From emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk Mon Mar 7 09:01:16 2011 From: emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk (Emily Taylor) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 09:01:16 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] San Francisco meeting plans - WIPO speaker? In-Reply-To: <20110211130006.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.17c9c11caa.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> References: <20110211130006.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.17c9c11caa.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> Message-ID: Hi Lynn Thanks for this suggestion. I know we were working on having WIPO speak at the next meeting, but given that we have a speaking slot open in the San Francisco agenda, I wonder whether you would be willing to approach WIPO on behalf of the team and see if they can provide a speaker as you suggested. Please let me know your thoughts. Best, Emily On 11 Feb 2011, at 20:00, wrote: > Hi Emily, > Typically WIPO has representatives attending ICANN meetings. > Suggesting that we try to get someone on our agenda to share the use of WHOIS information for the UDRP process. > Perhaps the ICANN staff could assist? > Best regards, > Lynn 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110307/f121b2e8/attachment.html From olof.nordling at icann.org Mon Mar 7 09:12:26 2011 From: olof.nordling at icann.org (Olof Nordling) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 01:12:26 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] San Francisco meeting plans - WIPO speaker? In-Reply-To: References: <20110211130006.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.17c9c11caa.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> Message-ID: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5D350F7CD@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Hello Emily and Lynn, As you may recall, I sent a mail to Erik Wilbers about this some time ago - happy to pursue that... All the best Olof From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 10:01 AM To: Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] San Francisco meeting plans - WIPO speaker? Hi Lynn Thanks for this suggestion. I know we were working on having WIPO speak at the next meeting, but given that we have a speaking slot open in the San Francisco agenda, I wonder whether you would be willing to approach WIPO on behalf of the team and see if they can provide a speaker as you suggested. Please let me know your thoughts. Best, Emily On 11 Feb 2011, at 20:00, > > wrote: Hi Emily, Typically WIPO has representatives attending ICANN meetings. Suggesting that we try to get someone on our agenda to share the use of WHOIS information for the UDRP process. Perhaps the ICANN staff could assist? Best regards, Lynn [http://www.etlaw.co.uk/images/stories/etlaw/logo310.gif] 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110307/11070cbd/attachment.html From emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk Mon Mar 7 09:22:58 2011 From: emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk (Emily Taylor) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 09:22:58 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Formal request for agenda space, SF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear Gabi Thank you for this message. You now have the copy of the public comment. A summary of our presentation would be: The WHOIS Review Team has been set up under the Affirmation of Commitments to "assess the extent to which WHOIS policy is effective and its implementation meets the legitimate needs of law enforcement and promotes consumer trust". The Review Team has drafted a scope of work, roadmap, outreach plan, action plan and has done some early work on defining key terms. A call for public comment was launched on 4 March and a public session has been scheduled for Wednesday 16 March 2011 at 11am-12 noon in the Elizabethan A-C meeting room. The presentation will give an overview of the Team's work to date, issues arising from the public comment, and explore ways in which the ccNSO may be able to contribute to the Review Team's work, for example through the sharing of experiences and good practices relating to ccTLD WHOIS services. Thanks, Emily >> On 4 Mar 2011, at 12:39, Gabriella Schittek wrote: >> >>> Hi Emily, >>> >>> Just to remind you that I need a short summary of your presentation. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Gabi >>> >>> ------ Forwarded Message >>> From: Gabriella Schittek > >>> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 07:00:29 -0800 >>> To: Emily Taylor > >>> Subject: Re: Formal request for agenda space, SF >>> >>> Emily, >>> >>> I would need a short summary of your presentation (2-3 lines would do!) ? we are posting summaries of all presentations prior to the meeting, so that people can prepare (see http://www.ccnso.icann.org/meetings/sanfrancisco/presentations.htm). >>> >>> Also, is there any document that we could post on our agenda page which is relevant for the subject? >>> >>> It would be great if I could have this as soon as possible. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Gabi >>> >>> >>> On 2/22/11 3:42 PM, "Alice Jansen" > wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Gabi, >>>> >>>> Thanks a million ? I have added you to our schedule https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Silicon+Valley+Meeting. >>>> >>>> Emily, Kathy, - my assumption is that this works for you. If not, please let me know. >>>> >>>> Very best regards >>>> >>>> Alice >>>> >>>> From: Gabriella Schittek > >>>> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 06:21:19 -0800 >>>> To: Alice Jansen >, Emily Taylor > >>>> Cc: Kathy Kleiman > >>>> Subject: Re: Formal request for agenda space, SF >>>> >>>> Hello Emily & Alice, >>>> >>>> The only possibility to change the session was to schedule it at 12.40 ? 13.00. I hope this is more suitable. The only risk is that the prior session might overrun! >>>> >>>> Gabi >>>> >>>> On 2/22/11 11:22 AM, "Alice Jansen" > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Gabi, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for trying to squeeze us in your schedule ? hopefully it will work out :-). >>>>> Emily is on vacation this week, which means very limited access to emails. Please do not hesitate to contact me, ccing Kathy ? our Vice-Chair ?, if you have questions. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks so much! >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards >>>>> >>>>> Alice >>>>> >>>>> From: Gabriella Schittek > >>>>> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 07:39:12 -0800 >>>>> To: Emily Taylor > >>>>> Cc: Kathy Kleiman >, Alice Jansen > >>>>> Subject: Re: Formal request for agenda space, SF >>>>> >>>>> Hello Emily, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for pointing this out - I?ll see what I can do about this! I?ll let you know! >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards, >>>>> >>>>> Gabi >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2/19/11 11:52 AM, "Emily Taylor" > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Gabi >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you very much for squeezing us in. Is there a possibility that we could have our 20 minute slot at any other time? Because as luck would have it, that slot exactly coincides with our "Community Interaction". >>>>>> >>>>>> https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Silicon+Valley+Meeting >>>>>> >>>>>> Many thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Emily >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 18 Feb 2011, at 08:01, Gabriella Schittek wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello Emily, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The ccNSO draft agenda has now been published http://ccnso.icann.org/meetings/sanfrancisco/agenda.htm. I could squeeze you in, but only for 20 minutes, Wednesday 16 March, 11.00 ? 11.20. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I hope this is OK. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gabi >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2/9/11 7:02 PM, "Emily Taylor"

> > wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks Chris, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Much appreciated. Isn't it 5 am your time? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> E >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 9 Feb 2011, at 17:56, Chris Disspain wrote: >>>>>>>> > Thanks Emily. > > We are working on fitting you into the agenda. > > Cheers, > > Chris Disspain | Chief Executive Officer > .au Domain Administration Ltd > T: 1300 732 929 | F: 03 8341 4112 > E: ceo at auda.org.au

