[Rt4-whois] Comments on the draft discussion paper

[Kathy Kleiman]

One final note to all - we finished last week's two hour session on the 
question box, questions 9-13. After the review of the few edits and 
changes to prior sections, I would recommend that we start at these 
questions, review the following section, "Cost Impact & Considerations," 
and then I think we are done!

Best,
Kathy
Attachment:  Discussion paper, same version as my last email 
(Peter/Kathy edits)




Hello all,
>
> Unfortunately I won't be able to make tonight's call on the discussion 
> paper, and have instead made some comments and suggestions in the 
> attached (in revision mode, and with comment boxes) which I hope will 
> be helpful.
>
> I think the paper is starting to look very good, and one that will 
> hopefully draw out some useful community feedback.
>
> As you'll see, I've noted a couple of questions that I think we'd 
> already agreed to delete, and also proposed an additional 
> sub-component to one question which I'd be very interested to get 
> community feedback on. I've also commented on the proposed 'costs' 
> section of the paper, which I have some questions and concerns about.
>
> I look forward to reviewing the version that comes out of tonight's 
> call asap after its available.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Peter
>
> *From:*rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org 
> [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Olof Nordling
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 25 May 2011 6:22 PM
> *To:* rt4-whois at icann.org
> *Subject:* [Rt4-whois] WHOIS Review - updated draft following today's call
>
> Dear Review Team Members,
>
> Today's call, chaired by Kathy and attended by Peter, Susan, Bill, Kim 
> and Omar, focused on agenda item 1, advancing the issues paper. Edits 
> were made up to the end of the second question box on page 5, as 
> marked in the attached version. The list of consensus policies was 
> moved above the first question box and the team decided to include 
> hyperlinks to main documents.
>
> PLEASE NOTE: When adding the hyperlinks, I noted that items 3 and 4 in 
> the consensus policy list on page 4 seem to relate to the same 
> instrument, notably the WHOIS Marketing Restriction Policy, so I 
> reflected that in the drafting, marked by red. This is to be 
> confirmed, though!
>
> Also, please correct (and bear with me...) if I missed or 
> misunderstood any of the decided edits.
>
> Very best regards
>
> Olof
>
>
> *-------------------------------------------------------------------------------*
>
> The information transmitted is for the use of the intended recipient 
> only and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged material. 
> Any review, re-transmission, disclosure, dissemination or other use 
> of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by 
> persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited 
> and may result in severe penalties.
>
>
> If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the Security 
> Advisor of the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital 
> Economy, 38 Sydney Ave, Forrest ACT 2603, telephone (02) 6271-1376 and 
> delete all copies of this transmission together with any attachments.
>
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
>
> *-------------------------------------------------------------------------------*
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rt4-whois mailing list
> Rt4-whois at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110601/867bee78/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: WHOIS Review - draft discussion paper consolidated v6-1	KK.doc
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 46080 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110601/867bee78/WHOISReview-draftdiscussionpaperconsolidatedv6-1KK.doc