From alice.jansen at icann.org Tue Jan 25 12:06:34 2011 From: alice.jansen at icann.org (Alice Jansen) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 04:06:34 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] SV meeting - deadlines - for your information Message-ID: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5CF175001@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Dear Review Team Members, As you may recall, Olof announced the deadline to submit session request forms for the Silicon Valley meeting last week during the London meeting. ICANN staff has set new rules for ICANN meetings that require prompt notice and commitment. For your information, please find below an extensive calendar and list of requirements: * Session request forms need to be handed in by Friday, 4 February. The following are required: o title of the session, o type of the session (open/closed/No web posting); o number of participants; o date, end time and start time; o expected number of attendees (should it be open); o room setup o catering? o Remote participation services (streaming/recording, Adobe room, interpretation, number of mics, bridge, projector etc) o Web posting information (overview of the session - who should attend - agenda). * The final schedule for public sessions will be posted on Monday, 21 February. No further edits and adds to the meeting requests will be accommodated past this date. Note that supporting staff is coordinating with Emily and Kathy to determine the RT's needs. Please feel free to contact me should you have questions or concerns. Thank you, Very best regards Alice Alice E. Jansen -------------------------- ICANN Assistant, Organizational & Affirmation Reviews alice.jansen at icann.org Direct Dial: +32.2.234.78.64 Mobile: +32.4.73.31.76.56 Office Fax: +32.2.234.78.48 Skype: alice_jansen_icann -------------------------- 6, Rond Point Schuman B-1040 Brussels, Belgium -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110125/1f94afb7/attachment.html From kKleiman at pir.org Tue Jan 25 14:37:10 2011 From: kKleiman at pir.org (Kathy Kleiman) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:37:10 -0500 Subject: [Rt4-whois] SV meeting - deadlines - for your information In-Reply-To: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5CF175001@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> References: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5CF175001@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Message-ID: Hi Alice, Hi Olof, Could you kindly work with us to propose a good time for a Public Session at the San Francisco meeting? When did the ATRT team most successfully hold its Public Sessions? When is SSR thinking of holding its? I would think both Monday afternoon and Wednesday would be good times... Tx for the new rules, and the wise guidance, Kathy From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Alice Jansen Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 7:07 AM To: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: [Rt4-whois] SV meeting - deadlines - for your information Dear Review Team Members, As you may recall, Olof announced the deadline to submit session request forms for the Silicon Valley meeting last week during the London meeting. ICANN staff has set new rules for ICANN meetings that require prompt notice and commitment. For your information, please find below an extensive calendar and list of requirements: * Session request forms need to be handed in by Friday, 4 February. The following are required: * title of the session, * type of the session (open/closed/No web posting); * number of participants; * date, end time and start time; * expected number of attendees (should it be open); * room setup * catering? * Remote participation services (streaming/recording, Adobe room, interpretation, number of mics, bridge, projector etc) * Web posting information (overview of the session - who should attend - agenda). * The final schedule for public sessions will be posted on Monday, 21 February. No further edits and adds to the meeting requests will be accommodated past this date. Note that supporting staff is coordinating with Emily and Kathy to determine the RT's needs. Please feel free to contact me should you have questions or concerns. Thank you, Very best regards Alice Alice E. Jansen -------------------------- ICANN Assistant, Organizational & Affirmation Reviews alice.jansen at icann.org Direct Dial: +32.2.234.78.64 Mobile: +32.4.73.31.76.56 Office Fax: +32.2.234.78.48 Skype: alice_jansen_icann -------------------------- 6, Rond Point Schuman B-1040 Brussels, Belgium -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110125/5c8814f8/attachment.html From alice.jansen at icann.org Tue Jan 25 15:13:19 2011 From: alice.jansen at icann.org (Alice Jansen) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 07:13:19 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] SV meeting - deadlines - for your information In-Reply-To: References: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5CF175001@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Message-ID: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5CF17503F@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Hi Kathy, The ATRT used to hold its "interaction with the community" sessions on the Monday afternoon once the ICANN meeting had been officially opened (Welcome Ceremony). Wednesday might be "busier" than Monday for constituencies. Hence we might have greater attendance on the Monday. Kindly note that this is only my opinion and that Emily and you have discretion over that decision. Thanks, Kind regards Alice From: Kathy Kleiman [mailto:kKleiman at pir.org] Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 3:37 PM To: Alice Jansen; rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: RE: [Rt4-whois] SV meeting - deadlines - for your information Hi Alice, Hi Olof, Could you kindly work with us to propose a good time for a Public Session at the San Francisco meeting? When did the ATRT team most successfully hold its Public Sessions? When is SSR thinking of holding its? I would think both Monday afternoon and Wednesday would be good times... Tx for the new rules, and the wise guidance, Kathy From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Alice Jansen Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 7:07 AM To: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: [Rt4-whois] SV meeting - deadlines - for your information Dear Review Team Members, As you may recall, Olof announced the deadline to submit session request forms for the Silicon Valley meeting last week during the London meeting. ICANN staff has set new rules for ICANN meetings that require prompt notice and commitment. For your information, please find below an extensive calendar and list of requirements: * Session request forms need to be handed in by Friday, 4 February. The following are required: * title of the session, * type of the session (open/closed/No web posting); * number of participants; * date, end time and start time; * expected number of attendees (should it be open); * room setup * catering? * Remote participation services (streaming/recording, Adobe room, interpretation, number of mics, bridge, projector etc) * Web posting information (overview of the session - who should attend - agenda). * The final schedule for public sessions will be posted on Monday, 21 February. No further edits and adds to the meeting requests will be accommodated past this date. Note that supporting staff is coordinating with Emily and Kathy to determine the RT's needs. Please feel free to contact me should you have questions or concerns. Thank you, Very best regards Alice Alice E. Jansen -------------------------- ICANN Assistant, Organizational & Affirmation Reviews alice.jansen at icann.org Direct Dial: +32.2.234.78.64 Mobile: +32.4.73.31.76.56 Office Fax: +32.2.234.78.48 Skype: alice_jansen_icann -------------------------- 6, Rond Point Schuman B-1040 Brussels, Belgium -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110125/37fb09b1/attachment.html From emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk Thu Jan 27 08:00:50 2011 From: emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk (Emily Taylor) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:00:50 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Telephone conference schedule Message-ID: <5A56FBC7-46ED-42DE-B2A6-7D77834ECF3E@etlaw.co.uk> Hi all At our London meeting, we agreed an action plan that included a call every two weeks. Because of the geographical spread of Team members, we also agreed to rotate the timing of the calls. Alice has kindly pulled together a schedule, using Bill's work on time zones. I propose that we adopt this schedule. My proposal is that individuals for whom a call falls between 22:00 - 06:00 local time should not be expected to participate in that call. Each call will be recorded, the transcript will be available, and we plan to have regular face to face meetings. If I don't hear any objections, this will be the basis that we adopt the schedule. Kind regards Emily 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110127/61ef9ab4/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: WHOIS - Conference Call calendar.doc Type: application/msword Size: 39424 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110127/61ef9ab4/WHOIS-ConferenceCallcalendar.doc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110127/61ef9ab4/attachment-0001.html From sharonchallis at aol.com Thu Jan 27 08:27:49 2011 From: sharonchallis at aol.com (Sharon Lemon) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:27:49 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Telephone conference schedule In-Reply-To: <5A56FBC7-46ED-42DE-B2A6-7D77834ECF3E@etlaw.co.uk> References: <5A56FBC7-46ED-42DE-B2A6-7D77834ECF3E@etlaw.co.uk> Message-ID: <41A0C6D1-4F39-414B-8DF8-D8460DD9CA6F@aol.com> Emily and Alice, Thx for this. Couple of questions: 1 how long should we allow for each call, now they are more frequent? 2. I note that 22.6 is listed, and my diary shows that as a FTF is Amman- is this no longer the case? 3. 14.9 shown as FTF, I have it the following week. I presume that means that it is close to our FTF? Thx Sharon Sent from my iPad On 27 Jan 2011, at 08:00, Emily Taylor wrote: > Hi all > > At our London meeting, we agreed an action plan that included a call every two weeks. Because of the geographical spread of Team members, we also agreed to rotate the timing of the calls. > > Alice has kindly pulled together a schedule, using Bill's work on time zones. > > I propose that we adopt this schedule. My proposal is that individuals for whom a call falls between 22:00 - 06:00 local time should not be expected to participate in that call. Each call will be recorded, the transcript will be available, and we plan to have regular face to face meetings. > > If I don't hear any objections, this will be the basis that we adopt the schedule. > > Kind regards > > Emily > > > > 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK > telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 > emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk > > > _______________________________________________ > Rt4-whois mailing list > Rt4-whois at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110127/c95a8459/attachment.html From emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk Thu Jan 27 08:35:25 2011 From: emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk (Emily Taylor) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:35:25 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Telephone conference schedule In-Reply-To: <41A0C6D1-4F39-414B-8DF8-D8460DD9CA6F@aol.com> References: <5A56FBC7-46ED-42DE-B2A6-7D77834ECF3E@etlaw.co.uk> <41A0C6D1-4F39-414B-8DF8-D8460DD9CA6F@aol.com> Message-ID: Hi Sharon Good questions, thanks. I propose that we schedule 90 minutes for the calls (to create the necessary diary time), but aim to complete the calls within one hour, unless the agenda demands more time. I think what Alice has done is scheduled a call every two weeks, and the exact dates of the F2F meetings will be slightly different. For example, I believe we agreed to meet all day Sunday in San Francisco, and I suggest that we go for the same date in other ICANN meetings. Alice - please would you confirm, and send through the dates of the Sunday at ICANN meetings this year, and the result of the doodle poll re: our London meeting when that is decided. Kind regards Emily On 27 Jan 2011, at 08:27, Sharon Lemon wrote: > Emily and Alice, > > Thx for this. Couple of questions: > > 1 how long should we allow for each call, now they are more frequent? > 2. I note that 22.6 is listed, and my diary shows that as a FTF is Amman- is this no longer the case? > 3. 14.9 shown as FTF, I have it the following week. I presume that means that it is close to our FTF? > > Thx > > Sharon > > Sent from my iPad > > On 27 Jan 2011, at 08:00, Emily Taylor wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> At our London meeting, we agreed an action plan that included a call every two weeks. Because of the geographical spread of Team members, we also agreed to rotate the timing of the calls. >> >> Alice has kindly pulled together a schedule, using Bill's work on time zones. >> >> I propose that we adopt this schedule. My proposal is that individuals for whom a call falls between 22:00 - 06:00 local time should not be expected to participate in that call. Each call will be recorded, the transcript will be available, and we plan to have regular face to face meetings. >> >> If I don't hear any objections, this will be the basis that we adopt the schedule. >> >> Kind regards >> >> Emily >> >> >> >> 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK >> telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 >> emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Rt4-whois mailing list >> Rt4-whois at icann.org >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110127/9ae88ad5/attachment.html From alice.jansen at icann.org Thu Jan 27 09:07:32 2011 From: alice.jansen at icann.org (Alice Jansen) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 01:07:32 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] visa applications Message-ID: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5CF9FAEA3@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Dear Review Team Members, Should you need a visa to attend the San Francisco meeting, please make sure to read the following webpage: http://svsf40.icann.org/travel Also, please feel free to request a letter of invitation via this webpage should you require one to apply for your visa. Thanks, Kind regards Alice Alice E. Jansen -------------------------- ICANN Assistant, Organizational & Affirmation Reviews alice.jansen at icann.org Direct Dial: +32.2.234.78.64 Mobile: +32.4.73.31.76.56 Office Fax: +32.2.234.78.48 Skype: alice_jansen_icann -------------------------- 6, Rond Point Schuman B-1040 Brussels, Belgium -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110127/44abf366/attachment.html From alice.jansen at icann.org Thu Jan 27 14:41:01 2011 From: alice.jansen at icann.org (Alice Jansen) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 06:41:01 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] FOLLOW-UP: Telephone conference schedule In-Reply-To: References: <5A56FBC7-46ED-42DE-B2A6-7D77834ECF3E@etlaw.co.uk> <41A0C6D1-4F39-414B-8DF8-D8460DD9CA6F@aol.com> Message-ID: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5CF9FAEF0@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Dear Review Team Members, Please find attached an updated version of the calendar for your consideration which includes your F2F sessions. (Also available on the Wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Conference+Call+Schedule+-+Draft) The Doodle poll results indicate that Tuesday, 20 September and Wednesday, 21 September are the best dates for your September meeting. Thanks, Very best regards Alice From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 9:35 AM To: Sharon Lemon Cc: RT4 WHOIS Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Telephone conference schedule Hi Sharon Good questions, thanks. I propose that we schedule 90 minutes for the calls (to create the necessary diary time), but aim to complete the calls within one hour, unless the agenda demands more time. I think what Alice has done is scheduled a call every two weeks, and the exact dates of the F2F meetings will be slightly different. For example, I believe we agreed to meet all day Sunday in San Francisco, and I suggest that we go for the same date in other ICANN meetings. Alice - please would you confirm, and send through the dates of the Sunday at ICANN meetings this year, and the result of the doodle poll re: our London meeting when that is decided. Kind regards Emily On 27 Jan 2011, at 08:27, Sharon Lemon wrote: Emily and Alice, Thx for this. Couple of questions: 1 how long should we allow for each call, now they are more frequent? 2. I note that 22.6 is listed, and my diary shows that as a FTF is Amman- is this no longer the case? 3. 14.9 shown as FTF, I have it the following week. I presume that means that it is close to our FTF? Thx Sharon Sent from my iPad On 27 Jan 2011, at 08:00, Emily Taylor > wrote: Hi all At our London meeting, we agreed an action plan that included a call every two weeks. Because of the geographical spread of Team members, we also agreed to rotate the timing of the calls. Alice has kindly pulled together a schedule, using Bill's work on time zones. I propose that we adopt this schedule. My proposal is that individuals for whom a call falls between 22:00 - 06:00 local time should not be expected to participate in that call. Each call will be recorded, the transcript will be available, and we plan to have regular face to face meetings. If I don't hear any objections, this will be the basis that we adopt the schedule. Kind regards Emily [cid:image001.gif at 01CBBE38.999CFEC0] 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois [cid:image001.gif at 01CBBE38.999CFEC0] 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110127/720559fc/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 5113 bytes Desc: image001.gif Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110127/720559fc/image001.gif -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: WHOIS - Conference Call calendar v2.doc Type: application/msword Size: 40448 bytes Desc: WHOIS - Conference Call calendar v2.doc Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110127/720559fc/WHOIS-ConferenceCallcalendarv2.doc From kKleiman at pir.org Thu Jan 27 17:41:24 2011 From: kKleiman at pir.org (Kathy