> | W:www.auda.org.au > > > auDA - The Australian Domain Name Administrator > > > Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email. > > From: Emily Taylor [mailto:emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk] > Sent: Thursday, 10 February 2011 04:50 > To: Chris Disspain > Cc: Gabriella Schittek > Subject: Formal request for agenda space, SF > > Dear Chris and Gabi, > > I have pleasure in sending a formal request on behalf of the WHOIS Review Team, as Chair and ccNSO representative, for some time on the ccNSO meeting agenda. I understand that your agenda planning process is already far advanced, but would be most grateful if you could find us a few minutes. > > As you may know, the WHOIS Policy Review Team mandated by the Affirmation of Commitments began its enterprise in October 2010. The scope of work and roadmap of the WHOIS RT as well as its activities may be found on the community wiki at https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/WHOIS+Policy+Review+Team. > The Team partially composed of SO/AC representatives will hold a second public face-to-face meeting in San Francisco on Sunday, 13 March and invite the ICANN community to interact with them on Wednesday, 16 March starting at 11:00 AM ending at noon. > In addition to this schedule, the RT Members unanimously expressed the wish to meet with ICANN's respective SO/ACs not only to discuss the task they have entrusted with but also to collect input from constituents. As your feedback and comments are essential in this exercise, it would be a great honor if the WHOIS Policy Review Team could please join your session in San Francisco to exchange views. Please advise whether you would be willing to dedicate an agenda item to the WHOIS Policy RT. > > Many thanks in advance for your guidance, > > Best regards, > > > Emily Taylor > Chair, > WHOIS Review Team > > 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK > telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 > emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk

> www.etlaw.co.uk > > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5857 (20110208) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK >>>>>>>> telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 >>>>>>>> emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk

> www.etlaw.co.uk > > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK >>>>>> telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 >>>>>> emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> ------ End of Forwarded Message >> >> >> >> 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK >> telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 >> emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk >> >> >> 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110307/9b646576/attachment.html From emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk Mon Mar 7 09:25:49 2011 From: emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk (Emily Taylor) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 09:25:49 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] WHOIS Review Team - call for public comment Message-ID: Hi Heather I hope you are well. In anticipation of the ICANN meeting, I wanted to inform GAC members that the WHOIS Review Team has launched a call for public comment http://icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-04mar11-en.htm. The comment period is open for a period of 45 days, and includes the period of the ICANN meeting. I hope that GAC members will actively contribute their comments and thoughts to this process. Kind regards Emily Taylor Chair, WHOIS Review Team 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110307/e5e47ba0/attachment.html From emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk Mon Mar 7 09:33:23 2011 From: emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk (Emily Taylor) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 09:33:23 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] WHOIS Review Team, call for public comment Message-ID: <87259B6A-F91A-4681-B410-F48981B902A4@etlaw.co.uk> Hi Patrik The WHOIS review team is looking forward to our session with SSAC on Tuesday 15 March at 9.30 am in Tower Salon A. I wanted to make members of the SSAC aware that we have launched a call for public comment http://icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-04mar11-en.htm, which will be open for 45 days, and will be holding a public meeting on 16 March at 11am in Elizabethan A-C. I hope that the call for public comment will give members of the SSAC a feel for how we are approaching our task, and provide a structure for our conversation with you on 15 March. I hope that you will encourage your members to contribute to the call for public comments, as the process will benefit from a range of perspectives from stakeholders. We are looking forward to our interaction with SSAC at ICANN San Francisco and over the coming months. Kind regards Emily Taylor Chair, WHOIS Review Team 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110307/605b0e43/attachment.html From emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk Mon Mar 7 09:38:20 2011 From: emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk (Emily Taylor) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 09:38:20 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Announcement of Public comment Message-ID: Hi Alice As you will see, I have written to the GAC, SSAC and ccNSO to inform them of our public comment. Heather had asked me to keep her informed (although I don't think we've been able to set up a session with the GAC this time, correct?), and we're meeting with SSAC and ccNSO. Please would you let me know who I should write to for the Registrars and Registries. Please would you also, on the team's behalf, write to the chairs of other ICANN constituencies, to draw their attention to the public comment and our public meeting, and encourage their members to contribute. Kind regards Emily 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110307/86a2791e/attachment.html From gabriella.schittek at icann.org Mon Mar 7 11:12:45 2011 From: gabriella.schittek at icann.org (Gabriella Schittek) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 03:12:45 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Formal request for agenda space, SF In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Hello Emily, Many thanks ? this summary will be posted at http://www.ccnso.icann.org/meetings/sanfrancisco/presentations.htm later today. Could I also just confirm who the speaker(s) will be? Is it only you? Thanks! Gabi On 3/7/11 10:22 AM, "Emily Taylor" wrote: Dear Gabi Thank you for this message. You now have the copy of the public comment. A summary of our presentation would be: The WHOIS Review Team has been set up under the Affirmation of Commitments to "assess the extent to which WHOIS policy is effective and its implementation meets the legitimate needs of law enforcement and promotes consumer trust". The Review Team has drafted a scope of work, roadmap, outreach plan, action plan and has done some early work on defining key terms. A call for public comment was launched on 4 March and a public session has been scheduled for Wednesday 16 March 2011 at 11am-12 noon in the Elizabethan A-C meeting room. The presentation will give an overview of the Team's work to date, issues arising from the public comment, and explore ways in which the ccNSO may be able to contribute to the Review Team's work, for example through the sharing of experiences and good practices relating to ccTLD WHOIS services. Thanks, Emily On 4 Mar 2011, at 12:39, Gabriella Schittek wrote: Hi Emily, Just to remind you that I need a short summary of your presentation. Thanks! Gabi ------ Forwarded Message From: Gabriella Schittek

> > Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 07:00:29 -0800 To: Emily Taylor

> > Subject: Re: Formal request for agenda space, SF Emily, I would need a short summary of your presentation (2-3 lines would do!) ? we are posting summaries of all presentations prior to the meeting, so that people can prepare (see http://www.ccnso.icann.org/meetings/sanfrancisco/presentations.htm). Also, is there any document that we could post on our agenda page which is relevant for the subject? It would be great if I could have this as soon as possible. Thanks! Gabi On 2/22/11 3:42 PM, "Alice Jansen"

> > wrote: Hi Gabi, Thanks a million ? I have added you to our schedule https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Silicon+Valley+Meeting. Emily, Kathy, - my assumption is that this works for you. If not, please let me know. Very best regards Alice From: Gabriella Schittek

> > Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 06:21:19 -0800 To: Alice Jansen

> >, Emily Taylor

> > Cc: Kathy Kleiman

> > Subject: Re: Formal request for agenda space, SF Hello Emily & Alice, The only possibility to change the session was to schedule it at 12.40 ? 13.00. I hope this is more suitable. The only risk is that the prior session might overrun! Gabi On 2/22/11 11:22 AM, "Alice Jansen"

