[Rt4-whois] Summary of public comments - Law Enforcement

[Emily Taylor]

Hi Sharon

Thank you for reviewing the public comments.  As for next steps, please would you prepare a summary for the Review Team, as follows:

1. Propose amendments to the definitions, based on comments received and/or
2. Suggest explanatory text which makes the subgroup's reasoning clearer (sometimes you get comments which are things you have considered in preparing your document, and you just need to explain why you chose to do something different) or
3. Where you cannot accept a comment, please provide reasoning

This is a task where two heads (or more) are infinitely better than one - no offence, Sharon! - and I suggest that you work within the law enforcement subgroup in discussing the comments, and what you intend to take on board or otherwise.

So, I suggest that you work with Kim, and Lutz.  If anyone else wants to be involved in this process, who is not also involved in a similar process with one of the other definitional subteams, please volunteer.

Best,

Emily

On 16 May 2011, at 11:33, LEMON, Sharon wrote:

> NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
> 
> I have reviewed the comments in relation to law enforcement. There were seven comments from:
>  
> Business Constituency
> Coalition against Unsolicited Commercial email
> European Communities Trademark Association + Marques
> Intellectual Property Constituency
> Lexinta
> Registrar Stakeholder Group
> Volodya
>  
> Only the Business Constituency were happy with the law enforcement definition, with all others suggesting some admendments or significant changes.
>  
> Emily/Anyone - what are the next steps please?  The original defination was as a result of our small subgroup, Kim, Lutz and I - where we came up with the definition and prepared a questionnaire.  Peter is currently looking at the questionnaire before we ask the RT to approve me sending it to my law enforcement network and Peter submitting to his GAC colleagues for their network.
>  
>  
> Sharon
>  
>  
> Sharon LEMON OBE 
> Deputy Director 
> Cyber and Forensics 
> Serious and Organised Crime Agency (SOCA) 
> 07768 290902 
> 0207 855 2800
> 
> This information is supplied in confidence by SOCA, and is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. It may also be subject to exemption under other UK legislation. Onward disclosure may be unlawful, for example, under the Data Protection Act 1998. Requests for disclosure to the public must be referred to the SOCA FOI single point of contact, by email on PICUEnquiries at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk or by telephoning 0870 268 8677.
> 
> 
>  
> All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible.
> 
>  
> 
> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.


76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK 
telephone: 01865 582 811   mobile: 07540 049 322 
emily.taylor at etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110516/bb159dab/attachment.html