Kleiman) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:41:24 -0500 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Great thanks for your warm hospitality Message-ID: Dear Sharon, I wanted to add my thanks to everyone's at our meeting. Thank you so much for all of your work in planning our meeting in London. Your extensive planning of location, hotel, lunches, hospitality, pictures - from the largest to smallest details - paved the way for a truly unique and productive first face to face meeting of our group. It is an experience I will never forget. Great thanks also to your wonderful team. It was a great pleasure to meet them and talk with them -- and their warm hospitality was much appreciated! London will always be very special to me henceforth - a place where we had terrific memories, along with good, hard work. Thank you! Kathy Kleiman Director of Policy .ORG, The Public Interest Registry Direct: +1 703-889-5756 | Mobile:+1 703-371-6846| www.pir.org | Find us on Facebook | .ORG Blog | Flickr | YouTube | Twitter | Confidentiality Note: Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry. If received in error, please inform sender and then delete. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110127/f68a6d5a/attachment.html From bill.smith at paypal-inc.com Thu Jan 27 17:58:09 2011 From: bill.smith at paypal-inc.com (Smith, Bill) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:58:09 -0700 Subject: [Rt4-whois] FOLLOW-UP: Telephone conference schedule In-Reply-To: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5CF9FAEF0@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> References: <5A56FBC7-46ED-42DE-B2A6-7D77834ECF3E@etlaw.co.uk> <41A0C6D1-4F39-414B-8DF8-D8460DD9CA6F@aol.com> <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5CF9FAEF0@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Message-ID: <25AE8174-49AB-44A0-93DD-E9E2C7FBC370@paypal.com> I have also updated the Calendar to include the conference calls and face-to-face meetings. Hopefully timezones, access privileges, etc. work for everyone. On Jan 27, 2011, at 6:41 AM, Alice Jansen wrote: Dear Review Team Members, Please find attached an updated version of the calendar for your consideration which includes your F2F sessions. (Also available on the Wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Conference+Call+Schedule+-+Draft) The Doodle poll results indicate that Tuesday, 20 September and Wednesday, 21 September are the best dates for your September meeting. Thanks, Very best regards Alice From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 9:35 AM To: Sharon Lemon Cc: RT4 WHOIS Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Telephone conference schedule Hi Sharon Good questions, thanks. I propose that we schedule 90 minutes for the calls (to create the necessary diary time), but aim to complete the calls within one hour, unless the agenda demands more time. I think what Alice has done is scheduled a call every two weeks, and the exact dates of the F2F meetings will be slightly different. For example, I believe we agreed to meet all day Sunday in San Francisco, and I suggest that we go for the same date in other ICANN meetings. Alice - please would you confirm, and send through the dates of the Sunday at ICANN meetings this year, and the result of the doodle poll re: our London meeting when that is decided. Kind regards Emily On 27 Jan 2011, at 08:27, Sharon Lemon wrote: Emily and Alice, Thx for this. Couple of questions: 1 how long should we allow for each call, now they are more frequent? 2. I note that 22.6 is listed, and my diary shows that as a FTF is Amman- is this no longer the case? 3. 14.9 shown as FTF, I have it the following week. I presume that means that it is close to our FTF? Thx Sharon Sent from my iPad On 27 Jan 2011, at 08:00, Emily Taylor > wrote: Hi all At our London meeting, we agreed an action plan that included a call every two weeks. Because of the geographical spread of Team members, we also agreed to rotate the timing of the calls. Alice has kindly pulled together a schedule, using Bill's work on time zones. I propose that we adopt this schedule. My proposal is that individuals for whom a call falls between 22:00 - 06:00 local time should not be expected to participate in that call. Each call will be recorded, the transcript will be available, and we plan to have regular face to face meetings. If I don't hear any objections, this will be the basis that we adopt the schedule. Kind regards Emily 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk From kKleiman at pir.org Thu Jan 27 18:22:40 2011 From: kKleiman at pir.org (Kathy Kleiman) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:22:40 -0500 Subject: [Rt4-whois] FOLLOW-UP: Telephone conference schedule - unusual times. In-Reply-To: <25AE8174-49AB-44A0-93DD-E9E2C7FBC370@paypal.com> References: <5A56FBC7-46ED-42DE-B2A6-7D77834ECF3E@etlaw.co.uk><41A0C6D1-4F39-414B-8DF8-D8460DD9CA6F@aol.com><05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5CF9FAEF0@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> <25AE8174-49AB-44A0-93DD-E9E2C7FBC370@paypal.com> Message-ID: Tx Bill, I greatly appreciate the update, and it is good to see the dates written out. Question (and forgive me if was already asked), but I thought Bill worked out a set of possible times for the calls that meant that no one was up at a truly odd hour. Is this no longer feasible? Tx, Kathy -----Original Message----- From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Smith, Bill Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 12:58 PM To: Alice Jansen Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] FOLLOW-UP: Telephone conference schedule I have also updated the Calendar to include the conference calls and face-to-face meetings. Hopefully timezones, access privileges, etc. work for everyone. On Jan 27, 2011, at 6:41 AM, Alice Jansen wrote: Dear Review Team Members, Please find attached an updated version of the calendar for your consideration which includes your F2F sessions. (Also available on the Wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Conference+Call+Schedule +-+Draft) The Doodle poll results indicate that Tuesday, 20 September and Wednesday, 21 September are the best dates for your September meeting. Thanks, Very