[Rt4-whois] SANFRANCISCO NOTES FOR APPROVAL Proposed agenda for tomorrow's meeting

[Omar Kaminski]

Dear RT Members and friends,

My dad and mom are here for 9 days, my dad had a surgery scheduled for
yesterday and it was delayed. Both are old-aged (77) and I need to assist
them in many things.

So I ask you my apologies for staying away for a while. Neverthless, I'll do
my best to participate on the call tomorroy.

Regards from .br,

Omar


2011/4/5 Alice Jansen <alice.jansen at icann.org>

> Dear Review Team Members,
>
> Following up on Emily's email, please find attached the San Francisco
> meeting notes that will be discussed tomorrow during the call.
>
> Comments and feedback are more than welcome.
>
> The report and San Francisco material are also available on the wiki for
> your convenience:
> https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Silicon+Valley+Meeting
>
> Thank you,
>
> Very best regards
>
> Alice
>
> From: Emily Taylor <emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk>
> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 09:50:28 -0700
> To: RT4 WHOIS <rt4-whois at icann.org>
> Subject: [Rt4-whois] Proposed agenda for tomorrow's meeting
>
> Dear all
>
> I've just returned from a few days away, and have been catching up on
> discussions on the list.
>
> Peter - thank you for your suggestion of an issues paper.  I think this may
> be a good opportunity to side-step the difficulties we have discussed (and
> financial implications) relating to formal questionnaires, and I would be
> grateful if you would introduce this topic on our next call.
>
> I'm aware that the consumer trust subteam, prompted by Sarmad, has
> continued to work through the issues, and I'd like Sarmad to brief the RT on
> progress, and a proposed way forward.
>
> I would also like us to spend some quality time discussing the draft report
> outline which I circulated on the list on 22 March, on which there has so
> far been little comment.
>
> Another thing we need to do is plan our time in Singapore carefully.  Peter
> has suggested a session with law enforcement, and we need to think through
> (1) whether we would find this helpful (2) how to get the most out of such a
> session and (3) what other stakeholders should participate?
>
> So, I attach a draft agenda for your comments, and also a copy of the draft
> report outline.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Emily
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rt4-whois mailing list
> Rt4-whois at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110405/53761744/attachment.html