From Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at Mon Jan 17 16:22:11 2011 From: Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at (Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:22:11 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Suggested questions for Lawrence Strickling and Fiona Alexander In-Reply-To: <20110114105329.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.5eb2a30371.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> References: <20110114105329.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.5eb2a30371.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> Message-ID: <4D346CB3.8080004@CC.UniVie.ac.at> Regarding Q 5) on consumer trust, I'd be happy to learn whether there was a common understanding about the meaning or definition of that term, amongst the signatories of the AoC? If this was or is the case I'd suggest to ask for sharing that background with the RT. Wilfried. lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com wrote: > Dear All, > > Here are suggested questions for our call with Lawrence Strickling and > Fiona Alexander from the > US Department of Commerce. > > Any additional questions or feedback from all team members are welcome. > I would ask that we agree on a final draft before conveying. > > 1) In considering the Affirmation of Commitments between the US Dept of > Commerce and ICANN, is there general advice or guidance you would like > to offer us as we plan our review work on Whois policy? > > 2) Do you have any particular concerns about Whois policy or > implementation in its current state? > > 3) As clarification on our scope of work, in the course of our review, > if we see opportunities to improve current Whois policy, would you > expect us to include that information in our draft recommendations for > public comment? > > 4) Also as clarification on our scope of work, would you expect us to > consider groups who rely on Whois data who do not fit into the category > of law enforcement or consumers? Two examples are the AntiPhishing > Working Group and parties involved in the Uniform Dispute Resolution > Process. > > 5) Would you expand on the concept of "consumer trust" and its priority > in our review? > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From bill.smith at paypal-inc.com Mon Jan 17 18:23:25 2011 From: bill.smith at paypal-inc.com (Smith, Bill) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:23:25 -0700 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Quick question: Tues night In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3C87EC0C-FC19-4C82-938D-4227A1CDF000@paypal.com> I land early afternoon and would be interested. On Jan 17, 2011, at 8:12 AM, Kathy Kleiman wrote: Hi All, Just wondering who will be in on Tuesday night by 7 or 8pm -- and interested in joining us for an informal round of drinks? Feel free to respond to me privately. Best, Kathy Kleiman Director of Policy .ORG, The Public Interest Registry Direct: +1 703-889-5756 | Mobile:+1 703-371-6846| www.pir.org | Find us on Facebook | .ORG Blog | Flickr | YouTube | Twitter | Confidentiality Note: Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry. If received in error, please inform sender and then delete. From emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk Mon Jan 17 18:54:10 2011 From: emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk (Emily Taylor) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:54:10 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Wednesday morning logistics Message-ID: <101A8214-A0ED-461D-93E6-419FF65D6643@etlaw.co.uk> Hi all Sharon asked me to let you know that one of her staff will be in the hotel lobby at 08:30 am to guide us across to the meeting venue. Best wishes, and safe travels, Emily 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110117/040d5991/attachment.html From sharon.lemon at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk Tue Jan 18 08:58:33 2011 From: sharon.lemon at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk (sharon.lemon at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:58:33 -0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Quick question: Tues night Message-ID: <87E2F4F00724B74781794CD88DBC997D07215C5E@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk> NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Kathy, Have we confirmed a time and location? Sharon Sharon LEMON OBE Deputy Director SOCA 07768 290902 -----Original Message----- From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Kathy Kleiman Sent: 17 January 2011 16:13 To: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: [Rt4-whois] Quick question: Tues night Hi All, Just wondering who will be in on Tuesday night by 7 or 8pm -- and interested in joining us for an informal round of drinks? Feel free to respond to me privately. Best, Kathy Kleiman Director of Policy .ORG, The Public Interest Registry Direct: +1 703-889-5756 | Mobile:+1 703-371-6846| www.pir.org | Find us on Facebook | .ORG Blog | Flickr | YouTube | Twitter | Confidentiality Note: Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry. If received in error, please inform sender and then delete. This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible. This information is supplied in confidence by SOCA, and is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. It may also be subject to exemption under other UK legislation. Onward disclosure may be unlawful, for example, under the Data Protection Act 1998. Requests for disclosure to the public must be referred to the SOCA FOI single point of contact, by email on PICUEnquiries at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk or by telephoning 0870 268 8677. All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110118/e2a6a49d/attachment.html From emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk Tue Jan 18 09:48:18 2011 From: emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk (Emily Taylor) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:48:18 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Meeting logistics, please read Message-ID: Dear all Looking forward to seeing you this evening. Here's a reminder of arrangements for the next few days. 1. Tuesday Evening: Whoever's around, let?s meet in the Hotel?s Cinnamon Bar and Restaurant from 7pm for drinks and dinner. If you are coming in later, don?t worry, we are planning to be there for a good part of the evening. Come join us when you arrive! P.s. please bring your swag/small gifts to the bar for our game. 2. Wednesday AM: meet in Hotel Lobby at 8:30am for our escort to the meeting location (it?s important that we do this together). 3. Wednesday PM: our dinner plans are at the Hazev restaurant, very close to the hotel. To walk together, please meet in Hotel Lobby at 6:45pm. If you want to walk separately, you?ll find a reservation under Kathy/Public Interest Registry?s name, for 7pm: Hazev, Discovery Dock West, 2 South Quay Square, Canary Wharf (in a private room). 4. Thursday AM: meet in Hotel Lobby at 8:30am for our escort to the meeting location See you soon! Emily 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110118/78b0a2f6/attachment.html From sharon.lemon at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk Tue Jan 18 14:58:48 2011 From: sharon.lemon at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk (sharon.lemon at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:58:48 -0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Photographs Message-ID: <87E2F4F00724B74781794CD88DBC997D07215C74@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk> NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Hello Everyone, I have arranged for a photograph to be taken of our group tomorrow morning - if anyone does not wish to be in it, not a problem, please let me know. I would also like to have another of us in the meeting room, during our discussions - a memento for us. Sharon Sharon LEMON OBE Deputy Director SOCA 07768 290902 . This information is supplied in confidence by SOCA, and is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. It may also be subject to exemption under other UK legislation. Onward disclosure may be unlawful, for example, under the Data Protection Act 1998. Requests for disclosure to the public must be referred to the SOCA FOI single point of contact, by email on PICUEnquiries at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk or by telephoning 0870 268 8677. All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110118/f683caa3/attachment.html From lutz at iks-jena.de Tue Jan 18 17:51:03 2011 From: lutz at iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:51:03 +0100 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Quick question: Tues night In-Reply-To: <3C87EC0C-FC19-4C82-938D-4227A1CDF000@paypal.com> References: <3C87EC0C-FC19-4C82-938D-4227A1CDF000@paypal.com> Message-ID: <201101181751.p0IHp6Af030947@belenus.iks-jena.de> > Just wondering who will be in on Tuesday night by 7 or 8pm -- and interested in joining us for an informal round of drinks? Feel free to respond to me privately. I'm in the Marriot due to a missing reservation for tonight. So I'm interested. Please call me at +49-173-3676752 or Room#474. From kKleiman at pir.org Wed Jan 19 07:42:46 2011 From: kKleiman at pir.org (Kathy Kleiman) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 02:42:46 -0500 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Suggested questions for Article 29 speaker In-Reply-To: <20110114182100.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.8a2c3afee3.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> References: <20110114182100.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.8a2c3afee3.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> Message-ID: Dear Lynn and All, What a great night last night! I truly enjoyed meeting everyone face to face! I wanted to share that in setting up the meeting with Larry Strickling a week or so ago, they asked for a few starting questions, and Emily and I shared some that had been discussed in our group. So these are in addition to Lynn?s questions. Plus there should be good time for questions on the call! As promised, let me share questions that have arisen in the Whois Review Team, for which the perspective of drafter and signatory would be most valuable. They include: - What were your goals for the Whois section of the Affirmation of Commitments? - What are your expectations for the product of the Whois Review Team; what do you expect we might report? - Can you offer insight into key terms within our AoC section that are both broad and undefined, including: o ?consumer trust? and ?promotes consumer trust? o ?legitimate needs of law enforcement? o ?applicable laws? - The Review Team has expressed some questions about the AoC as a whole which might arise in this discussion. They include questions about the interests of global Internet users, and how they might factor into our evaluation. We know this discussion will be most valuable for our work going forward! From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 1:21 AM To: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: [Rt4-whois] Suggested questions for Article 29 speaker Dear All, Below are a few suggested questions for an Article 29 speaker regarding EU privacy. If a speaker is not available, I would be happy to adapt these questions to discussion points with the goal of developing next steps in our work regarding privacy issues that have been raised concerning the Whois database. Feedback or additional questions are certainly welcome. 1) In the recently published Strategy for Modernisation of EU Data Protection Rules issued by the Article 29 WG, one of the goals is to increase transparency for individual privacy rights. Would this goal be consistent with current ICANN policy that requires Internet domain name owners to register their contact details in a public database available to all Internet users? 2) Another goal stated in the Modernisation Strategy is to take into account the needs of police and criminal justice. This is one of our review points in the Whois policy and it would be helpful if further insight could be shared. 3) What are your views on Binding Corporate Rules for multi-national organizations with activities both inside and external to the EU? Why have so few multi-national organizations chosen this approach and do you expect any actions to encourage this option? Kind regards to all - have a good weekend! Lynn -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110119/5182f24a/attachment.html From jbladel at godaddy.com Wed Jan 19 09:19:30 2011 From: jbladel at godaddy.com (James M. Bladel) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 02:19:30 -0700 Subject: [Rt4-whois] WiFi Question Message-ID: <20110119021930.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.ace7bbb303.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110119/9a2a685f/attachment.html From olof.nordling at icann.org Wed Jan 19 09:32:51 2011 From: olof.nordling at icann.org (Olof Nordling) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 01:32:51 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] WiFi Question In-Reply-To: <20110119021930.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.ace7bbb303.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> References: <20110119021930.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.ace7bbb303.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> Message-ID: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7D35958B909@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> James, It?s the first of the organizations you mention;-) Best Olof From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 10:20 AM To: RT4 WHOIS Subject: [Rt4-whois] WiFi Question Is the WiFi service provided by SOCA or ICANN? Thank you, J. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110119/6bd82451/attachment.html From alice.jansen at icann.org Wed Jan 19 09:37:15 2011 From: alice.jansen at icann.org (Alice Jansen) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 01:37:15 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Adobe Room Message-ID: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7D35958B90C@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Dear RT Members, Please note that documents are projected in the Adobe room http://icann.adobeconnect.com/whois-review/ Thank you, Kind regards Alice Alice E. Jansen -------------------------- ICANN Assistant, Organizational & Affirmation Reviews alice.jansen at icann.org Direct Dial: +32.2.234.78.64 Mobile: +32.4.73.31.76.56 Office Fax: +32.2.234.78.48 Skype: alice_jansen_icann -------------------------- 6, Rond Point Schuman B-1040 Brussels, Belgium -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110119/67cfe502/attachment.html From denise.michel at icann.org Wed Jan 19 11:24:17 2011 From: denise.michel at icann.org (Denise Michel) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 03:24:17 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Affirmation Message-ID: The Affirmation of Commitments can be found on ICANN's website at: http://icann.org/en/documents/affirmation-of-commitments-30sep09-en.htm And also is included below, FYI. Regards, Denise Denise Michel ICANN Advisor to the President denise.michel at icann.org +1.408.429.3072 mobile +1.310.578.8632 direct 1. This document constitutes an Affirmation of Commitments (Affirmation) by the United States Department of Commerce ("DOC") and the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers ("ICANN"), a not-for-profit corporation. In recognition of the conclusion of the Joint Project Agreement and to institutionalize and memorialize the technical coordination of the Internet's domain name and addressing system (DNS)1, globally by a private sector led organization, the parties agree as follows: 2. The Internet is a transformative technology that will continue to empower people around the globe, spur innovation, facilitate trade and commerce, and enable the free and unfettered flow of information. One of the elements of the Internet's success is a highly decentralized network that enables and encourages decision-making at a local level. Notwithstanding this decentralization, global technical coordination of the Internet's underlying infrastructure - the DNS - is required to ensure interoperability. 3. This document affirms key commitments by DOC and ICANN, including commitments to: (a) ensure that decisions made related to the global technical coordination of the DNS are made in the public interest and are accountable and transparent; (b) preserve the security, stability and resiliency of the DNS; (c) promote competition, consumer trust, and consumer choice in the DNS marketplace; and (d) facilitate international participation in DNS technical coordination. 4. DOC affirms its commitment to a multi-stakeholder, private sector led, bottom-up policy development model for DNS technical coordination that acts for the benefit of global Internet users. A private coordinating process, the outcomes of which reflect the public interest, is best able to flexibly meet the changing needs of the Internet and of Internet users. ICANN and DOC recognize that there is a group of participants that engage in ICANN's processes to a greater extent than Internet users generally. To ensure that its decisions are in the public interest, and not just the interests of a particular set of stakeholders, ICANN commits to perform and publish analyses of the positive and negative effects of its decisions on the public, including any financial impact on the public, and the positive or negative impact (if any) on the systemic security, stability and resiliency of the DNS. 5. DOC recognizes the importance of global Internet users being able to use the Internet in their local languages and character sets, and endorses the rapid introduction of internationalized country code top level domain names (ccTLDs), provided related security, stability and resiliency issues are first addressed. Nothing in this document is an expression of support by DOC of any specific plan or proposal for the implementation of new generic top level domain names (gTLDs) or is an expression by DOC of a view that the potential consumer benefits of new gTLDs outweigh the potential costs. 