best regards Alice From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 9:35 AM To: Sharon Lemon Cc: RT4 WHOIS Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Telephone conference schedule Hi Sharon Good questions, thanks. I propose that we schedule 90 minutes for the calls (to create the necessary diary time), but aim to complete the calls within one hour, unless the agenda demands more time. I think what Alice has done is scheduled a call every two weeks, and the exact dates of the F2F meetings will be slightly different. For example, I believe we agreed to meet all day Sunday in San Francisco, and I suggest that we go for the same date in other ICANN meetings. Alice - please would you confirm, and send through the dates of the Sunday at ICANN meetings this year, and the result of the doodle poll re: our London meeting when that is decided. Kind regards Emily On 27 Jan 2011, at 08:27, Sharon Lemon wrote: Emily and Alice, Thx for this. Couple of questions: 1 how long should we allow for each call, now they are more frequent? 2. I note that 22.6 is listed, and my diary shows that as a FTF is Amman- is this no longer the case? 3. 14.9 shown as FTF, I have it the following week. I presume that means that it is close to our FTF? Thx Sharon Sent from my iPad On 27 Jan 2011, at 08:00, Emily Taylor > wrote: Hi all At our London meeting, we agreed an action plan that included a call every two weeks. Because of the geographical spread of Team members, we also agreed to rotate the timing of the calls. Alice has kindly pulled together a schedule, using Bill's work on time zones. I propose that we adopt this schedule. My proposal is that individuals for whom a call falls between 22:00 - 06:00 local time should not be expected to participate in that call. Each call will be recorded, the transcript will be available, and we plan to have regular face to face meetings. If I don't hear any objections, this will be the basis that we adopt the schedule. Kind regards Emily 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois From kim at vonarx.ca Fri Jan 28 15:24:22 2011 From: kim at vonarx.ca (Kim G. von Arx) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:24:22 -0500 Subject: [Rt4-whois] FOLLOW-UP: Telephone conference schedule In-Reply-To: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5CF9FAEF0@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> References: <5A56FBC7-46ED-42DE-B2A6-7D77834ECF3E@etlaw.co.uk> <41A0C6D1-4F39-414B-8DF8-D8460DD9CA6F@aol.com> <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5CF9FAEF0@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Message-ID: <85CA9AC0-0063-4414-9314-30058799E381@vonarx.ca> Hi All: I have a quick question with respect to the San Francisco meeting. What date should we arrive and depart? The ICANN meeting if from the 13-18... What time will be our first meeting on the 13 and what time will be our last meeting on the 18? I just need to know whether I have to arrive a day before and leave a day after. Thanks. Kim __________________________________ Happy New Year! May 2011 bring you joy and happiness. On 27 Jan 2011, at 09:41, Alice Jansen wrote: > Dear Review Team Members, > > Please find attached an updated version of the calendar for your consideration which includes your F2F sessions. (Also available on the Wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Conference+Call+Schedule+-+Draft) > > The Doodle poll results indicate that Tuesday, 20 September and Wednesday, 21 September are the best dates for your September meeting. > > Thanks, > > Very best regards > > Alice > > From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor > Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 9:35 AM > To: Sharon Lemon > Cc: RT4 WHOIS > Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Telephone conference schedule > > Hi Sharon > > Good questions, thanks. > > I propose that we schedule 90 minutes for the calls (to create the necessary diary time), but aim to complete the calls within one hour, unless the agenda demands more time. > > I think what Alice has done is scheduled a call every two weeks, and the exact dates of the F2F meetings will be slightly different. For example, I believe we agreed to meet all day Sunday in San Francisco, and I suggest that we go for the same date in other ICANN meetings. > > Alice - please would you confirm, and send through the dates of the Sunday at ICANN meetings this year, and the result of the doodle poll re: our London meeting when that is decided. > > Kind regards > > Emily > > On 27 Jan 2011, at 08:27, Sharon Lemon wrote: > > > Emily and Alice, > > Thx for this. Couple of questions: > > 1 how long should we allow for each call, now they are more frequent? > 2. I note that 22.6 is listed, and my diary shows that as a FTF is Amman- is this no longer the case? > 3. 14.9 shown as FTF, I have it the following week. I presume that means that it is close to our FTF? > > Thx > > Sharon > > Sent from my iPad > > On 27 Jan 2011, at 08:00, Emily Taylor wrote: > > Hi all > > At our London meeting, we agreed an action plan that included a call every two weeks. Because of the geographical spread of Team members, we also agreed to rotate the timing of the calls. > > Alice has kindly pulled together a schedule, using Bill's work on time zones. > > I propose that we adopt this schedule. My proposal is that individuals for whom a call falls between 22:00 - 06:00 local time should not be expected to participate in that call. Each call will be recorded, the transcript will be available, and we plan to have regular face to face meetings. > > If I don't hear any objections, this will be the basis that we adopt the schedule. > > Kind regards > > Emily > > > > 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK > telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 > emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk > > > _______________________________________________ > Rt4-whois mailing list > Rt4-whois at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois > > > 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK > telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 > emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk > > > _______________________________________________ > Rt4-whois mailing list > Rt4-whois at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110128/3cb42d47/attachment.html From kKleiman at pir.org Fri Jan 28 16:13:24 2011 From: kKleiman at pir.org (Kathy Kleiman) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:13:24 -0500 Subject: [Rt4-whois] FOLLOW-UP: Telephone conference schedule In-Reply-To: <85CA9AC0-0063-4414-9314-30058799E381@vonarx.ca> References: <5A56FBC7-46ED-42DE-B2A6-7D77834ECF3E@etlaw.co.uk><41A0C6D1-4F39-414B-8DF8-D8460DD9CA6F@aol.com><05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5CF9FAEF0@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> <85CA9AC0-0063-4414-9314-30058799E381@vonarx.ca> Message-ID: Kim, Sorry, but we won't have these final details until meet on 2/2 (Emily, Kathy, Olof, Alice) to finalize requests for rooms. Even then, we won't know for a little bit whether our public session will be on Mon or Wed. But if you can be in town on Sunday morning through Wednesday night, you will have the whole possible timespan. Best, Kathy From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Kim G. von Arx Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 10:24 AM To: Alice Jansen Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] FOLLOW-UP: Telephone conference schedule Hi All: I have a quick question with respect to the San Francisco meeting. What date should we arrive and depart? The ICANN meeting if from the 13-18... What time will be our first meeting on the 13 and what time will be our last meeting on the 18? I just need to know whether I have to arrive a day before and leave a day after. Thanks. Kim __________________________________ Happy New Year! May 2011 bring you joy and happiness. On 27 Jan 2011, at 09:41, Alice Jansen wrote: Dear Review Team Members, Please find attached an updated version of the calendar for your consideration which includes your F2F sessions. (Also available on the Wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Conference+Call+Schedule +-+Draft ) The Doodle poll results indicate that Tuesday, 20 September and Wednesday, 21 September are the best dates for your September meeting. Thanks, Very best regards Alice From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 9:35 AM To: Sharon Lemon Cc: RT4 WHOIS Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Telephone conference schedule Hi Sharon Good questions, thanks. I propose that we schedule 90 minutes for the calls (to create the necessary diary time), but aim to complete the calls within one hour, unless the agenda demands more time. I think what Alice has done is scheduled a call every two weeks, and the exact dates of the F2F meetings will be slightly different. For example, I believe we agreed to meet all day Sunday in San Francisco, and I suggest that we go for the same date in other ICANN meetings. Alice - please would you confirm, and send through the dates of the Sunday at ICANN meetings this year, and the result of the doodle poll re: our London meeting when that is decided. Kind regards Emily On 27 Jan 2011, at 08:27, Sharon Lemon wrote: Emily and Alice, Thx for this. Couple of questions: 1 how long should we allow for each call, now they are more frequent? 2. I note that 22.6 is listed, and my diary shows that as a FTF is Amman- is this no longer the case? 3. 14.9 shown as FTF, I have it the following week. I presume that means that it is close to our FTF? Thx Sharon Sent from my iPad On 27 Jan 2011, at 08:00, Emily Taylor > wrote: Hi all At our London meeting, we agreed an action plan that included a call every two weeks. Because of the geographical spread of Team members, we also agreed to rotate the timing of the calls. Alice has kindly pulled together a schedule, using Bill's work on time zones. I propose that we adopt this schedule. My proposal is that individuals for whom a call falls between 22:00 - 06:00 local time should not be expected to participate in that call. Each call will be recorded, the transcript will be available, and we plan to have regular face to face meetings. If I don't hear any objections, this will be the basis that we adopt the schedule. Kind regards Emily 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110128/9bb4fe78/attachment.html From lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com Fri Jan 28 18:04:51 2011 From: lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com (lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:04:51 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] FOLLOW-UP: Telephone conference schedule In-Reply-To: References: <5A56FBC7-46ED-42DE-B2A6-7D77834ECF3E@etlaw.co.uk><41A0C6D1-4F39-414B-8DF8-D8460DD9CA6F@aol.com><05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5CF9FAEF0@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org><85CA9AC0-0063-4414-9314-30058799E381@vonarx.ca> Message-ID: <384708770-1296238130-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-281650040-@bda283.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> Thanks! I needed this as well to plan my itinerary. Lynn Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T -----Original Message----- From: "Kathy Kleiman" Sender: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:13:24 To: Kim G. von Arx; Alice Jansen Cc: Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] FOLLOW-UP: Telephone conference schedule _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois From kim at vonarx.ca Fri Jan 28 19:56:39 2011 From: kim at vonarx.ca (Kim G. von Arx) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:56:39 -0500 Subject: [Rt4-whois] FOLLOW-UP: Telephone conference schedule In-Reply-To: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5CF9FAEF0@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> References: <5A56FBC7-46ED-42DE-B2A6-7D77834ECF3E@etlaw.co.uk> <41A0C6D1-4F39-414B-8DF8-D8460DD9CA6F@aol.com> <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5CF9FAEF0@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Message-ID: Dear All: I looked at the schedule and put them all in my calendar and I note that 5 of the calls are going to be in my 22:00 - 06:00 timeframe. I will still try to participate in some of them, but can't promise that I will be able to attend all of them. Further, I will have