> > wrote: Hi Gabi, Thanks for trying to squeeze us in your schedule ? hopefully it will work out :-). Emily is on vacation this week, which means very limited access to emails. Please do not hesitate to contact me, ccing Kathy ? our Vice-Chair ?, if you have questions. Thanks so much! Kind regards Alice From: Gabriella Schittek

> > Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 07:39:12 -0800 To: Emily Taylor

> > Cc: Kathy Kleiman

> >, Alice Jansen

> > Subject: Re: Formal request for agenda space, SF Hello Emily, Thanks for pointing this out - I?ll see what I can do about this! I?ll let you know! Kind regards, Gabi On 2/19/11 11:52 AM, "Emily Taylor"

> > wrote: Hi Gabi Thank you very much for squeezing us in. Is there a possibility that we could have our 20 minute slot at any other time? Because as luck would have it, that slot exactly coincides with our "Community Interaction". https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Silicon+Valley+Meeting Many thanks, Emily On 18 Feb 2011, at 08:01, Gabriella Schittek wrote: Hello Emily, The ccNSO draft agenda has now been published http://ccnso.icann.org/meetings/sanfrancisco/agenda.htm. I could squeeze you in, but only for 20 minutes, Wednesday 16 March, 11.00 ? 11.20. I hope this is OK. Gabi On 2/9/11 7:02 PM, "Emily Taylor"

> > > wrote: Thanks Chris, Much appreciated. Isn't it 5 am your time? E On 9 Feb 2011, at 17:56, Chris Disspain wrote: Thanks Emily. We are working on fitting you into the agenda. Cheers, Chris Disspain | Chief Executive Officer .au Domain Administration Ltd T: 1300 732 929 | F: 03 8341 4112 E: ceo at auda.org.au

> > | W:www.auda.org.au > > auDA - The Australian Domain Name Administrator Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: Emily Taylor [mailto:emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, 10 February 2011 04:50 To: Chris Disspain Cc: Gabriella Schittek Subject: Formal request for agenda space, SF Dear Chris and Gabi, I have pleasure in sending a formal request on behalf of the WHOIS Review Team, as Chair and ccNSO representative, for some time on the ccNSO meeting agenda. I understand that your agenda planning process is already far advanced, but would be most grateful if you could find us a few minutes. As you may know, the WHOIS Policy Review Team mandated by the Affirmation of Commitments began its enterprise in October 2010. The scope of work and roadmap of the WHOIS RT as well as its activities may be found on the community wiki at https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/WHOIS+Policy+Review+Team. The Team partially composed of SO/AC representatives will hold a second public face-to-face meeting in San Francisco on Sunday, 13 March and invite the ICANN community to interact with them on Wednesday, 16 March starting at 11:00 AM ending at noon. In addition to this schedule, the RT Members unanimously expressed the wish to meet with ICANN's respective SO/ACs not only to discuss the task they have entrusted with but also to collect input from constituents. As your feedback and comments are essential in this exercise, it would be a great honor if the WHOIS Policy Review Team could please join your session in San Francisco to exchange views. Please advise whether you would be willing to dedicate an agenda item to the WHOIS Policy RT. Many thanks in advance for your guidance, Best regards, Emily Taylor Chair, WHOIS Review Team 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk

> > www.etlaw.co.uk > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5857 (20110208) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk

> > www.etlaw.co.uk > > > 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk

> www.etlaw.co.uk > > ------ End of Forwarded Message 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk > 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110307/7bea41e3/attachment.html From alice.jansen at icann.org Mon Mar 7 12:38:54 2011 From: alice.jansen at icann.org (Alice Jansen) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 04:38:54 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Announcement of Public comment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Hi Emily, This is to confirm that emails have been sent to the Chairs of other ICANN constituencies on your behalf. Contact details of the Registries and Registrars were also sent to you in a separate email. Our Silicon Valley meeting schedule is available on the wiki at https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Silicon+Valley+Meeting. Note that I will also circulate outlook invitations to Members for their convenience. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have questions. Thanks, Very best regards Alice From: Emily Taylor > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 01:38:20 -0800 To: Alice Jansen > Cc: "rt4-whois at icann.org WHOIS" > Subject: Announcement of Public comment Hi Alice As you will see, I have written to the GAC, SSAC and ccNSO to inform them of our public comment. Heather had asked me to keep her informed (although I don't think we've been able to set up a session with the GAC this time, correct?), and we're meeting with SSAC and ccNSO. Please would you let me know who I should write to for the Registrars and Registries. Please would you also, on the team's behalf, write to the chairs of other ICANN constituencies, to draw their attention to the public comment and our public meeting, and encourage their members to contribute. Kind regards Emily [http://www.etlaw.co.uk/images/stories/etlaw/logo310.gif] 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110307/942f4282/attachment.html From patrik at frobbit.se Mon Mar 7 13:10:26 2011 From: patrik at frobbit.se (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Patrik_F=E4ltstr=F6m?=) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 14:10:26 +0100 Subject: [Rt4-whois] WHOIS Review Team, call for public comment In-Reply-To: <87259B6A-F91A-4681-B410-F48981B902A4@etlaw.co.uk> References: <87259B6A-F91A-4681-B410-F48981B902A4@etlaw.co.uk> Message-ID: <2F2CA4D7-8783-440C-BBCE-9088C6D4D4DE@frobbit.se> On 7 mar 2011, at 10.33, Emily Taylor wrote: > The WHOIS review team is looking forward to our session with SSAC on Tuesday 15 March at 9.30 am in Tower Salon A. I wanted to make members of the SSAC aware that we have launched a call for public comment http://icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-04mar11-en.htm, which will be open for 45 days, and will be holding a public meeting on 16 March at 11am in Elizabethan A-C. Hi Emily, Thanks for letting me know. > I hope that the call for public comment will give members of the SSAC a feel for how we are approaching our task, and provide a structure for our conversation with you on 15 March. Agree. > I hope that you will encourage your members to contribute to the call for public comments, as the process will benefit from a range of perspectives from stakeholders. We are looking forward to our interaction with SSAC at ICANN San Francisco and over the coming months. I will do the best I can. There is a good interest in whois in SSAC, so I would be surprised if noone will engage here. Patrik From lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com Mon Mar 7 13:28:29 2011 From: lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com (lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 13:28:29 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] San Francisco meeting plans - WIPO speaker? In-Reply-To: References: <20110211130006.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.17c9c11caa.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> Message-ID: <1693688430-1299504794-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-762631261-@bda297.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> I have contacted Doug Isenberg. Unfortunately he will not be at San Francisco. However, Olaf mentioned that he could help with this and WIPO usually has several people at each meeting. Kind regards, Lynn Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T -----Original Message----- From: Emily Taylor Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 09:01:16 To: Cc: Subject: Re: San Francisco meeting plans - WIPO speaker? Hi Lynn Thanks for this suggestion. I know we were working on having WIPO speak at the next meeting, but given that we have a speaking slot open in the San Francisco agenda, I wonder whether you would be willing to approach WIPO on behalf of the team and see if they can provide a speaker as you suggested. Please let me know your thoughts. Best, Emily On 11 Feb 2011, at 20:00, wrote: > Hi Emily, > Typically WIPO has representatives attending ICANN meetings. > Suggesting that we try to get someone on our agenda to share the use of WHOIS information for the UDRP process. > Perhaps the ICANN staff could assist? > Best regards, > Lynn 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110307/9fb8cf04/attachment.html From emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk Mon Mar 7 13:41:42 2011 From: emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk (Emily Taylor) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 13:41:42 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] San Francisco meeting plans - WIPO speaker? In-Reply-To: <1693688430-1299504794-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-762631261-@bda297.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> References: <20110211130006.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.17c9c11caa.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> <1693688430-1299504794-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-762631261-@bda297.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> Message-ID: <6A87BDA7-7861-4137-AB77-DAB4BE1CB410@etlaw.co.uk> Thanks Lynn Yes, indeed, Olof kindly renewed that offer this morning. So, Olof, please do follow up as you suggested. Kind regards Emily On 7 Mar 2011, at 13:28, lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com wrote: > I have contacted Doug Isenberg. Unfortunately he will not be at San Francisco. However, Olaf mentioned that he could help with this and WIPO usually has several people at each meeting. > Kind regards, > Lynn > Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T > > From: Emily Taylor > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 09:01:16 +0000 > To: > Cc: > Subject: Re: San Francisco meeting plans - WIPO speaker? > > Hi Lynn > > Thanks for this suggestion. I know we were working on having WIPO speak at the next meeting, but given that we have a speaking slot open in the San Francisco agenda, I wonder whether you would be willing to approach WIPO on behalf of the team and see if they can provide a speaker as you suggested. > > Please let me know your thoughts. > > Best, > > Emily > > On 11 Feb 2011, at 20:00, wrote: > >> Hi Emily, >> Typically WIPO has representatives attending ICANN meetings. >> Suggesting that we try to get someone on our agenda to share the use of WHOIS information for the UDRP process. >> Perhaps the ICANN staff could assist? >> Best regards, >> Lynn > > > 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK > telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 > emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk > > 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110307/d68a991a/attachment.html From olof.nordling at icann.org Mon Mar 7 13:43:38 2011 From: olof.nordling at icann.org (Olof Nordling) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 05:43:38 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] San Francisco meeting plans - WIPO speaker? In-Reply-To: <6A87BDA7-7861-4137-AB77-DAB4BE1CB410@etlaw.co.uk> References: <20110211130006.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.17c9c11caa.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> <1693688430-1299504794-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-762631261-@bda297.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> <6A87BDA7-7861-4137-AB77-DAB4BE1CB410@etlaw.co.uk> Message-ID: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5D350F7F5@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Emily, Lynn, Yes, I've already reminded Erik about it. Will call as well, for good measure. All the best Olof From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 2:42 PM To: lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] San Francisco meeting plans - WIPO speaker? Thanks Lynn Yes, indeed, Olof kindly renewed that offer this morning. So, Olof, please do follow up as you suggested. Kind regards Emily On 7 Mar 2011, at 13:28, lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com wrote: I have contacted Doug Isenberg. Unfortunately he will not be at San Francisco. However, Olaf mentioned that he could help with this and WIPO usually has several people at each meeting. Kind regards, Lynn Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T ________________________________ From: Emily Taylor > Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 09:01:16 +0000 To: > Cc: > Subject: Re: San Francisco meeting plans - WIPO speaker? Hi Lynn Thanks for this suggestion. I know we were working on having WIPO speak at the next meeting, but given that we have a speaking slot open in the San Francisco agenda, I wonder whether you would be willing to approach WIPO on behalf of the team and see if they can provide a speaker as you suggested. Please let me know your thoughts. Best, Emily On 11 Feb 2011, at 20:00, > > wrote: Hi Emily, Typically WIPO has representatives attending ICANN meetings. Suggesting that we try to get someone on our agenda to share the use of WHOIS information for the UDRP process. Perhaps the ICANN staff could assist? Best regards, Lynn [http://www.etlaw.co.uk/images/stories/etlaw/logo310.gif] 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk [http://www.etlaw.co.uk/images/stories/etlaw/logo310.gif] 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110307/ca9f68a7/attachment.html From alice.jansen at icann.org Mon Mar 7 15:31:33 2011 From: alice.jansen at icann.org (Alice Jansen) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 07:31:33 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] draft ppt for your consideration Message-ID: Hi Emily, Hi Kathy, I have drafted the attached powerpoint for your consideration. Please provide your editing requirements. As the wording and structure of definitions are crucial to fully comprehend the RT's reasoning, I have chosen not to "trim" the statements so as avoid potential misinterpretations. Looking forward to your feedback, Thanks, Best regards Alice -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110307/7994c2ee/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Interaction with the Community - WHOIS.ppt Type: application/x-mspowerpoint Size: 7708672 bytes Desc: Interaction with the Community - WHOIS.ppt Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110307/7994c2ee/InteractionwiththeCommunity-WHOIS.ppt From kim at vonarx.ca Mon Mar 7 16:06:09 2011 From: kim at vonarx.ca (Kim G. von Arx) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 11:06:09 -0500 Subject: [Rt4-whois] draft ppt for your consideration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3AEC1296-B9D6-4BEB-88EB-EF653D889E75@vonarx.ca> Great work, Alice. thanks. Kim __________________________________ kim at vonarx.ca +1 (613) 286-4445 "Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars..." On 7 Mar 2011, at 10:31, Alice Jansen wrote: > Hi Emily, > Hi Kathy, > > I have drafted the attached powerpoint for your consideration. Please provide your editing requirements. > > As the wording and structure of definitions are crucial to fully comprehend the RT's reasoning, I have chosen not to "trim" the statements so as avoid potential misinterpretations. > > Looking forward to your feedback, > > Thanks, > > Best regards > > Alice > > > _______________________________________________ > Rt4-whois mailing list > Rt4-whois at icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110307/3bea036d/attachment.html From emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk Mon Mar 7 17:57:52 2011 From: emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk (Emily Taylor) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 17:57:52 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] WHOIS Policy Review Team - public comment Message-ID: Dear David In anticipation of the ICANN meeting, I would like to inform you on behalf of the WHOIS policy Review Team that the WHOIS Review Team has launched a call for public comment http://icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-04mar11-en.htm. The comment period is open for a period of 45 days and includes the period of the ICANN meeting. In addition to the public comment process, the WHOIS Policy Review Team will also hold an interaction with the community session on Wednesday, 16 March at 11:00 AM in the Elizabethan A-C room. The WHOIS Policy Review Team hopes your constituency will actively submit comments and thoughts to this process as their feedback will be most helpful in the completion of their exercise. I hope you are well, and am looking forward to seeing you again next week, during our scheduled meeting with the Registries constituency at 14:30 on Tuesday March 15. Kind regards Emily 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110307/7f6cab7e/attachment.html From emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk Mon Mar 7 18:01:08 2011 From: emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk (Emily Taylor) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 18:01:08 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] WHOIS Review Team, announcement of call for public comment Message-ID: <6ACE1B24-F95D-4406-B0E3-71801E237575@etlaw.co.uk> Dear Mason In anticipation of the ICANN meeting, I would like to inform you on behalf of the WHOIS policy Review Team that the WHOIS Review Team has launched a call for public comment http://icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-04mar11-en.htm. The comment period is open for a period of 45 days and includes the period of the ICANN meeting. In addition to the public comment process, the WHOIS Policy Review Team will also hold an interaction with the community session on Wednesday, 16 March at 11:00 AM in the Elizabethan A-C room. The WHOIS Policy Review Team hopes that the Registrar constituency will actively submit comments and thoughts to this process as their feedback will be most helpful in the completion of our exercise. I hope you are well, and am looking forward to seeing you again next week, during our scheduled meeting with the Registrars constituency at 10:00 on Tuesday March 15. Kind regards Emily Taylor Chair, WHOIS Review Team 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110307/7ffb18d8/attachment.html From olof.nordling at icann.org Mon Mar 7 20:13:14 2011 From: olof.nordling at icann.org (Olof Nordling) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 12:13:14 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] FW: WIPO attendance at ICANN meeting in SFO? Message-ID: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7E5D396EB83@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> Emily, Lynn, all, I received the below reply from Erik Wilbers/WIPO, for your information. In a subsequent dialogue he made clear that this is the input they can provide to you for the SFO meeting - or otherwise expressed: no opportunities for an in person presentation this time. All the best Olof From: Wilbers, Erik [mailto:Erik.Wilbers at wipo.int] Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 7:53 PM To: Olof Nordling Cc: Alice Jansen; Roache-Turner, David; Beckham, Brian Subject: WIPO attendance at ICANN meeting in SFO? Dear Olof, Thank you for your query, which reaches us not only amidst record case filings but also in times of sudden acceleration of various ICANN rights protection mechanism determinations in the lead-up to its San Francisco meeting later this week. As UDRP initiator and provider, and generally from an intellectual property point of view, the WIPO Center believes that the WhoIs is a very important theme. Without mentioning other possible avenues for enforcement, the WhoIs is the foundation for fair, accurate and predictable proceedings and the reliability of information contained therein is key. Working within the present WhoIs constraints, the WIPO Center has developed elaborate procedures (based on public WhoIs data and registrar verification replies to specific provider questions) to enable UDRP users and panels to have access to the appropriate information for informed pleadings and decisions. With privacy and proxy services in use in an estimated (by ICANN) 25% of registrations overall, and (based on observed WIPO figures) approximately 20% of UDRP cases filed with WIPO (which has processed 20,000 UDRP cases to date), the need for all UDRP stakeholders for some certainty on the issues is real and pressing. We feel it should not be for WIPO, its panels, parties and UDRP stakeholders generally to continue to find interim solutions for a matter that is or should be addressed in ICANN's own Registrar Accreditation Agreement as a basis for compliance and enforcement at the level of the Registration Agreement. In addition to devising a responsible UDRP WhoIs mechanism, WIPO has made serious contributions to a number of ICANN processes with a view to improving the timely verification of UDRP party names and contact information for UDRP notification and communication purposes. This includes in particular requested input made to (and presentations at previously-convened ICANN meetings concerning) ICANN's envisaged Registrar Best Practices Guidelines over the past two years, which we understand is still a project under ICANN consideration. As ICANN knows, we see a need for a uniform standard/mechanism for registrant "disclosure" in the WhoIs in cases involving privacy and proxy registration services. While acknowledging that some positive initial steps have been taken, we think that if ICANN is serious about tackling the myriad challenges implicit in the use of privacy and proxy registration services, it needs to do so both through encouraging uniform registrar and privacy service disclosure practice, as well as at the level of the WhoIs itself. This could also come to involve registries, in the thicker WhoIs model being considered. Moving responsibility for the thicker WhoIs data to a higher level could also make implementing any uniform approach on privacy and proxies that much more workable. Such uniformity is likely to become even more desirable following any New gTLD launch, as the number of registries and registrars are both likely to exponentially increase. Please feel free to take our previous contributions and this reply as the WIPO Center's contribution to the presently planned further discussion. Where good-faith submissions translate into concrete results, we would be pleased to make further contributions at that point. In the interim, it always a pleasure to see you. With best wishes, Erik Wilbers Director WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ________________________________ From: Olof Nordling [mailto:olof.nordling at icann.org] Sent: lundi, 14. f?vrier 2011 13:44 To: Wilbers, Erik Cc: Alice Jansen Subject: WIPO attendance at ICANN meeting in SFO? Dear Erik, Will you and/or any of your colleagues from WIPO come to the ICANN meeting in San Francisco in March? As you may know, the Reviews according to ICANN's Affirmation of Commitments are ongoing and the WHOIS Review Team will have a sequence of meetings in SFO. That team would appreciate an opportunity to meet with WIPO to discuss your experience of WHOIS in conjunction with UDRP cases. Does that sound like something doable for you or your colleagues? I hope it is - and I'm looking forward to seeing you in San Francisco! Very best regards Olof ------------------- Olof Nordling Director, Services Relations Branch Manager, ICANN Brussels office ICANN 6 Rond Point Schuman, Bt.5 B-1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel.: +32.2.234 7872 Mobile: +32.475.420805 Fax: +32.2.234 7848 E-mail: olof.nordling at icann.org www.icann.org World Intellectual Property Organization Disclaimer: This electronic message may contain privileged, confidential and copyright protected information. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail and all its attachments. Please ensure all e-mail attachments are scanned for viruses prior to opening or using. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110307/83c579dd/attachment.html From dmaher at pir.org Mon Mar 7 20:09:24 2011 From: dmaher at pir.org (David W. Maher) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:09:24 -0500 Subject: [Rt4-whois] WHOIS Policy Review Team - public comment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3371CBBD15D9714482943AD5D5B752760586FFF0B8@pir-mail-01> Thanks, Emily. The Registries Stakeholder Group is aware of the call for comment and the community session, and I am sure there will be active participation. I hope you too are well, and we'll see you in San Francisco Best regards David David W. Maher Senior Vice President - Law & Policy Public Interest Registry +1 312 375 4849 ________________________________ From: Emily Taylor [emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk] Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 11:57 AM To: David W. Maher Cc: cherstubbs at aol.com; rt4-whois at icann.org WHOIS Subject: WHOIS Policy Review Team - public comment Dear David In anticipation of the ICANN meeting, I would like to inform you on behalf of the WHOIS policy Review Team that the WHOIS Review Team has launched a call for public comment http://icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-04mar11-en.htm. The comment period is open for a period of 45 days and includes the period of the ICANN meeting. In addition to the public comment process, the WHOIS Policy Review Team will also hold an interaction with the community session on Wednesday, 16 March at 11:00 AM in the Elizabethan A-C room. The WHOIS Policy Review Team hopes your constituency will actively submit comments and thoughts to this process as their feedback will be most helpful in the completion of their exercise. I hope you are well, and am looking forward to seeing you again next week, during our scheduled meeting with the Registries constituency at 14:30 on Tuesday March 15. Kind regards Emily [http://www.etlaw.co.uk/images/stories/etlaw/logo310.gif] 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk From kim at vonarx.ca Tue Mar 8 16:26:06 2011 From: kim at vonarx.ca (Kim G. von Arx) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:26:06 -0500 Subject: [Rt4-whois] apologies re: SF trip Message-ID: <0C87D09C-2A23-4496-B304-30C5F86C6EB6@vonarx.ca> Dear All: I am very sorry to inform you, but I have to cancel the SF trip due to personal circumstances. I will try to call into some of the meetings, but I am not sure how many of those I will be able to make. My apologies for the late change in plans. I wish you all a fruitful and successful meeting. I will, while not in body, be there in spirit. Kim __________________________________ kim at vonarx.ca +1 (613) 286-4445 "Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars..." -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110308/7fbb93d4/attachment.html From alice.jansen at icann.org Wed Mar 9 14:18:59 2011 From: alice.jansen at icann.org (Alice Jansen) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 06:18:59 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] YOUR SV MEETING SCHEDULE Message-ID: Dear Review Team Members, Please note that a session with the ASO has been added to your calendar. The WHOIS Policy RT will join the ASO AC crew on Tuesday at 11:00 AM (Olympic room). Please be kindly reminded that your full SV Meeting schedule is available on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Silicon+Valley+Meeting As you may have noticed, outlook invitations have also been sent to you for each session. Please make sure to save them/add them to your calendar. Also note that I have added a direct hyperlink to your schedule on your wiki's homepage for your convenience. Please feel free to contact me should you have questions or concerns. Thanks, Very best regards Alice ----- F2F Meeting Sunday, 13 March - 09:00 - 18:00 - Grand Ballroom Agenda Interaction with Constituencies SSAC: Tuesday, 15 March - 09:30 - 10:00 - Tower Salon A Registrars: Tuesday, 15 March - 10:00 - 10:30 - Grand Ballroom ASO: Tuesday, 15 March - 11:00 - 11:30 - Olympic ccNSO: Wednesday, 16 March - 12:40 - 13:00 - California West Registries: Tuesday, 15 March - 14:30 - 15:00 - Elizabethan D Interaction with the Community Wednesday, 16 March - 11:00 - 12:00 - Elizabethan A-C Agenda: 1. Introduction of Review Team Members (11:00-11:05) 2. Presentation of the Action and Outreach program adopted by the Review Team (11:05-11:10) 3. Presentation of the Review Team?s Scope of Work and Roadmap 4. Presentation of Definitions: Law Enforcement, Applicable Laws, Producers & Maintainers of WHOIS data and Consumers 5. Request for Public Comments and Input from the Community: http://icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-04mar11-en.htm (11:10-11:25) 6. Open floor: public comments, Q&A session (11:25-12:00) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110309/703c1067/attachment.html From alice.jansen at icann.org Wed Mar 9 14:30:36 2011 From: alice.jansen at icann.org (Alice Jansen) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 06:30:36 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Interaction with the Community - Agenda Message-ID: Dear Review Team Members, Kindly note that your agenda for the interaction with the community session has been updated to reflect the recent developments: 1. Introduction of Review Team Members (11:00-11:05) 2. Presentation of the Action and Outreach program adopted by the Review Team (11:05-11:10) 3. Presentation of the Review Team?s Scope of Work and Roadmap 4. Presentation of Definitions: Law Enforcement, Applicable Laws, Producers & Maintainers of WHOIS data and Consumers 5. Request for Public Comments and Input from the Community: http://icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-04mar11-en.htm (11:10-11:25) 6. Open floor: public comments, Q&A session (11:25-12:00) Supporting staff has submitted a request for change to the meetings department but cannot guarantee that it will be granted (deadline: 21 Feb). Thanks for your understanding, Very best regards Alice -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110309/87f8ed68/attachment.html From alice.jansen at icann.org Wed Mar 9 15:05:20 2011 From: alice.jansen at icann.org (Alice Jansen) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 07:05:20 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Preliminary Report - 2 March In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Dear Review Team Members, Please find attached ? for your consideration - the preliminary report of your last conference call. Note that is also available on the wiki at https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Call+07+-+2+March+2011. Thanks, Kind regards Alice -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110309/5c813639/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Prel Rep - 2 March.doc Type: application/x-msword Size: 40960 bytes Desc: Prel Rep - 2 March.doc Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110309/5c813639/PrelRep-2March.doc From emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk Thu Mar 10 14:32:36 2011 From: emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk (Emily Taylor) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:32:36 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Suggested updates for our agenda on Sunday Message-ID: Dear all Thanks for all the work you have put in to making the public comment happen. Reviewing the definitional work done by the