6. DOC also affirms the United States Government's commitment to ongoing participation in ICANN's Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC). DOC recognizes the important role of the GAC with respect to ICANN decision-making and execution of tasks and of the effective consideration by ICANN of GAC input on the public policy aspects of the technical coordination of the Internet DNS. 7. ICANN commits to adhere to transparent and accountable budgeting processes, fact-based policy development, cross-community deliberations, and responsive consultation procedures that provide detailed explanations of the basis for decisions, including how comments have influenced the development of policy consideration, and to publish each year an annual report that sets out ICANN's progress against ICANN's bylaws, responsibilities, and strategic and operating plans. In addition, ICANN commits to provide a thorough and reasoned explanation of decisions taken, the rationale thereof and the sources of data and information on which ICANN relied. 8. ICANN affirms its commitments to: (a) maintain the capacity and ability to coordinate the Internet DNS at the overall level and to work for the maintenance of a single, interoperable Internet; (b) remain a not for profit corporation, headquartered in the United States of America with offices around the world to meet the needs of a global community; and (c) to operate as a multi-stakeholder, private sector led organization with input from the public, for whose benefit ICANN shall in all events act. ICANN is a private organization and nothing in this Affirmation should be construed as control by any one entity. 9. Recognizing that ICANN will evolve and adapt to fulfill its limited, but important technical mission of coordinating the DNS, ICANN further commits to take the following specific actions together with ongoing commitment reviews **specified below: 9.1 Ensuring accountability, transparency and the interests of global Internet users: ICANN commits to maintain and improve robust mechanisms for public input, accountability, and transparency so as to ensure that the outcomes of its decision-making will reflect the public interest and be accountable to all stakeholders by: (a) continually assessing and improving ICANN Board of Directors (Board) governance which shall include an ongoing evaluation of Board performance, the Board selection process, the extent to which Board composition meets ICANN's present and future needs, and the consideration of an appeal mechanism for Board decisions; (b) assessing the role and effectiveness of the GAC and its interaction with the Board and making recommendations for improvement to ensure effective consideration by ICANN of GAC input on the public policy aspects of the technical coordination of the DNS; (c) continually assessing and improving the processes by which ICANN receives public input (including adequate explanation of decisions taken and the rationale thereof); (d) continually assessing the extent to which ICANN's decisions are embraced, supported and accepted by the public and the Internet community; and (e) assessing the policy development process to facilitate enhanced cross community deliberations, and effective and timely policy development. ICANN will organize a review of its execution of the above commitments no less frequently than every three years, with the first such review concluding no later than December 31, 2010. The review will be performed by volunteer community members and the review team will be constituted and published for public comment, and will include the following (or their designated nominees): the Chair of the GAC, the Chair of the Board of ICANN, the Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information of the DOC, representatives of the relevant ICANN Advisory Committees and Supporting Organizations and independent experts. Composition of the review team will be agreed jointly by the Chair of the GAC (in consultation with GAC members) and the Chair of the Board of ICANN. Resulting recommendations of the reviews will be provided to the Board and posted for public comment. The Board will take action within six months of receipt of the recommendations. Each of the foregoing reviews shall consider the extent to which the assessments and actions undertaken by ICANN have been successful in ensuring that ICANN is acting transparently, is accountable for its decision-making, and acts in the public interest. Integral to the foregoing reviews will be assessments of the extent to which the Board and staff have implemented the recommendations arising out of the other commitment reviews enumerated below. 