[Rt4-whois] Comments on the draft discussion paper [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

[Olof Nordling]

Dear Peter,
On your first comment in the doc, regarding deletion of questions 5 and 6, I checked with my manually edited copy from last call and you are SO right, thanks for catching that omission! Moreover, according to my notes, also questions 3 and 4 were to be deleted, but it just didn't happen in the version I sent out (mea culpa, new glasses needed perhaps?). To be rectified in the next version after today's call.
Very best regards
Olof

From: Nettlefold, Peter [mailto:Peter.Nettlefold at dbcde.gov.au]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 8:58 AM
To: rt4-whois at icann.org; Emily Taylor
Cc: Olof Nordling; Alice Jansen
Subject: Comments on the draft discussion paper [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Hello all,

Unfortunately I won't be able to make tonight's call on the discussion paper, and have instead made some comments and suggestions in the attached (in revision mode, and with comment boxes) which I hope will be helpful.

I think the paper is starting to look very good, and one that will hopefully draw out some useful community feedback.

As you'll see, I've noted a couple of questions that I think we'd already agreed to delete, and also proposed an additional sub-component to one question which I'd be very interested to get community feedback on. I've also commented on the proposed 'costs' section of the paper, which I have some questions and concerns about.

I look forward to reviewing the version that comes out of tonight's call asap after its available.

Cheers,

Peter

From: rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Olof Nordling
Sent: Wednesday, 25 May 2011 6:22 PM
To: rt4-whois at icann.org
Subject: [Rt4-whois] WHOIS Review - updated draft following today's call

Dear Review Team Members,
Today's call, chaired by Kathy and attended by Peter, Susan, Bill, Kim and Omar, focused on agenda item 1, advancing the issues paper. Edits were made up to the end of the second question box on page 5, as marked in the attached version. The list of consensus policies was moved above the first question box and the team decided to include hyperlinks to main documents.

PLEASE NOTE: When adding the hyperlinks, I noted that items 3 and 4 in the consensus policy list on page 4 seem to relate to the same instrument, notably the WHOIS Marketing Restriction Policy, so I reflected that in the drafting, marked by red. This is to be confirmed, though!

Also, please correct (and bear with me...) if I missed or misunderstood any of the decided edits.

Very best regards

Olof


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The information transmitted is for the use of the intended recipient only and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, disclosure, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited and may result in severe penalties.


If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the Security Advisor of the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, 38 Sydney Ave, Forrest ACT 2603, telephone (02) 6271-1376 and delete all copies of this transmission together with any attachments.


Please consider the environment before printing this email.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110601/3b641a9f/attachment.html