[Rt4-whois] Fw: Can you join earlier?

Alice Jansen alice.jansen at icann.org
Wed Mar 16 19:28:06 UTC 2011


Please join us in California West. Thanks, best Alice
Alice Jansen - ICANN
Sent via Blackberry

________________________________
From: Gabriella Schittek
To: Alice Jansen; Emily Taylor <emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk>
Cc: Kathy Kleiman <kKleiman at pir.org>
Sent: Wed Mar 16 11:52:56 2011
Subject: Can you join earlier?

Hello,

Is there a way that you could join our meeting somewhat earlier? We will end our prior session faster than expected.

Gabi


On 3/15/11 5:48 PM, "Alice Jansen" <alice.jansen at icann.org> wrote:

Hi Gabi,

I have just noticed that the powerpoint title does not match.
Please find attached an updated presentation.

Thanks so much,

Best

Alice

From: Emily Taylor <emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:16:35 -0700
To: Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek at icann.org>
Cc: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen at icann.org>, Kathy Kleiman <kKleiman at pir.org>
Subject: Re: Formal request for agenda space, SF

Hi there

Here it is.

E

On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek at icann.org> wrote:
Hi,

I just wanted to ask you to send me your (final) presentation as soon as possible so that we can prepare for remote participation.

Thanks!

Gabi



On 2/22/11 3:42 PM, "Alice Jansen" <alice.jansen at icann.org <http://alice.jansen@icann.org> > wrote:

Hi Gabi,

Thanks a million – I have added you to our schedule https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Silicon+Valley+Meeting.

Emily, Kathy, - my assumption is that this works for you. If not, please let me know.

Very best regards

Alice

From: Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek at icann.org <http://gabriella.schittek@icann.org> >
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 06:21:19 -0800
To: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen at icann.org <http://alice.jansen@icann.org> >, Emily Taylor <emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk <http://emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> >
Cc: Kathy Kleiman <kKleiman at pir.org <http://kKleiman@pir.org> >
Subject: Re: Formal request for agenda space, SF

Hello Emily & Alice,

The only possibility to change the session was to schedule it at 12.40 – 13.00. I hope this is more suitable. The only risk is that the prior session might overrun!

Gabi

On 2/22/11 11:22 AM, "Alice Jansen" <alice.jansen at icann.org <http://alice.jansen@icann.org> > wrote:

Hi Gabi,

Thanks for trying to squeeze us in your schedule – hopefully it will work out :-).
Emily is on vacation this week, which means very limited access to emails. Please do not hesitate to contact me, ccing Kathy – our Vice-Chair –, if you have questions.

Thanks so much!

Kind regards

Alice

From: Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek at icann.org <http://gabriella.schittek@icann.org> >
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 07:39:12 -0800
To: Emily Taylor <emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk <http://emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> >
Cc: Kathy Kleiman <kKleiman at pir.org <http://kKleiman@pir.org> >, Alice Jansen <alice.jansen at icann.org <http://alice.jansen@icann.org> >
Subject: Re: Formal request for agenda space, SF

Hello Emily,

Thanks for pointing this out - I’ll see what I can do about this! I’ll let you know!

Kind regards,

Gabi


On 2/19/11 11:52 AM, "Emily Taylor" <emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk <http://emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> > wrote:

Hi Gabi

Thank you very much for squeezing us in.  Is there a possibility that we could have our 20 minute slot at any other time? Because as luck would have it, that slot exactly coincides with our "Community Interaction".

https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Silicon+Valley+Meeting

Many thanks,

Emily


On 18 Feb 2011, at 08:01, Gabriella Schittek wrote:

Hello Emily,

The ccNSO draft agenda has now been published http://ccnso.icann.org/meetings/sanfrancisco/agenda.htm. I could squeeze you in, but only for 20 minutes, Wednesday 16 March, 11.00 – 11.20.

I hope this is OK.

Gabi


On 2/9/11 7:02 PM, "Emily Taylor" <emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk <http://emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk>  <x-msg://47/emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> > wrote:

Thanks Chris,

Much appreciated.  Isn't it 5 am your time?

E

On 9 Feb 2011, at 17:56, Chris Disspain wrote:

Thanks Emily.

We are working on fitting you into the agenda.

Cheers,

Chris Disspain | Chief Executive Officer
.au Domain Administration Ltd
T: 1300 732 929 <tel:1300%20732%20929>  | F: 03 8341 4112 <tel:03%208341%204112>
E: ceo at auda.org.au <http://ceo@auda.org.au>  <x-msg://47/ceo@auda.org.au> <mailto:ceo at auda.org.au>  | W:www.auda.org.au <http://www.auda.org.au>  <http://www.auda.org.au> <http://www.auda.org.au/>

auDA - The Australian Domain Name Administrator


Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email.

From: Emily Taylor [mailto:emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, 10 February 2011 04:50
To: Chris Disspain
Cc: Gabriella Schittek
Subject: Formal request for agenda space, SF

Dear Chris and Gabi,

I have pleasure in sending a formal request on behalf of the WHOIS Review Team, as Chair and ccNSO representative, for some time on the ccNSO meeting agenda.  I understand that your agenda planning process is already far advanced, but would be most grateful if you could find us a few minutes.

As you may know, the WHOIS Policy Review Team mandated by the Affirmation of Commitments began its enterprise in October 2010. The scope of work and roadmap of the WHOIS RT as well as its activities may be found on the community wiki at https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/WHOIS+Policy+Review+Team.
The Team partially composed of SO/AC representatives will hold a second public face-to-face meeting in San Francisco on Sunday, 13 March and invite the ICANN community to interact with them on Wednesday, 16 March starting at 11:00 AM ending at noon.
In addition to this schedule, the RT Members unanimously expressed the wish to meet with ICANN's respective SO/ACs not only to discuss the task they have entrusted with but also to collect input from constituents. As your feedback and comments are essential in this exercise, it would be a great honor if the WHOIS Policy Review Team could please join your session in San Francisco to exchange views. Please advise whether you would be willing to dedicate an agenda item to the WHOIS Policy RT.

Many thanks in advance for your guidance,

Best regards,


Emily Taylor
Chair,
WHOIS Review Team

76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
telephone: 01865 582 811   mobile: 07540 049 322
emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk <http://emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk>  <x-msg://47/emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> <mailto:emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk>  www.etlaw.co.uk <http://www.etlaw.co.uk>  <http://www.etlaw.co.uk> <http://www.etlaw.co.uk <http://www.etlaw.co.uk/> >




__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 5857 (20110208) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com <http://www.eset.com/>



76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
 telephone: 01865 582 811   mobile: 07540 049 322
 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk <http://emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk>  <x-msg://47/emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> www.etlaw.co.uk <http://www.etlaw.co.uk>  <http://www.etlaw.co.uk>  <http://www.etlaw.co.uk <http://www.etlaw.co.uk/> >






76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
 telephone: 01865 582 811   mobile: 07540 049 322
 emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk <http://emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> www.etlaw.co.uk <http://www.etlaw.co.uk>  <http://www.etlaw.co.uk>







-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110316/acf21403/attachment.html 


More information about the Rt4-whois mailing list