9.2 Preserving security, stability and resiliency: ICANN has developed a plan to enhance the operational stability, reliability, resiliency, security, and global interoperability of the DNS, which will be regularly updated by ICANN to reflect emerging threats to the DNS. ICANN will organize a review of its execution of the above commitments no less frequently than every three years. The first such review shall commence one year from the effective date of this Affirmation. Particular attention will be paid to: (a) security, stability and resiliency matters, both physical and network, relating to the secure and stable coordination of the Internet DNS; (b) ensuring appropriate contingency planning; and (c) maintaining clear processes. Each of the reviews conducted under this section will assess the extent to which ICANN has successfully implemented the security plan, the effectiveness of the plan to deal with actual and potential challenges and threats, and the extent to which the security plan is sufficiently robust to meet future challenges and threats to the security, stability and resiliency of the Internet DNS, consistent with ICANN's limited technical mission. The review will be performed by volunteer community members and the review team will be constituted and published for public comment, and will include the following (or their designated nominees): the Chair of the GAC, the CEO of ICANN, representatives of the relevant Advisory Committees and Supporting Organizations, and independent experts. Composition of the review team will be agreed jointly by the Chair of the GAC (in consultation with GAC members) and the CEO of ICANN. Resulting recommendations of the reviews will be provided to the Board and posted for public comment. The Board will take action within six months of receipt of the recommendations. 9.3 Promoting competition, consumer trust, and consumer choice: ICANN will ensure that as it contemplates expanding the top-level domain space, the various issues that are involved (including competition, consumer protection, security, stability and resiliency, malicious abuse issues, sovereignty concerns, and rights protection) will be adequately addressed prior to implementation. If and when new gTLDs (whether in ASCII or other language character sets) have been in operation for one year, ICANN will organize a review that will examine the extent to which the introduction or expansion of gTLDs has promoted competition, consumer trust and consumer choice, as well as effectiveness of (a) the application and evaluation process, and (b) safeguards put in place to mitigate issues involved in the introduction or expansion. ICANN will organize a further review of its execution of the above commitments two years after the first review, and then no less frequently than every four years. The reviews will be performed by volunteer community members and the review team will be constituted and published for public comment, and will include the following (or their designated nominees): the Chair of the GAC, the CEO of ICANN, representatives of the relevant Advisory Committees and Supporting Organizations, and independent experts. Composition of the review team will be agreed jointly by the Chair of the GAC (in consultation with GAC members) and the CEO of ICANN. Resulting recommendations of the reviews will be provided to the Board and posted for public comment. The Board will take action within six months of receipt of the recommendations. 9.3.1 ICANN additionally commits to enforcing its existing policy relating to WHOIS, subject to applicable laws. Such existing policy requires that ICANN implement measures to maintain timely, unrestricted and public access to accurate and complete WHOIS information, including registrant, technical, billing, and administrative contact information. One year from the effective date of this document and then no less frequently than every three years thereafter, ICANN will organize a review of WHOIS policy and its implementation to assess the extent to which WHOIS policy is effective and its implementation meets the legitimate needs of law enforcement and promotes consumer trust. The review will be performed by volunteer community members and the review team will be constituted and published for public comment, and will include the following (or their designated nominees): the Chair of the GAC, the CEO of ICANN, representatives of the relevant Advisory Committees and Supporting Organizations, as well as experts, and representatives of the global law enforcement community, and global privacy experts. Composition of the review team will be agreed jointly by the Chair of the GAC (in consultation with GAC members) and the CEO of ICANN. Resulting recommendations of the reviews will be provided to the Board and posted for public comment. The Board will take action within six months of receipt of the recommendations. 10. To facilitate transparency and openness in ICANN's deliberations and operations, the terms and output of each of the reviews will be published for public comment. Each review team will consider such public comment and amend the review as it deems appropriate before it issues its final report to the Board. 11. The DOC enters into this Affirmation of Commitments pursuant to its authority under 15 U.S.C. 1512 and 47 U.S.C. 902. ICANN commits to this Affirmation according to its Articles of Incorporation and its Bylaws. This agreement will become effective October 1, 2009. The agreement is intended to be long-standing, but may be amended at any time by mutual consent of the parties. Any party may terminate this Affirmation of Commitments by providing 120 days written notice to the other party. This Affirmation contemplates no transfer of funds between the parties. In the event this Affirmation of Commitments is terminated, each party shall be solely responsible for the payment of any expenses it has incurred. All obligations of the DOC under this Affirmation of Commitments are subject to the availability of funds. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110119/c0133940/attachment.html From olof.nordling at icann.org Wed Jan 19 11:57:07 2011 From: olof.nordling at icann.org (Olof Nordling) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 03:57:07 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Scope and roadmap document Message-ID: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7D35958B933@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Dear all, Attached is a clear version of the "scope and roadmap" document, for further review as discussed this morning. Best regards Olof -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110119/e6072b81/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Scope and Roadmap of Whois Review Team 20110119 clear .doc Type: application/msword Size: 29184 bytes Desc: Scope and Roadmap of Whois Review Team 20110119 clear .doc Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110119/e6072b81/ScopeandRoadmapofWhoisReviewTeam20110119clear.doc From lutz at iks-jena.de Wed Jan 19 13:35:03 2011 From: lutz at iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:35:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Rt4-whois] Some documents on data protection laws review Message-ID: http://www.edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/webdav/site/mySite/shared/Documents/Consultation/Opinions/2011/11-01-14_Personal_Data_Protection_EN.pdf A comprehensive approach on personal data protection in the European Union This statement requires to design policies to be private by design. From describing the current situation in Europe it requests harmonization and create a new "Right to forget". It deals with the dissonace of law enforcement and the human right of privacy. http://www.ripe.net/ripe/tf/dp/ripe-data-protection-task-force-report.pdf Report of the RIPE Data Protection Task Force Detailed statement how to collect date from end users and publish it as whois data within the legislation of The Netherlands, a more liberal country within the EU. From denise.michel at icann.org Wed Jan 19 15:10:13 2011 From: denise.michel at icann.org (Denise Michel) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 07:10:13 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] GAC principles Message-ID: Larry and Fiona referred to "GAC Whois principles" during their call. Here's a link for them: http://gac.icann.org/system/files/WHOIS_principles.pdf Regards, Denise Denise Michel ICANN Advisor to the President denise.michel at icann.org +1.408.429.3072 mobile +1.310.578.8632 direct -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110119/49b0b551/attachment.html From kKleiman at pir.org Wed Jan 19 16:46:14 2011 From: kKleiman at pir.org (Kathy Kleiman) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:46:14 -0500 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Letter from Article 29 Chair, 2007 Message-ID: Here is the letter from Mr. Peter Schaar, then chair of Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, to Mr. Vint Cerf. http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/schaar-to-cerf-12mar07.pdf Kathy Kleiman Director of Policy .ORG, The Public Interest Registry Direct: +1 703-889-5756 | Mobile:+1 703-371-6846| www.pir.org | Find us on Facebook | .ORG Blog | Flickr | YouTube | Twitter | Confidentiality Note: Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry. If received in error, please inform sender and then delete. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110119/b6605420/attachment.html From jbladel at godaddy.com Wed Jan 19 16:45:29 2011 From: jbladel at godaddy.com (James M. Bladel) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:45:29 -0700 Subject: [Rt4-whois] GAC principles Message-ID: <20110119094529.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.b316a7a79e.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110119/4dee9601/attachment.html From denise.michel at icann.org Wed Jan 19 16:56:56 2011 From: denise.michel at icann.org (Denise Michel) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:56:56 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] GAC principles In-Reply-To: <20110119094529.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.b316a7a79e.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> References: <20110119094529.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.b316a7a79e.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> Message-ID: You're welcome. Not sure who "we" is in your question, but I think it's reasonable. Perhaps this is something for the Team or Peter Nettlefold (as GAC Chair's designee) to consider doing? Regards, Denise Denise Michel ICANN Advisor to the President denise.michel at icann.org +1.408.429.3072 mobile +1.310.578.8632 direct On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 8:45 AM, James M. Bladel wrote: > Thanks, Denise. > > Noting that this is from 2007, perhaps we can ask the GAC to review / > update these principles, or confirm that they are still operative? > > J. > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [Rt4-whois] GAC principles > From: Denise Michel > Date: Wed, January 19, 2011 9:10 am > To: rt4-whois at icann.org > > Larry and Fiona referred to "GAC Whois principles" during their call. > Here's a link for them: > > http://gac.icann.org/system/files/WHOIS_principles.pdf > > Regards, > Denise > > Denise Michel > ICANN > Advisor to the President > denise.michel at icann.org > +1.408.429.3072 mobile > +1.310.578.8632 direct > ------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Rt4-whois mailing list > Rt4-whois at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110119/be5e7d70/attachment.html From jbladel at godaddy.com Wed Jan 19 17:00:06 2011 From: jbladel at godaddy.com (James M. Bladel) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:00:06 -0700 Subject: [Rt4-whois] GAC principles Message-ID: <20110119100006.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.284984c098.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110119/49da9f1a/attachment.html From liz.gasster at icann.org Wed Jan 19 17:02:20 2011 From: liz.gasster at icann.org (Liz Gasster) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:02:20 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] GAC principles In-Reply-To: <20110119094529.