to excuse my self early on our Feb 2 call. I have a meeting starting at noon that day. Finally, I am wondering whether it would make sense for us to have a final face to face meeting mid to end of November to iron out all of the wrinkles and outstanding issues at that time so that we can all sign off on the final report face to face. Kim __________________________________ Happy New Year! May 2011 bring you joy and happiness. On 27 Jan 2011, at 09:41, Alice Jansen wrote: > Dear Review Team Members, > > Please find attached an updated version of the calendar for your consideration which includes your F2F sessions. (Also available on the Wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Conference+Call+Schedule+-+Draft) > > The Doodle poll results indicate that Tuesday, 20 September and Wednesday, 21 September are the best dates for your September meeting. > > Thanks, > > Very best regards > > Alice > > From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor > Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 9:35 AM > To: Sharon Lemon > Cc: RT4 WHOIS > Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Telephone conference schedule > > Hi Sharon > > Good questions, thanks. > > I propose that we schedule 90 minutes for the calls (to create the necessary diary time), but aim to complete the calls within one hour, unless the agenda demands more time. > > I think what Alice has done is scheduled a call every two weeks, and the exact dates of the F2F meetings will be slightly different. For example, I believe we agreed to meet all day Sunday in San Francisco, and I suggest that we go for the same date in other ICANN meetings. > > Alice - please would you confirm, and send through the dates of the Sunday at ICANN meetings this year, and the result of the doodle poll re: our London meeting when that is decided. > > Kind regards > > Emily > > On 27 Jan 2011, at 08:27, Sharon Lemon wrote: > > > Emily and Alice, > > Thx for this. Couple of questions: > > 1 how long should we allow for each call, now they are more frequent? > 2. I note that 22.6 is listed, and my diary shows that as a FTF is Amman- is this no longer the case? > 3. 14.9 shown as FTF, I have it the following week. I presume that means that it is close to our FTF? > > Thx > > Sharon > > Sent from my iPad > > On 27 Jan 2011, at 08:00, Emily Taylor wrote: > > Hi all > > At our London meeting, we agreed an action plan that included a call every two weeks. Because of the geographical spread of Team members, we also agreed to rotate the timing of the calls. > > Alice has kindly pulled together a schedule, using Bill's work on time zones. > > I propose that we adopt this schedule. My proposal is that individuals for whom a call falls between 22:00 - 06:00 local time should not be expected to participate in that call. Each call will be recorded, the transcript will be available, and we plan to have regular face to face meetings. > > If I don't hear any objections, this will be the basis that we adopt the schedule. > > Kind regards > > Emily > > > > 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK > telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 > emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk > > > _______________________________________________ > Rt4-whois mailing list > Rt4-whois at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois > > > 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK > telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 > emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk > > > _______________________________________________ > Rt4-whois mailing list > Rt4-whois at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110128/c6cc8295/attachment.html From kKleiman at pir.org Sat Jan 29 03:14:07 2011 From: kKleiman at pir.org (Kathy Kleiman) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 22:14:07 -0500 Subject: [Rt4-whois] FW: [IP] Internet Security Savvy is Critical as Egyptian Government Blocks Websites, Arrests Activists in Response to Continued Protest | Electronic Frontier Foundation Message-ID: Dear All, I know we are all watching the stories from the Middle East with interest, and great concern. I remember the issue of privacy/anonymity came up in our London discussions. I thought the following posting to Professor Dave Farber's Interesting People List might be of interest. Best, Kathy From: David Farber [mailto:dave at farber.net] Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 3:50 PM To: ip Subject: [IP] Internet Security Savvy is Critical as Egyptian Government Blocks Websites, Arrests Activists in Response to Continued Protest | Electronic Frontier Foundation http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/01/egypt-blocks-websites-arrests-blogg ers-and Internet Security Savvy is Critical as Egyptian Government Blocks Websites, Arrests Activists in Response to Continued Protest Commentary by Eva Galperin As we've seen in Iran and Tunisia, social networking tools have given activists in authoritarian regimes a powerful voice, which can be heard well beyond their own country. But the use of social networking tools has also given their governments ways to identify and retaliate against them. This week we are watching the same dynamic play out in Egypt. This is why it is critical that all activists -in Egypt and elsewhere-take precautions to protect their anonymity and freedom of expression. The protests in Egypt this week also highlight another important point: authoritarian governments can block access to social media websites, but determined, tech-savvy activists are likely to find ways to circumvent censorship to communicate with the rest of the world. In an attempt to clamp down on Egyptian protesters, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak's government is intermittently blocking websites and arresting bloggers, journalists, and dissidents. Like the Tunisians, Egyptian protesters have made heavy use of social media websites to share information about the protests with the outside world and with each other. In spite of the Egyptian government's blocking of Twitter, tweets from the Egyptian protests in Suez and Cairo provided up-to-the-minute reports about protest activity, the movements of police, deaths and injuries, links to photos on Twitpic, and videos on YouTube. Cooperation amongst protesting citizens has kept communications resilient so far. When protestors in Cario's Tahir Square experienced an outage in cell phone data service, nearby residents reportedly opened their home Wi-Fii networks to allow protesters to get online. On the first day of protests, the Egyptian government blocked several websites, including Twitter and Bambuser , a Swedish website which allows users to stream live video from their cell phones. By the second day, the government's blocking of Twitter was sparse and intermittent, but there were reports of blocking Facebook and YouTube. It is unclear whether or not the Egyptian government will continue to expand its list of blocked sites in the coming days. Even the US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who was conspicuously silent during the protests leading up to the Tunisian revolution, has called on the Mubarak government to respect freedom of expression and urged them "not to...block communications, including on social media sites." The other dangerous aspect of the Mubarak government's shameful campaign of silence and censorship has been the arrest and detention of bloggers, journalists, and activists. The Committee to Protect Journalists has reported that the Egyptian government has shut down at least two independent news websites: Al-Dustour and El-Badil. Police beat Al-Jazeera correspondent Mustafa Kafifi and Guardian reporter Jack Shenker, who posted anaudio recording of the incident. Policemen have attacked and arrested cameramen covering the protests and onlookers recording the protests with cell phones. Egypt is no stranger to the arrest of bloggers. Egyptian blogger Kareem Amer was sentenced to four years in prison for "disparaging religion" and "defaming the president" in 2007. In 2009, web forum founder Karim Al-Bukheiri was arrested, tortured, and subject to constant government surveillance. Just last year, the Islamic Human Rights Foundation reported that Egyptian Security Forces arrested "at least 29 activists, including bloggers, lawyers, and human rights activists." The concern here is clear-if the street protests subside, the Mubarak government could initiate a campaign of retaliation and oppression, arresting and harassing the very bloggers and activists who have been chronicling the protests online. Some countries have gone even further. In Iran two opposition activists were hanged this week for taking pictures and video of the Green Revolution protests and posting them online. Given the potential dangers, it is absolutely critical that Egyptian protesters take precautions when communicating online. To reiterate, social networking tools have given activists a powerful voice, which can be heard well beyond Egypt, but activists should also remember that the Egyptian government could use these same tools to identify and retaliate against them. We recommend that political activists look at our Surveillance Self Defense International report for information on how to use technology defensively to better protect their anonymity and freedom of expression in Egypt and other authoritarian regimes. Archives | Modify Your Subscription | Unsubscribe Now -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110128/cf6bef12/attachment.html From emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk Sat Jan 29 09:53:38 2011 From: emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk (Emily Taylor) Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:53:38 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Call on Wednesday - preparation, and suggested agenda items Message-ID: <35F48913-24BF-411D-A6E0-2FEFCD521F71@etlaw.co.uk> Dear all I'm sure that, like me, you'll be shocked to learn that, next Wednesday, it will be two weeks since our face to face meeting! I'm therefore writing with some suggestions to prepare for our next call. As we decided at our London meeting, the next conference call is taking place this Wednesday at 16:00 UTC. Bearing in mind our action plan, our priority for this call should be to agree definitions and preliminary questions for public comment prior to the San Francisco meeting. It would be useful to have materials circulated in advance of the call, especially from those groups working on definitions (C, D, E, F). In preparation for this meeting, we are hoping each subteam will report on: 1. current status, 2. an outline of what they might propose in our public comment period. 3. questions for ICANN staff (questions based on London Compliance and/or Policy presentations, any ICANN materials posted to the Whois Wiki, or as needed), 4. research and support items the Subteam might need, Alice is ready to help subteams with creating Doodle polls and setting up conference bridges for sub-teams (all calls will be recorded and archived unless otherwise requested). Early next week, we will also be circulating a short report of our meeting for review, approval and publication by the group. As a reminder, here are our Subteams: A. What is the Whois Policy? -- James, Kathy, Wilfried; B. Whois Policy Implementation Review: Peter, Bill, Emily, Michael; C. Law Enforcement: Kim, Sharon, Wilfried and Lutz; D. Consumers and Consumer Trust Sarmad, Olivier, Lynn, Peter, Bill; E. Applicable laws: Kim, Omar, Michael, Lynn; F. Producers and Maintainers of Whois Data: James, Susan, Wilfried (with Omar looking into the related question of who "owns" the data) Is there anything else we should add to the agenda? Kind regards Emily 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110129/d4afc0fe/attachment.html From kim at vonarx.ca Sun Jan 30 20:44:29 2011 From: kim at vonarx.ca (Kim G. von Arx) Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:44:29 -0500 Subject: [Rt4-whois] quick question Message-ID: Hi All: I have a quick question... are our telephone conferences webcast? I thought they are, but I can't find the links, information, etc. to connect. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks. Kim __________________________________ kim at vonarx.ca +1 (613) 286-4445 "Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars..." -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110130/788d8bea/attachment.html