[Rt4-whois] Help required - NOW EVEN EASIER!!

[Emily Taylor]

Hi all

Thanks for your feedback.   I agree with Michael and Bill, except that I
think we need to tweak the definition further.  As I recall, there were some
comments (the GAC? others?) to the effect that, while data
protection/privacy laws are the obvious example of relevant applicable laws,
our definition should not *exclude* other relevant applicable laws - and
therefore we should add some words like "or any other relevant laws which
are binding on one or more of the parties".  The commentators may have
suggested better wording, but I think we do need to consider this sort of
sweep up.

Kind regards

Emily

On 15 August 2011 10:18, Mikhail Yakushev <m.yakushev at corp.mail.ru> wrote:

>  Dear Sharon,****
>
> Thank you very much for your valuable work.****
>
> I mostly share Bill’s views (see his separate e-mail) on most comments and
> I think there is no proven necessity to make any substantial changes in any
> of the definitions.****
>
> As for the “Applicable Laws” definition:****
>
> **(a)    **The  feedback was mostly positive,****
>
> **(b)    **I am ready to prepare a short response for each comment – based
> on Bill’s methodology J,****
>
> **(c)    **I think it is possible to agree with Lexinta proposal and to
> remove the reference to the UN Guidelines on Personal Data – indeed, it’s
> legal force is much weaker, that the Human Rights Declaration. However,
> Lexinta’s reference to the ‘applicable’ laws (making an unfortunate
> cross-reference definition) should also be omitted.****
>
> Regards,****
>
> Michael****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces at icann.org] *On
> Behalf Of *LEMON, Sharon
> *Sent:* Friday, August 05, 2011 1:04 PM
> *To:* rt4-whois at icann.org
> *Subject:* [Rt4-whois] Help required - NOW EVEN EASIER!!****
>
> ** **
>
> *NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED *****
>
>  Hello Everyone,****
>
>  ****
>
> Last week I sent out my part of the report - definitions for comment and
> assistance.  Response was ****
>
> limited ;-), but I still need your help.****
>
>  ****
>
> So - to make it even easier I have subdivided the work into three and you
> only need to look at the one which relates to the subgroup you were in.  I
> would like you to look at the definition, the feedback received and let me
> know if you think we should change it in light of that feedback. The first
> document is the key for those who fedback, the second the defination and
> comments and the third the longer version, should you be interested.  I have
> now incorporated the LE feedback from both Peter and I and summarised the
> comments, rather than just listed them.****
>
>  ****
>
> This will only take minutes PROMISE - and  I would really like to feedback
> at our next conference call and I am off next week - so you have until
> Monday 15th!.****
>
>  ****
>
> So - Producers and Maintainers - James, Susan and Wilfried****
>
>        Applicable Laws -Kim, Omar, Michael, Lynn****
>
>        Law Enforcement - Kim, Lutz, Peter. ****
>
>  ****
>
> Here's hoping,****
>
>  ****
>
> Sharon****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> Sharon LEMON OBE
> Deputy Director
> Cyber and Forensics
> Serious and Organised Crime Agency (SOCA)
> 07768 290902
> 0207 855 2800 ****
>
>  ****
>
> This information is supplied in confidence by SOCA, and is exempt from
> disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. It may also be subject
> to exemption under other UK legislation. Onward disclosure may be unlawful,
> for example, under the Data Protection Act 1998. Requests for disclosure
> to the public must be referred to the SOCA FOI single point of contact, by
> email on PICUEnquiries at soca.x.gsi.gov.uk or by telephoning 0870 268 8677.*
> ***
>
>  ****
>
> All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment.
> Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the
> subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and
> without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the
> Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files
> transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom
> they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please
> contact the sender as soon as possible.****
>
>  ****
>
>
> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure
> Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in
> partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On
> leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> recorded for legal purposes.****
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rt4-whois mailing list
> Rt4-whois at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
>
>


-- 




*
*

76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK
t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322
emily at emilytaylor.eu

*www.etlaw.co.uk*

Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and
Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rt4-whois/attachments/20110815/877636d5/attachment.html