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.b316a7a79e.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> References: <20110119094529.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.b316a7a79e.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> Message-ID: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7D35958BA0D@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Hi James, The GAC reiterated and reinforced its continued commitment to those principles in this subsequent letter. See: http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/karlins-to-thrush-16apr08.pdf And the GAC reiterated its interest and concern about studies in this context in its Cairo communiqu?: http://gac.icann.org/system/files/GAC_33_Cairo_Communique.pdf Liz From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of James M. Bladel Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 4:45 PM To: Denise Michel Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] GAC principles Thanks, Denise. Noting that this is from 2007, perhaps we can ask the GAC to review / update these principles, or confirm that they are still operative? J. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Rt4-whois] GAC principles From: Denise Michel > Date: Wed, January 19, 2011 9:10 am To: rt4-whois at icann.org Larry and Fiona referred to "GAC Whois principles" during their call. Here's a link for them: http://gac.icann.org/system/files/WHOIS_principles.pdf Regards, Denise Denise Michel ICANN Advisor to the President denise.michel at icann.org +1.408.429.3072 mobile +1.310.578.8632 direct ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110119/191533b9/attachment.html From lutz at iks-jena.de Wed Jan 19 23:22:56 2011 From: lutz at iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 23:22:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Rt4-whois] Questionare Message-ID: I set up a rough initial version of an online questionare to gather "evidence" on some topics. Ask me tomorrow (or by email) to add questions and (proposed) answers. http://whois-rt4-survey.iks-jena.de/ All points are subject to change. From sharonchallis at aol.com Thu Jan 20 09:36:44 2011 From: sharonchallis at aol.com (Sharon Lemon) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:36:44 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Questionare In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thank you for this Lutz. Do you think we should ask about the user experience - was Whois useful? If so, why? If not, why? And what did they need to do next? Sharon Sent from my iPad On 19 Jan 2011, at 23:22, Lutz Donnerhacke wrote: > I set up a rough initial version of an online questionare to gather > "evidence" on some topics. Ask me tomorrow (or by email) to add questions > and (proposed) answers. > > http://whois-rt4-survey.iks-jena.de/ > > All points are subject to change. > _______________________________________________ > Rt4-whois mailing list > Rt4-whois at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois From lutz at iks-jena.de Thu Jan 20 09:48:51 2011 From: lutz at iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:48:51 +0100 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Questionare In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20110120094851.GB23949@belenus.iks-jena.de> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 09:36:44AM +0000, Sharon Lemon wrote: > Thank you for this Lutz. Do you think we should ask about the user > experience - was Whois useful? If so, why? If not, why? Question added. > And what did they need to do next? So adding an "wishes and suggestion" area? From omar at kaminski.adv.br Thu Jan 20 10:01:50 2011 From: omar at kaminski.adv.br (Omar Kaminski) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:01:50 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Questionare In-Reply-To: <20110120094851.GB23949@belenus.iks-jena.de> References: <20110120094851.GB23949@belenus.iks-jena.de> Message-ID: Great idea, and how about limiting the space to avoid some unnecessary comments? Omar 2011/1/20 Lutz Donnerhacke : > > So adding an "wishes and suggestion" area? > From omar at kaminski.adv.br Thu Jan 20 11:45:35 2011 From: omar at kaminski.adv.br (Omar Kaminski) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:45:35 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Fresh news from Brazil - Project of law for personal data protection Message-ID: http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=pt-BR&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=pt&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww2.camara.gov.br%2Fagencia%2Fnoticias%2FCOMUNICACAO%2F192809-EXECUTIVO-ELABORA-ANTEPROJETO-PARA-PROTECAO-DE-DADOS-PESSOAIS.html&act=url Per my request they are preparing a summary in english. As soon as it's ready I'll post here. It could affet direct or indirectly the .br Whois. Best, Omar From olof.nordling at icann.org Thu Jan 20 13:44:31 2011 From: olof.nordling at icann.org (Olof Nordling) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 05:44:31 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Expense reimbursement Message-ID: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7D35984E6DD@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Dear all, For good measure, I resend the two forms you need for claiming reimbursement of your expenses. Please fill out both, attach copies/scans of your receipts and send as one package to constituency-travel at icann.org (alternatives to email below). All the best Olof PS. As mentioned earlier, there are alternatives to email. Send to the attention of "Constituency Travel" when using: POSTAL ADDRESS: ICANN 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330 Marina del Rey, CA 90292-6601 USA or FAX: +1 310 823 8649 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110120/c5deec10/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Banking