[Rt4-whois] SANFRANCISCO NOTES FOR APPROVAL Proposed agenda for tomorrow's meeting

[Kathy Kleiman]

All,
I join Bill and Omar in sending my regrets for this meeting. My son's Bar Mitzvah is on Saturday, and we are in the throes of final preparation. Looking forward to hearing about the meeting, and best to everyone, Kathy

-----Original Message-----
From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Smith, Bill
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 5:46 AM
To: rt4-whois
Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] SANFRANCISCO NOTES FOR APPROVAL Proposed agenda for tomorrow's meeting

I'll send my regrets for this meeting. I'm in Geneva and have meetings starting at 07:30 Thu & Fri. If I've done the timezone math correctly, this call will start at 01:00 local time leaving little time for sleep.

On Apr 5, 2011, at 11:32 AM, Omar Kaminski wrote:

Dear RT Members and friends,

My dad and mom are here for 9 days, my dad had a surgery scheduled for yesterday and it was delayed. Both are old-aged (77) and I need to assist them in many things.

So I ask you my apologies for staying away for a while. Neverthless, I'll do my best to participate on the call tomorroy.

Regards from .br,

Omar


2011/4/5 Alice Jansen <alice.jansen at icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen at icann.org>>
Dear Review Team Members,

Following up on Emily's email, please find attached the San Francisco meeting notes that will be discussed tomorrow during the call.

Comments and feedback are more than welcome.

The report and San Francisco material are also available on the wiki for your convenience: https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Silicon+Valley+Meeting

Thank you,

Very best regards

Alice

From: Emily Taylor <emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk<mailto:emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk>>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 09:50:28 -0700
To: RT4 WHOIS <rt4-whois at icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois at icann.org>>
Subject: [Rt4-whois] Proposed agenda for tomorrow's meeting

Dear all

I've just returned from a few days away, and have been catching up on discussions on the list.

Peter - thank you for your suggestion of an issues paper.  I think this may be a good opportunity to side-step the difficulties we have discussed (and financial implications) relating to formal questionnaires, and I would be grateful if you would introduce this topic on our next call.

I'm aware that the consumer trust subteam, prompted by Sarmad, has continued to work through the issues, and I'd like Sarmad to brief the RT on progress, and a proposed way forward.

I would also like us to spend some quality time discussing the draft report outline which I circulated on the list on 22 March, on which there has so far been little comment.

Another thing we need to do is plan our time in Singapore carefully.  Peter has suggested a session with law enforcement, and we need to think through (1) whether we would find this helpful (2) how to get the most out of such a session and (3) what other stakeholders should participate?

So, I attach a draft agenda for your comments, and also a copy of the draft report outline.

Kind regards

Emily

_______________________________________________
Rt4-whois mailing list
Rt4-whois at icann.org<mailto:Rt4-whois at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois


<ATT00001..txt>


_______________________________________________
Rt4-whois mailing list
Rt4-whois at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois