[Rt4-whois] Chat Transcript - today's call
Alice Jansen
alice.jansen at icann.org
Wed May 18 08:12:36 UTC 2011
Dear Review Team Members,
Please find below the chat transcript of your call:
> Lutz Donnerhacke: (5/18/2011 09:02) Yes
> Emily Taylor: (09:03) hi Lutz
> Lynn Goodendorf: (09:03) yes
> Lutz Donnerhacke: (09:03) legitemete needs is AoC
> Lutz Donnerhacke: (09:07) Whois began as alook-up service toenable
>Internetoperators to findone another andcommunicatedirectly if
>abnormalitiesin trafficoccur betweenservers. (ICANNAnnual Report „09)
> Lynn Goodendorf: (09:10) while it began that way, it is not up to date
> Lynn Goodendorf: (09:12) I like "those who operate"
> Lynn Goodendorf: (09:12) yes
> Bladel: (09:13) I like "those who operate"
> Bladel: (09:13) I think policy is "Registered Name Holder"
> Lynn Goodendorf: (09:13) good point Susan
> Susan: (09:14) Registered Name Holder would be fine with me
> Lynn Goodendorf: (09:15) what about "registrant contacts for..."
> peter: (09:17) I like James' original suggestion of 'entities
>responsible for'
> Lutz Donnerhacke: (09:17) whois -h whois.ripe.net -i e-mail
>lutz at iks-jena.de
> Sharon LEMON 2: (09:18) I would support James' proposal too
> Bladel: (09:22) Either is fine by me.
> Bladel: (09:24) 1.5 Red Bull
> Sharon LEMON 2: (09:24) 9am
> Susan: (09:32) I agree with James
> Lutz Donnerhacke: (09:35) ... techincal ressource lookup ..
> Bladel: (09:35) "technical queries?"
> Lutz Donnerhacke: (09:35) ok
> Lutz Donnerhacke: (09:36) Example: RFC 2622 - Routing Policy
>Specification Language (RPSL)
> Lutz Donnerhacke: (09:37) yes
> Bladel: (09:37) in one swell foop.
> Bladel: (09:40) it was mine.
> Lutz Donnerhacke: (09:40) It's even unclear, where the AoC wording is
>comming from.
> Lutz Donnerhacke: (09:40) 1) law enforcement occurs there for the first
>time (not in the polices)
> Lutz Donnerhacke: (09:41) 2) legitimate needs are not described
> Lutz Donnerhacke: (09:41) 3) definition of whois (as accurate, timely,
>... service) is not founded.
> Bladel: (09:57) consensus policies:
>http://www.icann.org/en/general/consensus-policies.htm
> Alice Jansen: (09:59) FYI - Bill dropped
> Bladel: (10:03) ongoing policy development or Whois policy
>milestones.... or something.
> Lutz Donnerhacke: (10:04) Thank you all
> Sharon LEMON 2: (10:04) Thanks All, good sleep or good day
> Alice Jansen: (10:05) Thank you for participating
More information about the Rt4-whois
mailing list