Information Form.doc Type: application/msword Size: 45056 bytes Desc: Banking Information Form.doc Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110120/c5deec10/BankingInformationForm.doc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Reimbursement Form.xls Type: application/vnd.ms-excel Size: 65536 bytes Desc: Reimbursement Form.xls Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110120/c5deec10/ReimbursementForm.xls From michel.denise at gmail.com Thu Jan 20 14:09:11 2011 From: michel.denise at gmail.com (Denise Michel) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:09:11 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] ICANN Staff slides Message-ID: Dear Team members: ICANN Staff slides presented at today's meetings are posted on the wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Information+Provided+by+ICANN+Staff Regards, Denise Denise Michel ICANN Advisor to the President denise.michel at icann.org +1.408.429.3072 mobile +1.310.578.8632 direct -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110120/d0ebf416/attachment.html From olof.nordling at icann.org Thu Jan 20 15:46:28 2011 From: olof.nordling at icann.org (Olof Nordling) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 07:46:28 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Scope and Roadmap of Whois Review Team 20110120 clear .doc Message-ID: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7D35984E723@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Dear all, New "draft final" version attached for your final review. I hope I managed to catch all edits, but please scrutinize. Thanks Olof -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110120/9cfd36bc/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Scope and Roadmap of Whois Review Team 20110120 clear .doc Type: application/msword Size: 29696 bytes Desc: Scope and Roadmap of Whois Review Team 20110120 clear .doc Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110120/9cfd36bc/ScopeandRoadmapofWhoisReviewTeam20110120clear.doc From olof.nordling at icann.org Thu Jan 20 16:17:26 2011 From: olof.nordling at icann.org (Olof Nordling) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:17:26 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Scope and Roadmap of Whois Review Team 20110120 clear .doc In-Reply-To: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7D35984E723@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> References: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7D35984E723@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Message-ID: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7D35984E73C@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Dear all, ...and I already noted an omission on my part - I didn't number the paragraphs. Will do in the next version, together with any further edits you may have. Thanks again Olof From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Olof Nordling Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 4:46 PM To: RT4 WHOIS Subject: [Rt4-whois] Scope and Roadmap of Whois Review Team 20110120 clear .doc Dear all, New "draft final" version attached for your final review. I hope I managed to catch all edits, but please scrutinize. Thanks Olof -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110120/9878206b/attachment.html From denise.michel at icann.org Thu Jan 20 16:42:29 2011 From: denise.michel at icann.org (Denise Michel) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:42:29 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Team questions for ICANN staff Message-ID: Dear Review Team members: Please see attached draft list of questions from the WRT to ICANN staff.?This list needs to be finalized by the WRT and, if possible, prioritized.? Also, please note that several potential questions require clarification. Regards, Denise Denise Michel ICANN Advisor to the President denise.michel at icann.org +1.408.429.3072 mobile +1.310.578.8632 direct -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: DRAFT LIST OF QUESTIONS FOR STAFF FROM THE WHOIS REVIEW TEAM.doc Type: application/msword Size: 56832 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110120/50fc8de6/DRAFTLISTOFQUESTIONSFORSTAFFFROMTHEWHOISREVIEWTEAM.doc From lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com Mon Jan 17 19:01:59 2011 From: lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com (lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:01:59 -0700 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Suggested questions for Lawrence Strickling and Fiona Alexander Message-ID: <20110117120159.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.d025d841b4.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110117/d2432412/attachment.html From alice.jansen at icann.org Fri Jan 21 14:30:41 2011 From: alice.jansen at icann.org (Alice Jansen) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 06:30:41 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Doodle Poll - F2F Meeting - September 2011 Message-ID: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5CF1BF23D@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Dear Review Team Members, As you know, a face-to-face meeting will be held in September 2011 in line with the action plan adopted in London. Please complete the enclosed doodle poll so that we may select the most convenient dates for this session. Kindly note that the meeting will last two full days. http://doodle.com/y7ar5cp7gn2ds5ch We would be very grateful if you could please provide us with your availability by Wednesday, 26 January. Many thanks in advance for your cooperation, Very best regards Alice Alice Jansen --------------------- ICANN Assistant, Organizational Review alice.jansen at icann.org Phone: +32.2.234.78.64 --------------------- 6, Rond Point Schuman B-1040 Brussels, Belgium