subteams, I think it has been a job well done. I'm looking forward to receiving comments through this process. Thinking about Sunday's agenda - a couple of thoughts: - We were unable to get an Art 29 speaker as originally planned - The GAC has responded to our invitation for an outreach session, with a suggested time of 15:30-16:00 - Our discussions in our most recent call highlighted the need for us to spend some quality time as a group discussing what is meant by consumer trust, and revisiting what we are trying to do with our questionnaire. - Given that our definitions are now out for public comment, I don't think we can really progress them until we've got some feedback from the community. So, I'm attaching a redline of the agenda, and would appreciate any comments. It looks worse than it is, because most of the changes are in fact re-ordering. The main changes are to replace subteam definitions feedback/discussion with a session on consumer trust and the questionnaire, and to put in a session with GAC in the afternoon. Please let me know what you think. Kind regards Emily 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110310/012780d7/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: SF Mtg - WHOIS Agenda v2.doc Type: application/msword Size: 49152 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110310/012780d7/SFMtg-WHOISAgendav2.doc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110310/012780d7/attachment-0001.html From lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com Thu Mar 10 20:10:28 2011 From: lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com (lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:10:28 -0700 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Suggested updates for our agenda on Sunday Message-ID: <20110310131028.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.444cc0fe26.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110310/88fd34aa/attachment.html From Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au Thu Mar 10 21:26:12 2011 From: Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au (Nettlefold, Peter) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:26:12 +1100 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Suggested updates for our agenda on Sunday [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] In-Reply-To: <20110310131028.00ef555ff13978e3e1b8d2179880f99e.444cc0fe26.wbe@email12.secureserver.net> Message-ID: <636771A7F4383E408C57A0240B5F8D4A30259127D1@EMB01.dept.gov.au> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Hi Emily and all, I agree that these changes look very sensible, and I support them. See you all soon. Cheers Peter From: lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com [mailto:lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com] Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 07:10 AM To: Emily Taylor Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org WHOIS Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Suggested updates for our agenda on Sunday Thanks Emily for your time and thought to make sure we make best use of time. Your proposed changes and rationale for them are sensible to me. Best regards, Lynn -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Rt4-whois] Suggested updates for our agenda on Sunday From: Emily Taylor > Date: Thu, March 10, 2011 9:32 am To: "rt4-whois at icann.org WHOIS" > Dear all Thanks for all the work you have put in to making the public comment happen. Reviewing the definitional work done by the subteams, I think it has been a job well done. I'm looking forward to receiving comments through this process. Thinking about Sunday's agenda - a couple of thoughts: - We were unable to get an Art 29 speaker as originally planned - The GAC has responded to our invitation for an outreach session, with a suggested time of 15:30-16:00 - Our discussions in our most recent call highlighted the need for us to spend some quality time as a group discussing what is meant by consumer trust, and revisiting what we are trying to do with our questionnaire. - Given that our definitions are now out for public comment, I don't think we can really progress them until we've got some feedback from the community. So, I'm attaching a redline of the agenda, and would appreciate any comments. It looks worse than it is, because most of the changes are in fact re-ordering. The main changes are to replace subteam definitions feedback/discussion with a session on consumer trust and the questionnaire, and to put in a session with GAC in the afternoon. Please let me know what you think. Kind regards Emily 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted is for the use of the intended recipient only and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, disclosure, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited and may result in severe penalties. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the Security Advisor of the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, 38 Sydney Ave, Forrest ACT 2603, telephone (02) 6271-1376 and delete all copies of this transmission together with any attachments. Please consider the environment before printing this email. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110311/9f77f517/attachment.html From bill.smith at paypal-inc.com Thu Mar 10 21:37:18 2011 From: bill.smith at paypal-inc.com (Smith, Bill) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:37:18 -0700 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Suggested updates for our agenda on Sunday [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] In-Reply-To: <636771A7F4383E408C57A0240B5F8D4A30259127D1@EMB01.dept.gov.au> References: <636771A7F4383E408C57A0240B5F8D4A30259127D1@EMB01.dept.gov.au> Message-ID: <86DC887E-E0F7-4A3B-B01B-2AD647D031F0@paypal.com> +1 On Mar 10, 2011, at 1:26 PM, Nettlefold, Peter wrote: Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Hi Emily and all, I agree that these changes look very sensible, and I support them. See you all soon. Cheers Peter From: lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com [mailto:lynn at goodsecurityconsulting.com] Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 07:10 AM To: Emily Taylor > Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org WHOIS > Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Suggested updates for our agenda on Sunday Thanks Emily for your time and thought to make sure we make best use of time. Your proposed changes and rationale for them are sensible to me. Best regards, Lynn -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Rt4-whois] Suggested updates for our agenda on Sunday From: Emily Taylor > Date: Thu, March 10, 2011 9:32 am To: "rt4-whois at icann.org WHOIS" > Dear all Thanks for all the work you have put in to making the public comment happen. Reviewing the definitional work done by the subteams, I think it has been a job well done. I'm looking forward to receiving comments through this process. Thinking about Sunday's agenda - a couple of thoughts: - We were unable to get an Art 29 speaker as originally planned - The GAC has responded to our invitation for an outreach session, with a suggested time of 15:30-16:00 - Our discussions in our most recent call highlighted the need for us to spend some quality time as a group discussing what is meant by consumer trust, and revisiting what we are trying to do with our questionnaire. - Given that our definitions are now out for public comment, I don't think we can really progress them until we've got some feedback from the community. So, I'm attaching a redline of the agenda, and would appreciate any comments. It looks worse than it is, because most of the changes are in fact re-ordering. The main changes are to replace subteam definitions feedback/discussion with a session on consumer trust and the questionnaire, and to put in a session with GAC in the afternoon. Please let me know what you think. Kind regards Emily 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted is for the use of the intended recipient only and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, disclosure, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited and may result in severe penalties. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the Security Advisor of the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, 38 Sydney Ave, Forrest ACT 2603, telephone (02) 6271-1376 and delete all copies of this transmission together with any attachments. Please consider the environment before printing this email. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From jbladel at godaddy.com Fri Mar 11 00:42:19 2011 From: jbladel at godaddy.com (James M. Bladel) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:42:19 -0700 Subject: [Rt4-whois] YOUR SV MEETING SCHEDULE Message-ID: <20110310174219.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.56c6eeb1eb.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110310/6d20af63/attachment.html From denise.michel at icann.org Fri Mar 11 04:57:15 2011 From: denise.michel at icann.org (Denise Michel) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:57:15 -0800 Subject: [Rt4-whois] ICANN SV Meeting - change to general schedule, FYI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-10mar11-en.htm ICANN 40 ? Silicon Valley Meeting Schedule Changes 10 March 2011 Continuing discussions between the Board and the Governmental Advisory Committee have resulted in schedule changes for ICANN's upcoming meeting Silicon Valley ? San Francisco Public Meeting. The Board and the GAC made progress in their Brussels consultations in narrowing the outstanding issues, as evidenced in the reporting of anticipated changes made in response to GAC's scorecard. As a result, and to increase the likelihood of additional areas of agreement, the Board and GAC have agreed on the need to expand the planned consultation at the upcoming Silicon Valley meeting. The main schedule highlights are: - The addition of the planned Board-GAC consultations in two separate sessions, on Tuesday and Thursday. These consultations were noticed by the ICANN Board and will follow the same protocol as the recent meeting in Brussels: the Board and GAC will continue their dialogue and the public will be allowed to observe. - Tuesday, 15 March: 9:00am ? 5:00pm - Thursday, 17 March: 8:00am ? 4:00pm - As part of ICANN's multi-stakeholder, bottom-up process, two other sessions will allow the community to provide feedback on the new gTLD program and the GAC-Board consultations in particular. These are scheduled for: - Monday, 14 March: 2:00pm ? 4:30pm - Wednesday, 16 March: 9:00am ? 12:00pm - The public forum, offering participants the chance to offer their views on a wide range of important Internet-related topics, this will occur on Thursday, 17 March, 4:00pm ? 6:00pm. - The *Getting Ready ? The New gTLD Questionnaire* session that was scheduled for Thursday, 17 March, conflicts with other gTLD sessions and will be rescheduled for an online session after the meeting. The Silicon Valley meeting schedule will be updated shortly. We apologize for these last minute changes, which we know may cause some inconvenience. However, given the extraordinary nature of the topics and the opportunity presented, ICANN leaders thought time should be devoted to this. We hope this notice allows you time to adjust your schedules accordingly. For those unable to attend in person, remote participation will be available. See details for each session on the schedule. Denise Michel ICANN Advisor to the President & CEO denise.michel at icann.org +1.408.429.3072 mobile +1.310.578.8632 direct -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110310/9946f400/attachment.html From jbladel at godaddy.com Sat Mar 12 18:06:59 2011 From: jbladel at godaddy.com (James M. Bladel) Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:06:59 -0700 Subject: [Rt4-whois] YOUR SV MEETING SCHEDULE Message-ID: <20110312110659.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.25842e3fc7.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110312/14b5e907/attachment.html From lutz at iks-jena.de Sun Mar 13 05:36:29 2011 From: lutz at iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 05:36:29 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Rt4-whois] Proposal for the consultations Message-ID: I used the time during the flight to compile a first draft of "presentation" which might be useful during the various short consultation sessions. http://www.iks-jena.de/mitarb/lutz/ICANN40-rt4-20110312.pdf Please let us discuss this tomorrow. Hope to see you all. From kKleiman at pir.org Sun Mar 13 15:20:50 2011 From: kKleiman at pir.org (Kathy Kleiman) Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 11:20:50 -0400 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Suggested updates for our agenda on Sunday In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3371CBBD15D9714482943AD5D5B752760587133EAA@pir-mail-01> Hello Emily, A much belated response that it is an excellent agenda, and I am so glad you were able to revise it for our big day today. Looking forward to our meeting with GAC, to our work ahead, and especially to seeing everyone in just a few minutes. Best, Kathy From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 6:33 AM To: rt4-whois at icann.org WHOIS Subject: [Rt4-whois] Suggested updates for our agenda on Sunday Dear all Thanks for all the work you have put in to making the public comment happen. Reviewing the definitional work done by the subteams, I think it has been a job well done. I'm looking forward to receiving comments through this process. Thinking about Sunday's agenda - a couple of thoughts: - We were unable to get an Art 29 speaker as originally planned - The GAC has responded to our invitation for an outreach session, with a suggested time of 15:30-16:00 - Our discussions in our most recent call highlighted the need for us to spend some quality time as a group discussing what is meant by consumer trust, and revisiting what we are trying to do with our questionnaire. - Given that our definitions are now out for public comment, I don't think we can really progress them until we've got some feedback from the community. So, I'm attaching a redline of the agenda, and would appreciate any comments. It looks worse than it is, because most of the changes are in fact re-ordering. The main changes are to replace subteam definitions feedback/discussion with a session on consumer trust and the questionnaire, and to put in a session with GAC in the afternoon. Please let me know what you think. Kind regards Emily -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110313/7c2d4362/attachment.html From alice.jansen at icann.org Sun Mar 13 15:25:33 2011 From: alice.jansen at icann.org (Alice Jansen) Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 08:25:33 -0700 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Virtual Meeting Room - Adobe Message-ID: Dear Review Team Members, Please note that we have a Virtual Meeting Room http://icann.adobeconnect.com/sfo40-ballroom in which we will project your documents. The Adobe room also has the chat function and a webcam view of the head table. Please join the room if you can to see the community's reaction. Thanks, See you soon! Alice -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110313/ef018dbf/attachment.html From Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au Sun Mar 13 16:59:56 2011 From: Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au (Nettlefold, Peter) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 03:59:56 +1100 Subject: [Rt4-whois] GAC Principles [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Message-ID: <636771A7F4383E408C57A0240B5F8D4A3025A5EDDD@EMB01.dept.gov.au> Hi all GAC Principles attached. Cheers Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted is for the use of the intended recipient only and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, disclosure, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited and may result in severe penalties. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the Security Advisor of the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, 38 Sydney Ave, Forrest ACT 2603, telephone (02) 6271-1376 and delete all copies of this transmission together with any attachments. Please consider the environment before printing this email. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: GAC whois principles.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 78080 bytes Desc: GAC whois principles.pdf Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110314/32a9b8cc/GACwhoisprinciples.pdf From sarmad at cantab.net Sun Mar 13 20:38:05 2011 From: sarmad at cantab.net (Dr. Sarmad Hussain) Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:38:05 -0700 Subject: [Rt4-whois] Defs of consumer trust Message-ID: <005401cbe1be$8f158860$ad409920$@net> 2. What "promotes consumer trust"? Consumer trust can be viewed from the context of WHOIS data Providers, Maintainers and Users. The following promotes consumer trust: Consumer confidence and assurance that the WHOIS data is provided accurately and with consent, maintained openly and securely, and used legitimately and easily to facilitate communication and interaction within internet community, for administrative, legal or technical issues and for the security and stability of the internet Regard, Sarmad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110313/75a9bdcd/attachment.html From emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk Sun Mar 13 23:22:37 2011 From: emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk (Emily Taylor) Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 23:22:37 +0000 Subject: [Rt4-whois] slide deck for GAC Message-ID: Hi Alice Here are the slides which we presented to the GAC this afternoon. There is one GAC specific slide in there, and I suggest that on Monday we develop a generic "Key questions" slide or similar. Kind regards Emily -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110313/a4459e74/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: SOAC slides.ppt Type: application/vnd.ms-powerpoint Size: 515584 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110313/a4459e74/SOACslides.ppt From alice.jansen at icann.org Sun Mar 13 23:56:45 2011 From: alice.jansen at icann.org (Alice Jansen) Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 16:56:45 -0700 Subject: [Rt4-whois] RT dinner - Kind remidner Message-ID: Where? E&0 Trading Co - Cinnabar Room 314 Sutter Street, San Francisco, CA 9410 http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=314+Sutter+Street,+San+Francisco,+CA+9410&aq=&sll=40.833966,-98.19758&sspn=28.770412,79.013672&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=314+Sutter+St,+San+Francisco,+California+94108&ll=37.790642,-122.405806&spn=0.007359,0.01929&t=h&z=16&iwloc=A When? 7:00 ? 10:00 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110313/bd21fe77/attachment.html